01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Port Vale to win56%
- Under 3.5 goals84%
EFL League TwoVale Park, Stoke-on-Trent13°16 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
A clash of defensive prowess looms as Port Vale host Northampton Town in League Two. Both sides favor possession control, making this a battle of attrition rather than an explosive showcase. With the match promising to be a tightly contested affair, Port Vale holds the upper hand with a 56% chance of victory. The most likely scorelines, a narrow 1-0 victory or a goalless draw, underscore the defensive focus expected from both teams.
Port Vale's expected goals of 1.34 and Northampton Town's 0.73 further illustrate the hosts' slight advantage. Despite trailing Northampton by one point in the standings, Vale's underlying numbers suggest they've been the better side overall. They boast an xPoints advantage of 8.0 to 7.1 and a higher xG per match at 0.98 compared to their visitors' 0.68. The defensive solidness is mirrored by their xGA, which at 1.1 is only marginally higher than Northampton's 1.0.
While the model leans towards Port Vale, the potential for a low-scoring outcome is high, as highlighted by the 34% probability for over 2.5 goals and 39% for both teams to score. The even possession control styles might lead to a cautious contest, where both teams focus on maintaining shape and minimizing risks. The tight odds of a 1-0 win for Vale or a 0-0 stalemate reflect this narrative.
The numbers suggest backing the hosts in a restrained, methodical encounter, where defensive discipline may well decide the outcome.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Port Vale | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 6 |
| xPoints | 8 | 7.1 |
| xG per match | 0.98 | 0.68 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.42 | 0.22 |
| Playing style | Port Vale | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.54 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| xTA per match | 0.43 | 0.68 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 9 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.63 | 0.68 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.61 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 247 | 278 |
| Passes against per match | 243 | 309 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.4 | 15 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 21 |
| Set pieces | Port Vale | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 5.2 |
| Corners against per match | 4.6 | 2.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.42 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.66 | 0.59 |
| Other | Port Vale | Northampton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Jackson William Smith (Port Vale) | Zachary Anton John Jeacock (Northampton Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 10 | 17 |
| Save % | 59% | 74% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 41% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Port Vale a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Port Vale 56%, draw 28%, Northampton Town 16%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 17% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 34% and under at 66%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 39% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.