EFL ChampionshipRiverside Stadium, Middlesbrough11°24 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    MiddlesbroughMiddlesbroughPossession & high press
    vs
    WolverhamptonWolverhamptonPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Middlesbrough (47%)

    Middlesbrough vs Wolverhampton · EFL Championship

    1 · Middlesbrough 47%X 25%28% Wolverhampton · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Middlesbrough – Wolverhampton

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    Middlesbrough have been the masters of consistency, remaining unbeaten in their last six league outings. This stretch of form suggests a side that knows how to grind out results. In contrast, Wolverhampton Wanderers have been more erratic, and this head-to-head encounter does not provide much historical data to lean on, making current form and expected goals the primary focus for analysis.

    The model leans towards a Middlesbrough win, giving them a 47% chance, yet interestingly, the most likely scorelines are tightly contested: 1-1 stands at 12%, with both a 1-0 and 2-1 home victory at 9% each. Despite this, Middlesbrough's knack for finding the net in eight consecutive matches, paired with their possession-based high press, suggests they are well-equipped to break down Wolves' control-oriented play.

    There's a slight edge for the hosts in xPoints and xG per match, with Middlesbrough's numbers reading 2.0 compared to Wolves' 1.8. However, defensively, the visitors hold an advantage with xGA figures at 0.97 against the 1.2 of the home side. This defensive solidity might just temper the goal-scoring fervor, highlighting a tactical battle where Wolverhampton could frustrate Boro’s efforts.

    With over 2.5 goals priced at 52% and both teams to score at 56%, the numbers hint at a match that could tip either way in terms of goals. A cautious bet would favor a tighter scoreline. For value hunters, Coral offers 6/1 for a 1-1 draw, matching the model's top scoreline probability. This bet aligns with the data, balancing Middlesbrough's attacking form against Wolves' defense, underscored by the model's cautious endorsement.

    MiddlesbroughMiddlesbrough
    Form DWWDD
    League ranking xG #3xGA #3xT #2xP/match #4Points #2
    Key players
    • Amario Oswald Gerardo Cozier-DuberryRWxG 0.28 · xT 0.43
    • Morgan WhittakerRWxG 0.16 · xT 0.10
    • Callum BrittainRWBxG 0.06 · xT 0.14
    WolverhamptonWolverhampton
    Form WLDWW
    League ranking xG #5xGA #1xT #7xP/match #1Points #5
    Key players
    • Fer LópezRWxG 0.36 · xT 0.17
    • Hugo BuenoLBxG 0.02 · xT 0.17
    • Mateus ManéLWxG 0.15 · xT 0.20

    Match prediction: Middlesbrough – Wolverhampton

    Predicted score matrix

    Wolverhampton →
    Middlesbrough →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.6%
    0–17.2%
    0–24.6%
    0–31.9%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–09.4%
    1–112.2%
    1–27.2%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–07.6%
    2–19.2%
    2–25.6%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–04.0%
    3–14.8%
    3–22.9%
    3–31.2%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–02.2%
    4+–12.6%
    4+–21.6%
    4+–30.6%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-09%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-17%
    Expected goals
    1,56–1,21
    Both teams to score
    56%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,548%
    –
    Over 2,552%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Middlesbrough to win47%
    • Over 1.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    36%

    Fair odds

    2.81

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Middlesbrough to win47%
    • Over 2.5 goals52%
    • William Lankshear to score33%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score56%
    • Over 2.5 goals52%
    • William Lankshear to score33%
    • André Trindade da Costa Neto to be booked26%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Middlesbrough47% probability@2.26PinnacleEV+6%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · MiddlesbroughX2 · Wolverhampton
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 6%
    2.26
    3.662.95

    Odds updated 2 Oct, 07:04

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Middlesbrough are unbeaten in their last 6 league matches.
    • Middlesbrough have scored in 8 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Middlesbrough
    Wolverhampton
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Middlesbrough (16–12)
    Wolverhampton (15–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Middlesbrough
    Aidan Morris: 318 passningar, xT 0.25MorrisAdilson Malanda: 215 passningar, xT 0.2MalandaCallum Brittain: 214 passningar, xT 0.75BrittainNeto Borges: 194 passningar, xT 0.6BorgesLuke Ayling: 175 passningar, xT 0.88AylingAshley Famiwuya Phillips: 173 passningar, xT 0.23PhillipsSebastian Matthew Berhalter: 136 passningar, xT 0.6BerhalterRiley Mcgree: 129 passningar, xT 0.06McgreeMaximilian Michael Arfsten: 106 passningar, xT 0.54ArfstenRadek Vítek: 93 passningar, xT 0.26VítekAlfie Jones: 91 passningar, xT 0.11Jones
    Wolverhampton
    Nasser Djiga: 240 passningar, xT 0.24DjigaHugo Bueno: 209 passningar, xT 0.86BuenoAndré: 189 passningar, xT 0.45AndréToti Gomes: 185 passningar, xT 0.15GomesFer López: 182 passningar, xT 0.41LópezJosé Sá: 139 passningar, xT 0.04SáJackson Tchatchoua: 137 passningar, xT 0.31TchatchouaLadislav Krejci: 107 passningar, xT 0.26KrejciMateus Mané: 61 passningar, xT 0.66ManéKieran John Trippier: 57 passningar, xT 0.3TrippierTommy Doyle: 55 passningar, xT 0.06Doyle
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Middlesbrough
    Aidan Morris: 318 passningar, xT 0.25MorrisAdilson Malanda: 215 passningar, xT 0.2MalandaCallum Brittain: 214 passningar, xT 0.75BrittainNeto Borges: 194 passningar, xT 0.6BorgesLuke Ayling: 175 passningar, xT 0.88AylingAshley Famiwuya Phillips: 173 passningar, xT 0.23PhillipsSebastian Matthew Berhalter: 136 passningar, xT 0.6BerhalterRiley Mcgree: 129 passningar, xT 0.06McgreeMaximilian Michael Arfsten: 106 passningar, xT 0.54ArfstenRadek Vítek: 93 passningar, xT 0.26VítekAlfie Jones: 91 passningar, xT 0.11Jones
    Wolverhampton
    Nasser Djiga: 240 passningar, xT 0.24DjigaHugo Bueno: 209 passningar, xT 0.86BuenoAndré: 189 passningar, xT 0.45AndréToti Gomes: 185 passningar, xT 0.15GomesFer López: 182 passningar, xT 0.41LópezJosé Sá: 139 passningar, xT 0.04SáJackson Tchatchoua: 137 passningar, xT 0.31TchatchouaLadislav Krejci: 107 passningar, xT 0.26KrejciMateus Mané: 61 passningar, xT 0.66ManéKieran John Trippier: 57 passningar, xT 0.3TrippierTommy Doyle: 55 passningar, xT 0.06Doyle

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceMiddlesbroughWolverhampton
    Points1514
    xPoints12.812.9
    xG per match21.8
    xGA per match1.20.97
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.270.36
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.220.17
    Playing styleMiddlesbroughWolverhampton
    Build-up efficiency0.340.29
    Field tilt0.650.49
    xT per match1.41.1
    xTA per match0.810.83
    Won balls, offensive half2423
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.330.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.290.24
    Entries into the box per match1613
    Entries into the box against1013
    Pass completion %0.820.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.7
    Passes per match470372
    Passes against per match285303
    Switches of play per match28.131.1
    Long balls per match2930
    Set piecesMiddlesbroughWolverhampton
    xG from free kicks0.310.04
    Corners per match5.86.3
    Corners against per match5.24.6
    xG per corner0.020.04
    xGA per corner against0.040.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.70.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.730.66
    OtherMiddlesbroughWolverhampton
    Throw-in control0.730.75
    The goalkeepersRadek Vítek (Middlesbrough)José Sá (Wolverhampton)
    Saves2013
    Save %65%65%
    xG prevented45%41%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Middlesbrough vs Wolverhampton according to our model?

    The model gives Middlesbrough a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Middlesbrough 47%, draw 25%, Wolverhampton 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.