01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Grimsby Town to win58%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
EFL League TwoWhaddon Road, Cheltenham16°15 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Grimsby Town's unbeaten run in their last five league matches and their 58% win probability highlight the likely outcome against Cheltenham Town. Despite Cheltenham currently having more points in the standings — 7 to Grimsby's 6 — the underlying metrics paint a different picture. Grimsby's expected goals (xG) per match stand at a solid 1.9, well above Cheltenham's 1.1, indicating a more potent attack.
The head-to-head record since 2023, albeit from a small sample of four matches, shows Grimsby with three wins and one draw. While head-to-head can sometimes mislead when the sample is limited, Grimsby’s current form combined with their superior xG and xGA metrics make their advantage clear. Cheltenham's defensive vulnerabilities are evident, conceding an average of 1.6 xGA per match, which could be exploited by Grimsby's controlling style of play.
The model's most likely scorelines, such as 1-1 and 0-1, suggest a tight affair, but with Grimsby edging it. The expected goals tally leans towards a modest scoreline, further supported by an over 2.5 goals probability of just 48%. Both teams might find the net, given the 51% probability for both teams to score, yet Grimsby’s defensive metrics could keep Cheltenham at bay.
The betting value is clear: Grimsby to win at 1.92 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offers an 11% edge over the market. This is where the sharpest play lies. The numbers suggest a 0-1 or 1-2 result, aligning with Grimsby’s attacking and defensive strengths, a script Cheltenham will struggle to rewrite.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cheltenham Town | X | 2 · Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 3.00 | 3.30 | EV+ 27% 2.20 |
| Betfair Exchange | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.10 |
| Betsafe | 3.70 | 3.45 | EV+ 11% 1.92 |
| Betsson | 3.70 | 3.45 | EV+ 11% 1.92 |
| Nordicbet | 3.70 | 3.45 | EV+ 11% 1.92 |
| Pinnacle | 3.51 | 3.69 | EV+ 17% 2.03 |
Odds updated 5 Sept, 10:33
3.50 → 3.51
3.61 → 3.69
1.99 → 2.03
1.74 → 1.75
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 02/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cheltenham Town | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 6 |
| xPoints | 4.7 | 5.9 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.28 | 0.37 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | Cheltenham Town | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.37 | 0.57 |
| xT per match | 0.71 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.92 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 36 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.32 | 0.41 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.62 | 0.67 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.58 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 251 | 291 |
| Passes against per match | 337 | 241 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.9 | 21.8 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 35 |
| Set pieces | Cheltenham Town | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 4.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.3 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.56 |
| Other | Cheltenham Town | Grimsby Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Wylliam Sam Stanway (Cheltenham Town) | Christy James Pym (Grimsby Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 9 |
| Save % | 53% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 25% | 45% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Grimsby Town a 58% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cheltenham Town 21%, draw 21%, Grimsby Town 58%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.