EFL League TwoPrenton Park, Birkenhead10°13 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Tranmere RoversTranmere RoversCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    Cheltenham TownCheltenham TownLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Tranmere Rovers (45%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.05 (+7 %)

    Tranmere Rovers vs Cheltenham Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Tranmere Rovers 45%X 28%27% Cheltenham Town · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Tranmere Rovers vs Cheltenham Town (EFL League Two, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Tranmere Rovers win 45%, draw 28%, Cheltenham Town win 27%. Expected goals (xG): Tranmere Rovers 1.55, Cheltenham Town 1.05. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 48%, both teams to score 51%. Double chance: Tranmere Rovers or draw 73%, Cheltenham Town or draw 55%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Tranmere Rovers – Cheltenham Town

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    Tranmere Rovers’ crossing and counter-attacking unit is the pressure point. Cheltenham Town defend low and play direct, a profile that can invite the hosts onto the flanks but also reduce the space for clean chances in central areas. The model gives Tranmere a 45% win probability against 27% for the visitors, with the draw at 28%. That points to the hosts, though the most likely individual scoreline is 1-1 at 12%, ahead of 1-0 at 11% and 2-1 at 9%.

    The tactical tension is clear: Tranmere want transitions and deliveries; Cheltenham want to stay compact, absorb pressure and go forward quickly. The hosts carry the better attacking process at 1.2 xG per match versus 1.1, while their match projection is 1.55 expected goals to Cheltenham’s 1.05. Yet this is not a case for assuming sustained home control. Both teams concede 1.6 xGA per match, although Cheltenham hold the stated edge there, and the visitors have the stronger points total, 21 to 16, plus a 17.4 to 16.5 edge in xPoints.

    That split matters. Cheltenham’s season return has been better than Tranmere’s, but the matchup model still prefers the hosts because their route to chances fits the visitors’ low defensive block: win territory, attack wide, and turn second balls into crossing situations. Cheltenham’s direct game can keep the contest uncomfortable, particularly if Tranmere’s full-backs push high. Both teams to score is rated at 51%, so a narrow game with one reply remains very live.

    The head-to-head since 2023 reads 4 matches, with Tranmere 3W 0D 1L. It is a small sample and weighs less than current form and expected goals, but it supports the idea that this fixture has suited the hosts more than the broader points picture suggests. My call is a Tranmere lean, with 1-1 the most likely scoreline and under 2.5 goals the stronger totals stance. LeoVegas’ under 2.5 at 2.1 is assessed as EV+ at 52%, a 9% edge; under 1.5 at 4.1 is also rated 26% with a 9% edge, while under 3.5 at 1.44 carries a 74% model rating and 6% edge.

    Tranmere RoversTranmere Rovers
    Form LDLWD
    League ranking xG #12xGA #21xT #18xP/match #18Points #14
    Key players
    • William Robert VaulksCMxG 0.06 · xT 0.09
    • Thomas Christopher InceRWxG 0.24 · xT 0.07
    • Zane OkoroRWxG 0.23 · xT -0.03
    Cheltenham TownCheltenham Town
    Form LLLWW
    League ranking xG #19xGA #20xT #24xP/match #15Points #3
    Key players
    • Charlie Liam McCannCAMxG 0.24 · xT 0.09
    • James Steven WilsonCBxG 0.10 · xT 0.05
    • Robbie David CundyCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.03

    Match prediction: Tranmere Rovers – Cheltenham Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Cheltenham Town →
    Tranmere Rovers →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.8%
    0–17.5%
    0–24.1%
    0–31.4%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–011.2%
    1–112.5%
    1–26.3%
    1–32.2%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–08.9%
    2–19.4%
    2–24.9%
    2–31.7%
    2–4+0.6%
    3
    3–04.6%
    3–14.8%
    3–22.5%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–02.5%
    4+–12.6%
    4+–21.4%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-09%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,55–1,05
    Both teams to score
    51%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,552%
    @2.05EV+3%
    Over 2,548%
    @1.77

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Tranmere Rovers to win45%
    • Under 3.5 goals74%

    Combined probability

    34%

    Fair odds

    2.94

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Tranmere Rovers to win45%
    • Under 2.5 goals52%
    • Joe Samuel Ironside to score29%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score51%
    • Over 2.5 goals48%
    • Joe Samuel Ironside to score29%
    • Ben Edward Stevenson to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.552% probability@2.05LeoVegasEV+7%reference odds
    • Under 2.552% probability@2.02PinnacleEV+5%reference odds
    • 2 · Cheltenham Town27% probability@3.95BetsafeEV+5%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Tranmere RoversX2 · Cheltenham Town
    Betsafe1.82
    EV+ 1%
    3.60
    EV+ 5%
    3.95
    LeoVegas1.883.503.70
    Nordicbet1.82
    EV+ 1%
    3.60
    EV+ 5%
    3.95
    Pinnacle1.85
    EV+ 5%
    3.71
    EV+ 3%
    3.87

    Odds updated 26 Oct, 18:36

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Tranmere Rovers 3Draw 0Cheltenham Town 1
    Goals: 8–4 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Tranmere Rovers
    Cheltenham Town
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Tranmere Rovers (16–16)
    Cheltenham Town (22–22)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Tranmere Rovers
    William Robert Vaulks: 175 passningar, xT 0.23VaulksJacob Vaughan Slater: 130 passningar, xT 1.27SlaterThomas Christopher Ince: 123 passningar, xT 0.42InceJoel Toby Senior: 106 passningar, xT 0.31SeniorGeorge Patrick Nevett: 104 passningar, xT 0.43NevettTom George Sawyer Conlon: 102 passningar, xT 0.13ConlonLee Oconnor: 78 passningar, xT 0.2OconnorBobby Faulkner: 76 passningar, xT 0.07FaulknerHarrison Male: 70 passningar, xT 0.14MaleNathan Smith: 64 passningar, xT -0.01SmithCharlie Whitaker: 55 passningar, xT -0.02Whitaker
    Cheltenham Town
    Pierce Liam Sweeney: 194 passningar, xT 0.35SweeneyJonathan Robert Tomkinson: 155 passningar, xT 0.22TomkinsonWylliam Sam Stanway: 148 passningar, xT 0.08StanwayJordan Mark Edward James Shipley: 141 passningar, xT 0.24ShipleyJames Steven Wilson: 140 passningar, xT 0.19WilsonCharlie Liam McCann: 117 passningar, xT -0.01McCannBen Edward Stevenson: 96 passningar, xT 0.04StevensonAndreas Weimann: 83 passningar, xT 0WeimannJake Evans: 81 passningar, xT 0.37EvansFrederick Henry Arthur Willcox: 80 passningar, xT 0.14WillcoxGeorge Damien Nurse: 79 passningar, xT 0.03Nurse
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Tranmere Rovers
    William Robert Vaulks: 175 passningar, xT 0.23VaulksJacob Vaughan Slater: 130 passningar, xT 1.27SlaterThomas Christopher Ince: 123 passningar, xT 0.42InceJoel Toby Senior: 106 passningar, xT 0.31SeniorGeorge Patrick Nevett: 104 passningar, xT 0.43NevettTom George Sawyer Conlon: 102 passningar, xT 0.13ConlonLee Oconnor: 78 passningar, xT 0.2OconnorBobby Faulkner: 76 passningar, xT 0.07FaulknerHarrison Male: 70 passningar, xT 0.14MaleNathan Smith: 64 passningar, xT -0.01SmithCharlie Whitaker: 55 passningar, xT -0.02Whitaker
    Cheltenham Town
    Pierce Liam Sweeney: 194 passningar, xT 0.35SweeneyJonathan Robert Tomkinson: 155 passningar, xT 0.22TomkinsonWylliam Sam Stanway: 148 passningar, xT 0.08StanwayJordan Mark Edward James Shipley: 141 passningar, xT 0.24ShipleyJames Steven Wilson: 140 passningar, xT 0.19WilsonCharlie Liam McCann: 117 passningar, xT -0.01McCannBen Edward Stevenson: 96 passningar, xT 0.04StevensonAndreas Weimann: 83 passningar, xT 0WeimannJake Evans: 81 passningar, xT 0.37EvansFrederick Henry Arthur Willcox: 80 passningar, xT 0.14WillcoxGeorge Damien Nurse: 79 passningar, xT 0.03Nurse

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceTranmere RoversCheltenham Town
    Points1621
    xPoints16.517.4
    xG per match1.21.1
    xGA per match1.61.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.250.29
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.150.22
    Playing styleTranmere RoversCheltenham Town
    Build-up efficiency0.340.33
    Field tilt0.40.36
    xT per match0.730.53
    xTA per match1.11.1
    Won balls, offensive half2921
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.350.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.3
    Entries into the box per match107
    Entries into the box against1316
    Pass completion %0.650.65
    Pass completion % under pressure0.620.61
    Passes per match252273
    Passes against per match297338
    Switches of play per match16.217.7
    Long balls per match3427
    Set piecesTranmere RoversCheltenham Town
    xG from free kicks0.030
    Corners per match4.44.1
    Corners against per match65.8
    xG per corner0.030.04
    xGA per corner against0.030.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.34
    First touch, defensive corners %0.540.66
    OtherTranmere RoversCheltenham Town
    Throw-in control0.730.64
    The goalkeepersLuke Paul McGee (Tranmere Rovers)Wylliam Sam Stanway (Cheltenham Town)
    Saves2134
    Save %75%62%
    xG prevented54%38%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Tranmere Rovers vs Cheltenham Town according to our model?

    The model gives Tranmere Rovers a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Tranmere Rovers 45%, draw 28%, Cheltenham Town 27%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Tranmere Rovers vs Cheltenham Town?

    The model expects 1.55 goals (xG) for Tranmere Rovers and 1.05 for Cheltenham Town, 2.59 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Tranmere Rovers or draw (1X) 73%, Cheltenham Town or draw (X2) 55% and no draw (12) 72%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.