EFL League TwoHighbury Stadium, Fleetwood16°36 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood TownLow block & direct
    20
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury TownCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Fleetwood Town (54%)

    Fleetwood TownShrewsbury Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Fleetwood Town 54%X 25%21% Shrewsbury Town · 2

    Analysis: Fleetwood TownShrewsbury Town

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    FAKTA and TEXT comparison reveals a factual issue: the text claims Fleetwood’s "stability at the back" and "defensive solidity" have been crucial, but the data shows Shrewsbury has the edge in xGA (1.1 vs Fleetwood’s 1.4), meaning Fleetwood’s defense is actually the weaker metric. This claim contradicts the provided facts and should be corrected.

    Corrected text:

    Fleetwood Town's unbeaten run of eight matches in League Two sets them up as the more composed side heading into their clash with Shrewsbury Town. The numbers reveal a likely pattern of play: the hosts favor a low defensive line coupled with direct play, while the visitors rely on counter-attacks and crosses. Fleetwood’s recent unbeaten form has been crucial to their standing, suggesting a game where control and discipline might take precedence over flair and risk.

    The model gives Fleetwood a 54% chance of victory, supported by a narrow edge in the head-to-head results since 2023. In two encounters, Shrewsbury has yet to claim a win, though the head-to-head sample is small and thus less significant than current form. Fleetwood’s expected goals tally of 1.58 compared to Shrewsbury’s 0.96 hints at a possible edge in creative output. Despite this, Shrewsbury's xPoints, xG, and xGA metrics suggest they have been slightly more efficient in attack and defense across this season.

    With both sides' xG per match under 1.5 and their playing styles not typically yielding high-scoring affairs, a low-scoring game seems likely. The model’s predicted scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0 reflect this, with an over 2.5 goals probability sitting just under 50%. These figures, combined with the teams' tactical approaches, lean towards a tight and possibly low-scoring match.

    For those seeking betting value, the home win offers a slight edge. Fleetwood Town’s odds of 1.88 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet provide a slim positive expected value, aligning with the model’s assessment. While not a guarantee, this represents a calculated approach to profit from Fleetwood’s current momentum in what should be a controlled encounter.

    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    Form DWDDD
    League ranking xG #16xGA #14xT #7xP/match #18Points #12
    Key players
    • William James DaviesFxG 0.26 · xT 0.00
    • Andrew Francis CannonRWxG 0.27 · xT 0.07
    • Lewis McCannLWxG 0.11 · xT 0.14
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury Town
    Form LLLWL
    League ranking xG #13xGA #8xT #6xP/match #10Points #22
    Key players
    • Tom SangRWxG 0.00 · xT 0.27
    • Luca Anthony HooleCBxG 0.04 · xT 0.11
    • William Sam Douglas Harry BoyleCBxG 0.23 · xT 0.06
    Final score
    20
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Fleetwood Town 54% · Draw 25% · Shrewsbury Town 21%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - FleetwoodBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,35fair 8,35-12 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - ShrewsburyBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 15,92fair 22,51-29 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Fleetwood TownShrewsbury Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Shrewsbury Town
    Fleetwood Town
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.2%
    0–17.2%
    0–23.6%
    0–31.1%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–012.1%
    1–112.3%
    1–25.7%
    1–31.8%
    1–4+0.5%
    2
    2–09.9%
    2–19.5%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.4%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–05.2%
    3–15.0%
    3–22.4%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–02.9%
    4+–12.8%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.2-010%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,580,96
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,553%
    @1.80
    Over 2,547%
    @2.07

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Fleetwood Town to win54%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    37%

    Fair odds

    2.72

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Fleetwood Town to win54%
    • Under 2.5 goals53%
    • Chedwyn Michael Evans to score32%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals47%
    • Chedwyn Michael Evans to score32%
    • Tommy Vincent McDermott to be booked18%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Fleetwood Town54% probability@1.93PinnacleEV+4%reference odds
    • 1 · Fleetwood Town54% probability@1.91Bet365EV+3%reference odds
    • 1 · Fleetwood Town54% probability@1.88BetsafeEV+1%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Fleetwood TownX2 · Shrewsbury Town
    Bet365
    EV+ 3%
    1.91
    3.303.70
    Betfair Exchange1.101.101.10
    Betsafe
    EV+ 1%
    1.88
    3.403.95
    Betsson
    EV+ 1%
    1.88
    3.403.95
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 1%
    1.88
    3.403.95
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 4%
    1.93
    3.534.02

    Odds updated 5 Sept, 10:32

    Odds movement

    1+2 %
    52 %47 %

    1.881.93

    X-1 %
    29 %24 %

    3.563.53

    2+3 %
    26 %21 %

    3.904.02

    Over 2,5+2 %
    49 %44 %

    2.032.07

    Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 02/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Fleetwood Town 1Draw 1Shrewsbury Town 0
    Goals: 53 (⌀ 4)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Fleetwood Town are unbeaten in their last 8 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Fleetwood Town
    Shrewsbury Town
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Fleetwood Town (43)
    Shrewsbury Town (28)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 156 passningar, xT 0.19NealFinley Potter: 145 passningar, xT 0.22PotterShaun Rooney: 133 passningar, xT 0.51RooneyRhys Bennett: 132 passningar, xT 0.16BennettMark Helm: 91 passningar, xT 0.41HelmLewis McCann: 88 passningar, xT 0.17McCannJay Lynch: 85 passningar, xT 0.23LynchRaffaele Cirino: 55 passningar, xT 0.07CirinoAndrew Francis Cannon: 54 passningar, xT 0.1CannonDaniel Kenny Andrew: 50 passningar, xT 0.71AndrewChedwyn Michael Evans: 33 passningar, xT 0.03Evans
    Shrewsbury Town
    Tom Sang: 95 passningar, xT 0.98SangLuca Anthony Hoole: 95 passningar, xT 0.36HooleKevin Berkoe: 94 passningar, xT 0.42BerkoeWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 79 passningar, xT 0.22BoyleJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 73 passningar, xT 0.07RuffelsWill Gary: 72 passningar, xT 0.18GaryWilliam Michael Brook: 62 passningar, xT 0.14BrookArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 59 passningar, xT 1.06Jude-BoydIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 51 passningar, xT 0.33FletcherTom Anderson: 43 passningar, xT 0.2AndersonJay Turner-Cooke: 29 passningar, xT 0.07Turner-Cooke
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 156 passningar, xT 0.19NealFinley Potter: 145 passningar, xT 0.22PotterShaun Rooney: 133 passningar, xT 0.51RooneyRhys Bennett: 132 passningar, xT 0.16BennettMark Helm: 91 passningar, xT 0.41HelmLewis McCann: 88 passningar, xT 0.17McCannJay Lynch: 85 passningar, xT 0.23LynchRaffaele Cirino: 55 passningar, xT 0.07CirinoAndrew Francis Cannon: 54 passningar, xT 0.1CannonDaniel Kenny Andrew: 50 passningar, xT 0.71AndrewChedwyn Michael Evans: 33 passningar, xT 0.03Evans
    Shrewsbury Town
    Tom Sang: 95 passningar, xT 0.98SangLuca Anthony Hoole: 95 passningar, xT 0.36HooleKevin Berkoe: 94 passningar, xT 0.42BerkoeWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 79 passningar, xT 0.22BoyleJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 73 passningar, xT 0.07RuffelsWill Gary: 72 passningar, xT 0.18GaryWilliam Michael Brook: 62 passningar, xT 0.14BrookArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 59 passningar, xT 1.06Jude-BoydIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 51 passningar, xT 0.33FletcherTom Anderson: 43 passningar, xT 0.2AndersonJay Turner-Cooke: 29 passningar, xT 0.07Turner-Cooke

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFleetwood TownShrewsbury Town
    Points63
    xPoints4.65.8
    xG per match1.11.3
    xGA per match1.41.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.150.08
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.20.21
    Playing styleFleetwood TownShrewsbury Town
    Build-up efficiency0.340.33
    Field tilt0.510.42
    xT per match1.11.1
    xTA per match0.950.72
    Won balls, offensive half2932
    Pressing intensity0.220.23
    Pressing efficiency0.310.33
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.320.3
    Entries into the box per match1213
    Entries into the box against1011
    Pass completion %0.660.6
    Pass completion % under pressure0.650.57
    Passes per match285210
    Passes against per match302326
    Switches of play per match19.814.9
    Long balls per match3527
    Set piecesFleetwood TownShrewsbury Town
    xG from free kicks0.090.17
    Corners per match5.85.1
    Corners against per match4.54
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.040.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.430.4
    First touch, defensive corners %0.590.69
    OtherFleetwood TownShrewsbury Town
    Throw-in control0.690.79
    The goalkeepersJay Lynch (Fleetwood Town)William Sam Douglas Harry Boyle (Shrewsbury Town)
    Saves116
    Save %79%100%
    xG prevented58%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Fleetwood Town vs Shrewsbury Town according to our model?

    The model gives Fleetwood Town a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fleetwood Town 54%, draw 25%, Shrewsbury Town 21%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.