01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Fleetwood Town to win53%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL League TwoHighbury Stadium, Fleetwood16°0,2 mm25 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Fleetwood Town enters this meeting with a 53% chance of victory as per the model, which favors them over Rochdale's 19%. The hosts display a low defense and direct approach, a stark contrast to Rochdale's possession-focused style. This tactical clash might suppress goal-scoring opportunities, aligning with the predicted 44% chance of both teams scoring. The most likely scoreline is 1-0 to Fleetwood, highlighting their edge.
The hosts possess a slight advantage in both standard points (10 vs 7) and expected points (7.2 vs 6.1). Their expected goals per match stand at 1.1, superior to Rochdale's 0.71, underscoring their offensive edge. Defensively, Fleetwood also leads, conceding fewer expected goals per match (1.4 compared to Rochdale's 1.6), which supports the model’s inclination toward a Fleetwood win and a low-scoring match.
For bettors, there's a notable value in the under 2.5 goals market. Odds of 1.85 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer a 4% edge, given the model rates this outcome at 56%. With a predicted low-scoring affair and Fleetwood’s tactical discipline, this line emerges as the sharpest angle for potential returns.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Fleetwood Town | X | 2 · Rochdale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.88 | 3.40 | 3.95 |
| Betsson | 1.88 | 3.40 | 3.95 |
| Nordicbet | 1.88 | 3.40 | 3.95 |
| Pinnacle | 1.89 | EV+ 4% 3.67 | 3.90 |
Odds updated 25 Sept, 14:35
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards under 2.5 goals since 20 September — the odds have shortened from 1.99 to 1.85 (−7%).
1.84 → 1.89
3.79 → 3.67
3.82 → 3.90
1.81 → 1.97
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 20/09/2026 → 25/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Fleetwood Town | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 7 |
| xPoints | 7.2 | 6.1 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 0.71 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.13 | 0.09 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | Fleetwood Town | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.51 | 0.37 |
| xT per match | 0.99 | 0.62 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 16 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.35 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.37 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 281 | 340 |
| Passes against per match | 281 | 310 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.6 | 20 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Fleetwood Town | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 3.6 |
| Corners against per match | 5.2 | 5.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.36 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| Other | Fleetwood Town | Rochdale |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Jay Lynch (Fleetwood Town) | Nils Ramming (Rochdale) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 15 | 21 |
| Save % | 68% | 68% |
| xG prevented | 35% | 38% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Fleetwood Town a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fleetwood Town 53%, draw 28%, Rochdale 19%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 44% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.