01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Salford City to win53%
- Under 3.5 goals80%
EFL League TwoPeninsula Stadium, Salford9°10 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Salford City vs Exeter City (EFL League Two, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Salford City win 53%, draw 25%, Exeter City win 22%. Expected goals (xG): Salford City 1.45, Exeter City 0.86. Most likely score: 1-0 (14%). Over 2.5 goals 41%, both teams to score 44%. Double chance: Salford City or draw 78%, Exeter City or draw 47%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
The 53 home matches figure is stated as "all-time" in the facts, not "since 2023" — that detail is fabricated.
CORRECTED TEXT:
Salford City are the right favourites, but the sharper read is a controlled, low-scoring home win: 1-0 is the most likely scoreline at 14%, and under 2.5 goals is the lean with the over rated only 41%. Exeter City arrive unbeaten in five league matches, so this is not a case for blindly chasing the hosts’ price.
Six straight wins give Salford real momentum, and they have scored in nine consecutive league matches. Their underlying numbers support a narrow edge rather than a rout: 1.3 xG per match against Exeter’s 1.1, plus 1.0 xGA versus the visitors’ 1.1. Both sides profile as possession-control teams. That points towards fewer transitions and a match settled by small margins.
The table says 25 points to 19 in Salford’s favour. The xPoints table pushes back, though: Exeter lead 19.1 to 17.1. That gap matters. Salford’s winning run has lifted the surface numbers beyond what their chance quality fully justifies, while Exeter have been more efficient in the underlying season picture than their points total suggests.
Still, the hosts have a solid home base. Across 53 home matches all-time, they have won 55%. Combine that with the model’s 53% Salford win probability, against 25% for the draw and 22% for Exeter, and the home side remains the logical pick. The 1-1 scoreline is close behind at 13%, with 2-0 at 10%, but the central case is Salford edging a tight contest.
The standout value assessment is at the extreme low end: under 0.5 goals at 13.0 with Betsafe and Nordicbet, where the model rates the outcome at 10% for a 34% edge. Under 1.5 goals at 3.7 with Betsafe is less explosive but more practical, rated 33% by the model for a 20% edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Salford City | X | 2 · Exeter City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.58 | 3.85 | EV+ 17% 5.40 |
| LeoVegas | 1.61 | 3.85 | EV+ 3% 4.75 |
| Nordicbet | 1.58 | 3.85 | EV+ 17% 5.40 |
Odds updated 26 Oct, 21:36
1.62 → 1.58
3.85 → 3.85
4.90 → 5.40
1.78 → 1.75
Nordicbet · 6 recorded price levels · 25/10/2026 → 26/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Salford City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 25 | 19 |
| xPoints | 17.1 | 19.1 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.15 |
| Playing style | Salford City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.36 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.58 | 0.44 |
| xT per match | 0.8 | 0.66 |
| xTA per match | 0.63 | 0.81 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.4 | 0.38 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.64 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 337 | 241 |
| Passes against per match | 223 | 293 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.1 | 17.5 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Salford City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 6 | 4.3 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 4.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.52 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.68 | 0.53 |
| Other | Salford City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | William James Norris (Salford City) | Jack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 31 | 36 |
| Save % | 72% | 84% |
| xG prevented | 46% | 56% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Salford City a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Salford City 53%, draw 25%, Exeter City 22%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 41% and under at 59%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 44% according to the model.
The model expects 1.45 goals (xG) for Salford City and 0.86 for Exeter City, 2.31 in total.
Salford City or draw (1X) 78%, Exeter City or draw (X2) 47% and no draw (12) 75%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.