01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Borussia Dortmund to win65%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
BundesligaSignal Iduna Park, Dortmund18°0,1 mm12 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Borussia Dortmund's 4-game winning streak provides a solid foundation for their clash against Paderborn, underscoring the hosts' dominance. With a 65% chance of victory according to the model, Dortmund's recent form and historical 71% home win rate make them clear favorites. Paderborn's counter-attacking style may face challenges against Dortmund's possession and high press, limiting their effectiveness.
This match's expected goals further highlight the disparity: Dortmund is projected for 2.28 xG while Paderborn manages just 0.91, and their season averages of 1.9 and 0.87 xG per match respectively point the same way. This aligns with the most likely scorelines, favoring a 2-0 or 2-1 result for the hosts. The 62% probability for over 2.5 goals suggests a reasonable expectation for a few goals, but the model's numbers are a steady reminder to prioritize defensive control over high-scoring gambles.
For those drawn to value bets, Paderborn's win at odds of 12.5 with Betsson presents a 104% edge, given the model's 16% chance for an upset. This is echoed at odds of 12.0 with both Betsafe and Nordicbet, offering a 96% edge. While these are tempting from a value perspective, the data leans heavily towards a disciplined, straightforward play on Dortmund.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Borussia Dortmund | X | 2 · Paderborn |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.24 | EV+ 4% 5.65 | EV+ 88% 11.50 |
| Betsson | 1.25 | EV+ 4% 5.70 | EV+ 88% 11.50 |
| Nordicbet | 1.24 | EV+ 4% 5.65 | EV+ 88% 11.50 |
| Pinnacle | 1.23 | EV+ 32% 7.22 | EV+ 77% 10.86 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 13:38
1.24 → 1.23
6.77 → 7.22
9.18 → 10.86
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Borussia Dortmund | Paderborn |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 1 |
| xPoints | 3.7 | 2.3 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 0.87 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 1 | 0.25 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.3 | 0.25 |
| Playing style | Borussia Dortmund | Paderborn |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.39 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 0.92 |
| xTA per match | 0.95 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 22 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 366 | 411 |
| Passes against per match | 377 | 339 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.3 | 24.1 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Borussia Dortmund | Paderborn |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 3 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 7.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.73 | 0.6 |
| Other | Borussia Dortmund | Paderborn |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.64 | 0.83 |
| The goalkeepers | Gregor Kobel (Borussia Dortmund) | Nahuel Nicolas Noll (Paderborn) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 7 | 8 |
| Save % | 78% | 89% |
| xG prevented | 75% | 85% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Borussia Dortmund a 65% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Borussia Dortmund 65%, draw 18%, Paderborn 16%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.