01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Umeå FC or draw (X2)64%
- Over 1.5 goals89%
Swedish Ettan14°0,1 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The matchup between IFK Stocksund and Umeå FC underscores a potential goal-fest, with a 71% probability for over 2.5 goals. The expected goals are tightly matched — 1.78 for Stocksund and 1.92 for Umeå — highlighting a balanced yet slightly visitor-favored contest. Historically, Umeå has edged these encounters, but the sample size of five games is small and shouldn't overshadow the current form.
Umeå FC's style of possession control could dictate the pace, while the physicality of the hosts might counterbalance with defensive grit. Despite Umeå holding a 43% model probability to win, the odds are teetering, with the most likely scorelines being quite close. The statistics reflect a subtle lean towards a narrow Umeå victory, perhaps a 1-2 scoreline, but the 1-1 draw remains on the cards at 9%.
Given the model's indication, there’s a slight edge in backing the home side at odds of 2.72 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. The model's 38% win rate for Stocksund translates into a 3% edge, making this the sharpest angle in a tightly poised contest.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · IFK Stocksund | X | 2 · Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 3% 2.72 | 3.80 | 2.12 |
| Betsson | EV+ 3% 2.72 | 3.80 | 2.12 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 3% 2.72 | 3.80 | 2.12 |
Odds updated 15 Sept, 13:37
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | IFK Stocksund | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 14 | 23 |
| xPoints | 21.8 | 30.5 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | IFK Stocksund | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.51 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.52 | 0.43 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 376 | 324 |
| Passes against per match | 339 | 356 |
| Switches of play per match | 12.8 | 17.1 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 30 |
| Set pieces | IFK Stocksund | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.22 | 0.15 |
| Corners per match | 3.8 | 5.9 |
| Corners against per match | 4.6 | 5.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.25 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.51 |
| Other | IFK Stocksund | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.57 | 0.54 |
| The goalkeepers | Jakob Rhawi (IFK Stocksund) | Pontus Eriksson (Umeå FC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 72 | 50 |
| Save % | 61% | 68% |
| xG prevented | 37% | 48% |
| Claims | 101 (86%) | 60 (92%) |
The model gives Umeå FC a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: IFK Stocksund 38%, draw 20%, Umeå FC 43%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 71% and under at 29%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 71% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.