01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Olympic or draw (1X)66%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
Swedish Ettan16°2,9 mm31 km/h
Läs på svenska
RosengårdPossession & high pressMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
TEXT: Since 2023, Olympic has faced Rosengård just once, with Olympic losing that meeting. However, with such a small sample size, this result shouldn't overshadow current form and the underlying numbers. Olympic's tendency to control possession and apply a high press mirrors Rosengård's style. This could lead to an intriguing tactical battle where both sides are keen to dominate the ball and press aggressively, potentially causing turnovers and transition opportunities.
Olympic's recent form sees them slightly underperforming their expected points, while Rosengård has been on a more stable trajectory. Rosengård holds a solid edge in traditional points, sitting at 34 compared to Olympic's 26, but the hosts boast a higher xG per match, hinting at a potential to surprise. Both teams have shown an ability to convert chances, and given the expected goals tally—1.74 for Olympic against 1.56 for Rosengård—a tight contest is likely.
The model suggests a slight preference for Olympic, with a 42% win probability. However, the most likely scorelines reflect a close affair, with 1-1 at 10% and 2-1 at 9%. The expectation for goals is strong, with a 64% chance for over 2.5 goals and a 65% probability for both teams to score. The predicted wet conditions may suppress goal-scoring slightly, but it's factored into the model's numbers, so the inclination towards goals remains.
From a betting perspective, there's clear value in backing Olympic at odds of 3.05 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. Given the model's rating of their chances at 42%, these odds present a 28% edge. While not a guarantee, this represents a solid betting angle for those looking to capitalize on potentially undervalued probabilities.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Olympic | X | 2 · Rosengård |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 28% 3.05 | 3.60 | 2.00 |
| Betsson | EV+ 28% 3.05 | 3.60 | 2.00 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 28% 3.05 | 3.60 | 2.00 |
Odds updated 15 Sept, 11:37
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Olympic | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 26 | 34 |
| xPoints | 28.8 | 33.9 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.38 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Olympic | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.39 |
| Field tilt | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.83 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 408 | 381 |
| Passes against per match | 342 | 358 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.7 | 16.6 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Olympic | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.17 | 0.2 |
| Corners per match | 5.5 | 5.9 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 3.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| Other | Olympic | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.65 | 0.54 |
| The goalkeepers | Joakim Persson (Olympic) | Alexander Cederfelt (Rosengård) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 56 | 56 |
| Save % | 58% | 71% |
| xG prevented | 40% | 70% |
| Claims | 93 (94%) | 105 (91%) |
The model gives Olympic a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Olympic 42%, draw 22%, Rosengård 36%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 64% and under at 36%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.