01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Radnik Surdulica to win49%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Serbian Super League19°0,1 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Seven consecutive losses for Zemun set the stage for their clash against Radnik Surdulica, a team clearly in a better groove with 12 points thus far. The hosts’ repeated defeats underscore a deeper issue, reflected in their defensive lapses. Their xGA of 2.4 per match signals a vulnerability that a possession-based Surdulica, pressing high, is well-equipped to exploit.
Zemun’s direct style hasn't paid dividends, managing only 0.65 xG per match. In contrast, the visitors have been more productive, averaging 1.1 xG per match. This attacking edge, combined with Zemun’s porous defense, tilts the scales towards Surdulica. Despite the model's modest 49% win probability for the visitors, their tactical approach and recent form suggest they could get the job done.
While the model shows a 53% chance for over 2.5 goals, the real play is to back Surdulica. With odds at 2.10 on Bet365 for an away win, there’s value here worth considering. Most likely, this matchup leans towards a 1-2 victory for the visitors, aligning with both the expected goals and current form. This choice might not dazzle, but much like a well-placed defensive block, it could be just what pays the bills.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Zemun | X | 2 · Radnik Surdulica |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 3.20 | 3.40 | EV+ 3% 2.10 |
| Betfair Exchange | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.07 |
| Pinnacle | 3.27 | 3.07 | EV+ 5% 2.15 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 05:03
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Zemun | Radnik Surdulica |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 12 |
| xPoints | 5.3 | 11.1 |
| xG per match | 0.65 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.34 | 0.35 |
| Playing style | Zemun | Radnik Surdulica |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.28 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| xTA per match | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.16 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 19 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 230 | 262 |
| Passes against per match | 459 | 352 |
| Switches of play per match | 14.1 | 14.9 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Zemun | Radnik Surdulica |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 3.4 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.3 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.55 |
| Other | Zemun | Radnik Surdulica |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.63 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Mladen Živković (Zemun) | Stefan Ranđelović (Radnik Surdulica) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 45 | 26 |
| Save % | 74% | 74% |
| xG prevented | 63% | 36% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Radnik Surdulica a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Zemun 29%, draw 22%, Radnik Surdulica 49%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.