EFL League TwoNew Meadow, Shrewsbury8°8 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury TownLow block & direct
    vs
    GillinghamGillinghamLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Shrewsbury Town (45%)Best value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 3.20 (+7 %)

    Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham · EFL League Two

    1 · Shrewsbury Town 45%X 31%24% Gillingham · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham (EFL League Two, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Shrewsbury Town win 45%, draw 31%, Gillingham win 24%. Expected goals (xG): Shrewsbury Town 1.35, Gillingham 0.92. Most likely score: 1-0 (14%). Over 2.5 goals 39%, both teams to score 45%. Double chance: Shrewsbury Town or draw 76%, Gillingham or draw 55%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Shrewsbury Town – Gillingham

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    0.92 expected goals for Gillingham is the starting point. Shrewsbury Town are rated 45% to win, against 31% for the draw and 24% for the visitors. The analysis points plainly to the hosts, with 1-0 the most likely scoreline at 14%. Over 2.5 goals sits at just 39%, so the lean is under.

    Both sides are low-defence, direct profiles, but Shrewsbury’s season numbers carry the stronger case: 22.0 xPoints to 17.3, 1.5 xG per match to 1.1, and 0.94 xGA to 1.4. Their 18 points also edge Gillingham’s 17. The head-to-head since 2023 is 0W 1D 1L from 2 matches; that sample is small and weighs less than form and expected goals.

    The sharper angle is under 1.5 goals: LeoVegas offers 3.2, assessed as EV+ with the model rating it 34% for a 7% edge. Betsafe and Nordicbet are 3.15, each assessed at a 6% edge. Dull football, a 1-0 home win, and under 1.5 at LeoVegas.

    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury Town
    Form WLWWD
    League ranking xG #8xGA #1xT #7xP/match #2Points #10
    Key players
    • Sam StubbsCBxG 0.10 · xT 0.12
    • Tom SangRWxG 0.03 · xT 0.17
    • Kian McMahon-BrownLWxG 0.18 · xT 0.07
    GillinghamGillingham
    Form DWLDL
    League ranking xG #20xGA #16xT #19xP/match #16Points #12
    Key players
    • Omar Jerome BecklesCBxG 0.09 · xT 0.04
    • Garath James McClearyRWxG 0.02 · xT 0.11
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleLWxG 0.30 · xT -0.01

    Match prediction: Shrewsbury Town – Gillingham

    Predicted score matrix

    Gillingham →
    Shrewsbury Town →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–010.8%
    0–19.2%
    0–24.4%
    0–31.3%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–013.6%
    1–113.2%
    1–25.9%
    1–31.8%
    1–4+0.5%
    2
    2–09.4%
    2–18.6%
    2–24.0%
    2–31.2%
    2–4+0.3%
    3
    3–04.2%
    3–13.9%
    3–21.8%
    3–30.5%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.9%
    4+–11.8%
    4+–20.8%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-014%
    2. 2.1-113%
    3. 3.0-011%
    4. 4.2-09%
    5. 5.0-19%
    Expected goals
    1,35–0,92
    Both teams to score
    45%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,561%
    @1.73EV+4%
    Over 2,539%
    @2.02

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Shrewsbury Town or draw (1X)75%
    • Under 3.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    60%

    Fair odds

    1.67

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Shrewsbury Town or draw (1X)75%
    • Under 2.5 goals61%
    • Joshua Michael Blainey Davison to score26%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score45%
    • Over 2.5 goals39%
    • Joshua Michael Blainey Davison to score26%
    • Andrew John Smith to be booked17%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.534% probability@3.20LeoVegasEV+7%reference odds
    • Under 1.534% probability@3.15BetsafeEV+6%reference odds
    • Under 1.534% probability@3.15NordicbetEV+6%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Shrewsbury TownX2 · Gillingham
    Betsafe1.98
    EV+ 4%
    3.30
    3.70
    LeoVegas1.98
    EV+ 2%
    3.25
    3.55
    Nordicbet1.98
    EV+ 4%
    3.30
    3.70

    Odds updated 26 Oct, 13:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Gillingham win since 24 October — the odds have shortened from 3.95 to 3.55 (−10%).

    1+5 %
    50 %45 %

    1.88 → 1.98

    X-2 %
    30 %25 %

    3.30 → 3.25

    2-10 %
    27 %22 %

    3.95 → 3.55

    Over 2,50 %
    49 %44 %

    1.98 → 1.98

    LeoVegas · 5 recorded price levels · 24/10/2026 → 26/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Shrewsbury Town 0Draw 1Gillingham 1
    Goals: 3–4 (⌀ 3,5)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Shrewsbury Town
    Gillingham
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Shrewsbury Town (16–20)
    Gillingham (18–18)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Shrewsbury Town
    Sam Stubbs: 170 passningar, xT 0.89StubbsJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 160 passningar, xT 0.39RuffelsTom Sang: 110 passningar, xT 0.52SangKevin Berkoe: 103 passningar, xT 1.32BerkoeWilliam Michael Brook: 96 passningar, xT 0.38BrookWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 81 passningar, xT 0.06BoyleJay Turner-Cooke: 77 passningar, xT 0.12Turner-CookeKian McMahon-Brown: 73 passningar, xT 0.24McMahon-BrownWill Gary: 57 passningar, xT 0.25GaryArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 43 passningar, xT 0.53Jude-BoydJoshua Michael Blainey Davison: 35 passningar, xT 0.04Davison
    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 210 passningar, xT 0.29BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 142 passningar, xT 0.36BrophyOliver Lennon George Wright: 135 passningar, xT 0.19WrightAndy Smith: 118 passningar, xT 0.2SmithNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 109 passningar, xT 0.58FreemanLogan Dobbs: 92 passningar, xT 0.06DobbsJack Daley: 89 passningar, xT 0.27DaleyArmani Little: 84 passningar, xT 0.1LittleRobbie Mckenzie: 74 passningar, xT 0.17MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 65 passningar, xT -0.13HaleGarath James McCleary: 45 passningar, xT 0.24McCleary
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Shrewsbury Town
    Sam Stubbs: 170 passningar, xT 0.89StubbsJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 160 passningar, xT 0.39RuffelsTom Sang: 110 passningar, xT 0.52SangKevin Berkoe: 103 passningar, xT 1.32BerkoeWilliam Michael Brook: 96 passningar, xT 0.38BrookWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 81 passningar, xT 0.06BoyleJay Turner-Cooke: 77 passningar, xT 0.12Turner-CookeKian McMahon-Brown: 73 passningar, xT 0.24McMahon-BrownWill Gary: 57 passningar, xT 0.25GaryArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 43 passningar, xT 0.53Jude-BoydJoshua Michael Blainey Davison: 35 passningar, xT 0.04Davison
    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 210 passningar, xT 0.29BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 142 passningar, xT 0.36BrophyOliver Lennon George Wright: 135 passningar, xT 0.19WrightAndy Smith: 118 passningar, xT 0.2SmithNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 109 passningar, xT 0.58FreemanLogan Dobbs: 92 passningar, xT 0.06DobbsJack Daley: 89 passningar, xT 0.27DaleyArmani Little: 84 passningar, xT 0.1LittleRobbie Mckenzie: 74 passningar, xT 0.17MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 65 passningar, xT -0.13HaleGarath James McCleary: 45 passningar, xT 0.24McCleary

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceShrewsbury TownGillingham
    Points1817
    xPoints2217.3
    xG per match1.51.1
    xGA per match0.941.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.290.33
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.130.26
    Playing styleShrewsbury TownGillingham
    Build-up efficiency0.330.33
    Field tilt0.470.4
    xT per match10.68
    xTA per match0.90.96
    Won balls, offensive half3022
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.330.34
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.290.33
    Entries into the box per match138
    Entries into the box against1013
    Pass completion %0.60.63
    Pass completion % under pressure0.570.59
    Passes per match207244
    Passes against per match294307
    Switches of play per match15.717.7
    Long balls per match3030
    Set piecesShrewsbury TownGillingham
    xG from free kicks0.160.06
    Corners per match5.43.6
    Corners against per match4.25.4
    xG per corner0.040.01
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.490.36
    First touch, defensive corners %0.660.6
    OtherShrewsbury TownGillingham
    Throw-in control0.760.74
    The goalkeepersWilliam Michael Brook (Shrewsbury Town)Oliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham)
    Saves2338
    Save %54%76%
    xG prevented39%54%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham according to our model?

    The model gives Shrewsbury Town a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Shrewsbury Town 45%, draw 31%, Gillingham 24%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 39% and under at 61%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham?

    The model expects 1.35 goals (xG) for Shrewsbury Town and 0.92 for Gillingham, 2.26 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Shrewsbury Town or draw (1X) 76%, Gillingham or draw (X2) 55% and no draw (12) 69%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.