01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Elversberg or draw (X2)63%
- Under 3.5 goals78%
BundesligaStadion An der Alten Försterei, Berlin12°0,6 mm16 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The model's lean towards a draw at 28% and the most likely scorelines being 1-1, 1-0, and 0-1, further emphasize a tight affair.
This should be corrected, as the model's actual lean is toward SV 07 Elversberg (36%), not the draw. The rest of the text is accurate.
Corrected text:
The most striking feature of the Union Berlin versus Elversberg matchup is the model's equal probability for both teams to win, each at 36%. This presents an unusual tension, especially since the host team has lost three consecutive matches. The struggle is evident not only in results but also in the underlying numbers. With Union Berlin's xG at 1.2 and xGA at a worrying 2.5, the model's lack of preference for them starts to make sense.
Elversberg, while also not a powerhouse, holds a slight statistical edge. Their xG of 1.4 and xGA of 2.1 suggest a marginally more balanced side. The visitors also have seven points against Union's one, backed by an xPoints tally of 5.6 to Berlin's 3.2. Although both teams favor a low defense and direct approach, Elversberg's execution seems more effective at this stage.
Given the narrow expected goals — 1.21 for the hosts and 1.17 for the visitors — the likelihood of a low-scoring game is reinforced. The model's overall lean is towards SV 07 Elversberg, though the draw sits close behind at 28%, and the most likely scorelines being 1-1, 1-0, and 0-1 further emphasize a tight affair. The over 2.5 goals probability sits at just 42%, signaling a strong chance for fewer goals.
For bettors, the under goals market offers considerable value. Under 2.5 goals at odds 2.375 with LeoVegas is particularly enticing, with the model assigning a 58% probability — a striking 37% edge. While under 3.5 at 1.571 also shows value, the sharper play seems to be targeting the lowest goal line. The defensive vulnerabilities and direct styles of play might not yield a glut of goals, but they offer a tantalizing betting opportunity.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Union Berlin | X | 2 · Elversberg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.30 | EV+ 2% 3.60 | EV+ 1% 2.82 |
| LeoVegas | 2.25 | EV+ 6% 3.75 | EV+ 3% 2.88 |
| Nordicbet | 2.30 | EV+ 2% 3.60 | EV+ 1% 2.82 |
Odds updated 4 Oct, 15:36
2.20 → 2.25
3.75 → 3.75
2.90 → 2.88
1.52 → 1.53
LeoVegas · 6 recorded price levels · 02/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Union Berlin | Elversberg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 7 |
| xPoints | 3.2 | 5.6 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 2.5 | 2.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.67 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.45 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Union Berlin | Elversberg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.3 | 0.23 |
| xT per match | 0.88 | 0.59 |
| xTA per match | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 18 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.2 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 22 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 285 | 299 |
| Passes against per match | 387 | 471 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.4 | 17.6 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 22 |
| Set pieces | Union Berlin | Elversberg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.16 |
| Corners per match | 2.9 | 3.7 |
| Corners against per match | 6.6 | 7.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.4 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.72 |
| Other | Union Berlin | Elversberg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Frederik Ronnow (Union Berlin) | Maximilian Rohr (Elversberg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 11 |
| Save % | 56% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Elversberg a 36% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Union Berlin 36%, draw 28%, Elversberg 36%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 42% and under at 58%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.