EFL League TwoHighbury Stadium, Fleetwood16°0,2 mm25 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood TownLow block & direct
    vs
    RochdaleRochdalePossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Fleetwood Town (53%)Best value by the model: X · Draw @ 3.67 (+4 %)

    Fleetwood Town vs Rochdale · EFL League Two

    1 · Fleetwood Town 53%X 28%19% Rochdale · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Fleetwood Town – Rochdale

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    Fleetwood Town enters this meeting with a 53% chance of victory as per the model, which favors them over Rochdale's 19%. The hosts display a low defense and direct approach, a stark contrast to Rochdale's possession-focused style. This tactical clash might suppress goal-scoring opportunities, aligning with the predicted 44% chance of both teams scoring. The most likely scoreline is 1-0 to Fleetwood, highlighting their edge.

    The hosts possess a slight advantage in both standard points (10 vs 7) and expected points (7.2 vs 6.1). Their expected goals per match stand at 1.1, superior to Rochdale's 0.71, underscoring their offensive edge. Defensively, Fleetwood also leads, conceding fewer expected goals per match (1.4 compared to Rochdale's 1.6), which supports the model’s inclination toward a Fleetwood win and a low-scoring match.

    For bettors, there's a notable value in the under 2.5 goals market. Odds of 1.85 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer a 4% edge, given the model rates this outcome at 56%. With a predicted low-scoring affair and Fleetwood’s tactical discipline, this line emerges as the sharpest angle for potential returns.

    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    Form DDWDL
    League ranking xG #19xGA #17xT #6xP/match #18Points #7
    Key players
    • Chedwyn Michael EvansFxG 0.18 · xT 0.04
    • Andrew Francis CannonRWxG 0.27 · xT 0.07
    • Harrison NealCDMxG 0.05 · xT 0.04
    RochdaleRochdale
    Form LWLDW
    League ranking xG #23xGA #19xT #22xP/match #24Points #16
    Key players
    • Daniel Thomas MossLBxG 0.14 · xT 0.13
    • Luke James HannantRWxG 0.19 · xT 0.05
    • Ryan Henry EastCMxG 0.07 · xT 0.17

    Match prediction: Fleetwood Town – Rochdale

    Predicted score matrix

    Rochdale →
    Fleetwood Town →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.1%
    0–16.6%
    0–22.7%
    0–30.7%
    0–4+0.2%
    1
    1–014.2%
    1–111.7%
    1–24.4%
    1–31.2%
    1–4+0.3%
    2
    2–012.0%
    2–19.3%
    2–23.7%
    2–31.0%
    2–4+0.2%
    3
    3–06.6%
    3–15.1%
    3–22.0%
    3–30.5%
    3–4+0.1%
    4+
    4+–03.9%
    4+–13.1%
    4+–21.2%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-014%
    2. 2.2-012%
    3. 3.1-112%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-09%
    Expected goals
    1,65–0,78
    Both teams to score
    44%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,556%
    @1.85EV+4%
    Over 2,544%
    @1.97

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Fleetwood Town to win53%
    • Under 3.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    42%

    Fair odds

    2.38

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Fleetwood Town to win53%
    • Under 2.5 goals56%
    • William James Davies to score24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score44%
    • Over 2.5 goals44%
    • William James Davies to score24%
    • Daniel Thomas Moss to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw28% probability@3.67PinnacleEV+4%reference odds
    • Under 2.556% probability@1.85BetsafeEV+4%reference odds
    • Under 2.556% probability@1.85BetssonEV+4%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Fleetwood TownX2 · Rochdale
    Betsafe1.883.403.95
    Betsson1.883.403.95
    Nordicbet1.883.403.95
    Pinnacle1.89
    EV+ 4%
    3.67
    3.90

    Odds updated 25 Sept, 14:35

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards under 2.5 goals since 20 September — the odds have shortened from 1.99 to 1.85 (−7%).

    1+3 %
    53 %48 %

    1.84 → 1.89

    X-3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.79 → 3.67

    2+2 %
    27 %22 %

    3.82 → 3.90

    Over 2,5+9 %
    53 %48 %

    1.81 → 1.97

    Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 20/09/2026 → 25/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Fleetwood Town
    Rochdale
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Fleetwood Town (8–7)
    Rochdale (7–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Finley Potter: 202 passningar, xT 0.32PotterHarrison Neal: 165 passningar, xT 0.13NealRhys Bennett: 164 passningar, xT 0.39BennettShaun Rooney: 140 passningar, xT 0.38RooneyLewis McCann: 105 passningar, xT 0.35McCannMark Helm: 101 passningar, xT 0.61HelmDaniel Kenny Andrew: 98 passningar, xT 0.77AndrewJay Lynch: 95 passningar, xT 0.23LynchAdam Murphy: 44 passningar, xT -0.01MurphyRonan Coughlan: 36 passningar, xT 0.15CoughlanConor Haughey: 36 passningar, xT 0.11Haughey
    Rochdale
    Kaiden Carlton Anthony Wilson: 218 passningar, xT 0.17WilsonDaniel Thomas Moss: 215 passningar, xT 0.59MossNils Ramming: 174 passningar, xT 0.27RammingBabajide Ezekiel Adeeko: 130 passningar, xT -0.02AdeekoEdward Albert Francis: 110 passningar, xT -0.01FrancisCharlie Tasker: 103 passningar, xT 0.36TaskerKane Taylor: 95 passningar, xT 0.3TaylorHarvey James Gilmour: 93 passningar, xT -0.07GilmourLuke James Hannant: 69 passningar, xT 0.17HannantOlutobi Adebayo-Rowling: 67 passningar, xT 0.12Adebayo-RowlingEthan Reid Ebanks-Landell: 66 passningar, xT -0.01Ebanks-Landell
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Finley Potter: 202 passningar, xT 0.32PotterHarrison Neal: 165 passningar, xT 0.13NealRhys Bennett: 164 passningar, xT 0.39BennettShaun Rooney: 140 passningar, xT 0.38RooneyLewis McCann: 105 passningar, xT 0.35McCannMark Helm: 101 passningar, xT 0.61HelmDaniel Kenny Andrew: 98 passningar, xT 0.77AndrewJay Lynch: 95 passningar, xT 0.23LynchAdam Murphy: 44 passningar, xT -0.01MurphyRonan Coughlan: 36 passningar, xT 0.15CoughlanConor Haughey: 36 passningar, xT 0.11Haughey
    Rochdale
    Kaiden Carlton Anthony Wilson: 218 passningar, xT 0.17WilsonDaniel Thomas Moss: 215 passningar, xT 0.59MossNils Ramming: 174 passningar, xT 0.27RammingBabajide Ezekiel Adeeko: 130 passningar, xT -0.02AdeekoEdward Albert Francis: 110 passningar, xT -0.01FrancisCharlie Tasker: 103 passningar, xT 0.36TaskerKane Taylor: 95 passningar, xT 0.3TaylorHarvey James Gilmour: 93 passningar, xT -0.07GilmourLuke James Hannant: 69 passningar, xT 0.17HannantOlutobi Adebayo-Rowling: 67 passningar, xT 0.12Adebayo-RowlingEthan Reid Ebanks-Landell: 66 passningar, xT -0.01Ebanks-Landell

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFleetwood TownRochdale
    Points107
    xPoints7.26.1
    xG per match1.10.71
    xGA per match1.41.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.130.09
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.20.3
    Playing styleFleetwood TownRochdale
    Build-up efficiency0.340.29
    Field tilt0.510.37
    xT per match0.990.62
    xTA per match11.2
    Won balls, offensive half2916
    Pressing intensity0.220.22
    Pressing efficiency0.350.29
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.370.23
    Entries into the box per match117
    Entries into the box against1115
    Pass completion %0.660.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.7
    Passes per match281340
    Passes against per match281310
    Switches of play per match18.620
    Long balls per match3132
    Set piecesFleetwood TownRochdale
    xG from free kicks0.060.01
    Corners per match4.83.6
    Corners against per match5.25.6
    xG per corner0.040.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.450.36
    First touch, defensive corners %0.530.56
    OtherFleetwood TownRochdale
    Throw-in control0.670.75
    The goalkeepersJay Lynch (Fleetwood Town)Nils Ramming (Rochdale)
    Saves1521
    Save %68%68%
    xG prevented35%38%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Fleetwood Town vs Rochdale according to our model?

    The model gives Fleetwood Town a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fleetwood Town 53%, draw 28%, Rochdale 19%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 44% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.