01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Hammarby TFF to win56%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Swedish Ettan
Läs på svenska
ArlandaCounter-attacks & crossesErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
With Hammarby TFF's possession-driven style meeting Arlanda's counter-attacking approach, the visitors look set to control the game. The model reveals a 56% win probability for Hammarby TFF, indicating their superior form and tactics. Arlanda's strategy of relying on crosses might be stifled by Hammarby TFF's high press, leaving the hosts with limited opportunities to exploit.
The expected goals further underline this dynamic: Hammarby TFF are projected at 1.89 against Arlanda's 1.20. Defensive solidity tilts in favor of the visitors, who boast a xGA of just 0.84 per match, significantly better than Arlanda's 1.4. The most likely scorelines, edging towards a narrow 1-1 draw or a 1-2 away win, reflect this analysis. Although Arlanda could snag a goal through their counter-attacking prowess, Hammarby TFF's organized defense should limit overall damage.
Though the head-to-head record only consists of one game, a Hammarby TFF win, it does lend slight support to the current form and expectation. The visitors also edge out in both actual and expected points, further asserting their slight dominance in the league so far.
The over 2.5 goals market stands at 60%, but with Hammarby TFF's disciplined back line, a lower-scoring affair feels plausible despite the stats. Yet, with both teams to score also at 60%, a conservative play on both teams finding the net holds merit.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Arlanda | X | 2 · Hammarby TFF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.55 | 3.65 | EV+ 2% 1.82 |
| Betsson | 3.55 | 3.65 | EV+ 2% 1.82 |
| Nordicbet | 3.55 | 3.65 | EV+ 2% 1.82 |
Odds updated 16 Sept, 09:37
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Arlanda | Hammarby TFF |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 36 | 41 |
| xPoints | 29.4 | 32.2 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 0.84 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Arlanda | Hammarby TFF |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.4 |
| Field tilt | 0.41 | 0.78 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 0.73 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.5 | 0.57 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 22 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 8 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.85 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.82 |
| Passes per match | 263 | 487 |
| Passes against per match | 337 | 285 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.1 | 12.6 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Arlanda | Hammarby TFF |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Corners per match | 3.5 | 5.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 3.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.66 |
| Other | Arlanda | Hammarby TFF |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.42 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Adam Smedberg Lagh (Arlanda) | Elton Fischerström Opancar (Hammarby TFF) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 74 | 46 |
| Save % | 76% | 74% |
| xG prevented | 58% | 49% |
| Claims | 103 (95%) | 81 (94%) |
The model gives Hammarby TFF a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Arlanda 22%, draw 23%, Hammarby TFF 56%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.