Norwegian Eliteserien7°3,6 mm24 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    StartStartLow block & direct
    vs
    HamarkamerateneHamarkamerateneLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Start (47%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.26 (+11 %)

    Start vs Hamarkameratene · Norwegian Eliteserien

    1 · Start 47%X 28%25% Hamarkameratene · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Start – Hamarkameratene

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Hamarkameratene's recent slide — three consecutive losses — hangs over their trip to face Start, where the numbers shine a light on a deeper story. Despite trailing the visitors in the actual points tally, Start's xPoints tell a different tale. The hosts have underperformed, sitting at 26.0 xPoints compared to their 16 actual points, highlighting a potential for regression to the mean.

    The expected goals metrics add another layer to the puzzle. Start's edge at 1.54 expected goals against Hamarkameratene's 1.17 suggests that the hosts have the firepower to break through a defense that matches theirs in frailty — each team concedes 1.9 xGA per game. This parity in defensive vulnerability combined with their direct playing styles means chances may well come at both ends, though the rain-soaked conditions could play a part in tempering scoring as it blends into the model's lean figures.

    Yet, Hamarkameratene's raw points advantage cannot be ignored, indicating a knack for grinding out results that belies their xG underperformance. Their singular head-to-head win against Start since 2021, though from a small sample size, nods to a psychological edge. However, the visitors' form has unraveled, setting the stage for Start to exploit their home advantage.

    The model probabilities favor Start at 47% to win, with a 10% chance of a 1-0 triumph standing out among the most likely scorelines. Despite the evenly matched expected goals, the edge in model probabilities aligns with the hosts correcting their underachievement. The over 2.5 goals probability hovers at 51%, suggesting a slight lean towards a higher-scoring affair, but the persistent rain might just tip it towards the under.

    Keep an eye on the visitors' form slump; it may just be the key to unlocking value in this contest.

    StartStart
    Form LWLWL
    League ranking xG #11xGA #15xT #9xP/match #12Points #16
    Key players
    • Jesper Cornelius RasmussenFxG 0.39 · xT 0.10
    • Hakon LorentzenFxG 0.26 · xT 0.01
    • Tom StrannegardLWBxG 0.06 · xT 0.28
    HamarkamerateneHamarkameratene
    Form LDLLL
    League ranking xG #13xGA #12xT #15xP/match #15Points #13
    Key players
    • Henrik UdahlFxG 0.43 · xT 0.02
    • Loris MettlerFxG 0.21 · xT 0.19
    • Mame Alassane NiangFxG 0.37 · xT 0.01

    Match prediction: Start – Hamarkameratene

    Predicted score matrix

    Hamarkameratene →
    Start →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.0%
    0–17.4%
    0–24.6%
    0–31.8%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–09.9%
    1–112.3%
    1–27.0%
    1–32.7%
    1–4+1.0%
    2
    2–07.9%
    2–19.2%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.1%
    2–4+0.8%
    3
    3–04.0%
    3–14.7%
    3–22.8%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–02.2%
    4+–12.6%
    4+–21.5%
    4+–30.6%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-17%
    Expected goals
    1,54–1,17
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,549%
    @2.26EV+11%
    Over 2,551%
    @1.65

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Start to win47%
    • Over 1.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    36%

    Fair odds

    2.82

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Start to win47%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Jesper Cornelius Rasmussen to score23%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Jesper Cornelius Rasmussen to score23%
    • Ethan Amundsen-Day to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.549% probability@2.26PinnacleEV+11%reference odds
    • X · Draw28% probability@3.87PinnacleEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · StartX2 · Hamarkameratene
    Pinnacle1.89
    EV+ 8%
    3.87
    3.76

    Odds updated 2 Oct, 07:04

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    1 matches
    Start 0Draw 0Hamarkameratene 1
    Goals: 1–2 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on Eliteserien data since 2021.

    Key facts

    • Hamarkameratene have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Start
    Hamarkameratene
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Start (22–44)
    Hamarkameratene (29–44)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Start
    Erlend Segberg: 214 passningar, xT 0.25SegbergJens Berland Husebo: 204 passningar, xT 0.29HuseboAltin Ujkani: 182 passningar, xT 0.33UjkaniErlend Dahl Reitan: 168 passningar, xT 0.74ReitanMikael Ugland: 144 passningar, xT -0.01UglandOusmane Diallo Toure: 135 passningar, xT 0.35ToureFilip Manojlović: 91 passningar, xT 0.1ManojlovićStève Regis Mvoué: 83 passningar, xT 0.12MvouéHakon Lorentzen: 81 passningar, xT 0.12LorentzenJohn Olav Norheim: 79 passningar, xT 0.06NorheimSander Aske Granheim: 76 passningar, xT 0.12Granheim
    Hamarkameratene
    Snorre Strand Nilsen: 158 passningar, xT 0.17NilsenEthan Amundsen-Day: 156 passningar, xT 0.12Amundsen-DayLuc Mares: 147 passningar, xT 0.04MaresMarcus Sandberg: 136 passningar, xT 0.33SandbergFredrik Sjolstad: 133 passningar, xT 0.05SjolstadPatrick Metcalfe: 119 passningar, xT 0.37MetcalfeVidar Ari Jonsson: 97 passningar, xT -0.07JonssonAnders Trondsen: 87 passningar, xT 0.23TrondsenMarkus Johnsgard: 79 passningar, xT 0.23JohnsgardAleksander Andresen: 78 passningar, xT 0.26AndresenMartin Gjone: 75 passningar, xT 0.14Gjone
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Start
    Erlend Segberg: 214 passningar, xT 0.25SegbergJens Berland Husebo: 204 passningar, xT 0.29HuseboAltin Ujkani: 182 passningar, xT 0.33UjkaniErlend Dahl Reitan: 168 passningar, xT 0.74ReitanMikael Ugland: 144 passningar, xT -0.01UglandOusmane Diallo Toure: 135 passningar, xT 0.35ToureFilip Manojlović: 91 passningar, xT 0.1ManojlovićStève Regis Mvoué: 83 passningar, xT 0.12MvouéHakon Lorentzen: 81 passningar, xT 0.12LorentzenJohn Olav Norheim: 79 passningar, xT 0.06NorheimSander Aske Granheim: 76 passningar, xT 0.12Granheim
    Hamarkameratene
    Snorre Strand Nilsen: 158 passningar, xT 0.17NilsenEthan Amundsen-Day: 156 passningar, xT 0.12Amundsen-DayLuc Mares: 147 passningar, xT 0.04MaresMarcus Sandberg: 136 passningar, xT 0.33SandbergFredrik Sjolstad: 133 passningar, xT 0.05SjolstadPatrick Metcalfe: 119 passningar, xT 0.37MetcalfeVidar Ari Jonsson: 97 passningar, xT -0.07JonssonAnders Trondsen: 87 passningar, xT 0.23TrondsenMarkus Johnsgard: 79 passningar, xT 0.23JohnsgardAleksander Andresen: 78 passningar, xT 0.26AndresenMartin Gjone: 75 passningar, xT 0.14Gjone

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceStartHamarkameratene
    Points1623
    xPoints2624.4
    xG per match1.41.3
    xGA per match1.91.9
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.310.19
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.320.33
    Playing styleStartHamarkameratene
    Build-up efficiency0.340.37
    Field tilt0.310.33
    xT per match10.89
    xTA per match1.41.4
    Won balls, offensive half3023
    Pressing intensity0.250.25
    Pressing efficiency0.270.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.290.23
    Entries into the box per match1311
    Entries into the box against1718
    Pass completion %0.690.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.72
    Passes per match288359
    Passes against per match427440
    Switches of play per match2326.7
    Long balls per match3536
    Set piecesStartHamarkameratene
    xG from free kicks0.10.05
    Corners per match4.34.1
    Corners against per match5.45.5
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.480.38
    First touch, defensive corners %0.520.55
    OtherStartHamarkameratene
    Throw-in control0.680.71
    The goalkeepersJacob Pryts (Start)Marcus Sandberg (Hamarkameratene)
    Saves4178
    Save %53%66%
    xG prevented34%44%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Start vs Hamarkameratene according to our model?

    The model gives Start a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Start 47%, draw 28%, Hamarkameratene 25%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.