01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Laholm or draw (1X)72%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Swedish Ettan14°8,6 mm29 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The numbers suggest a competitive clash between Lehoma and the visitors from Kristianstad, with a slight edge for the home side. Despite the small sample of their head-to-head record—just one match, which swung in favor of Laholm—the real story lies in their expected goals and current form. Laholm's possession-oriented style promises to control the game's rhythm, while Kristianstad's counter-attacking strategy will seek quick breaks, influenced by their lower xG within 8 seconds of gaining possession.
The expected goals tell a compelling story: Laholm at 1.80 against Kristianstad's 1.34 indicates a higher attacking potential for the home team. A soft xPoints edge to Laholm (27.0 vs. 26.8) further hints at their slight superiority, even if Kristianstad boasts marginally better defensive numbers. The most probable scorelines underline this: the model favors a 1-1 draw but is also open to a 2-1 home win, with Laholm's superior xG numbers lending credence to the latter.
Rainy conditions, with 11.7 mm expected, could dampen offensive ambitions, but the numbers still lean towards an over 2.5 goals outcome at 61%. Goals from both sides are also backed by a 62% chance, signaling that neither defense is impenetrable.
For those seeking value, Laholm stands out given their 42% win probability. The model's lean, coupled with their possession play at home, makes Laholm an appealing pick.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Laholm | X | 2 · Kristianstad FC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.32 | 3.40 | 2.62 |
| Betsson | 2.32 | 3.40 | 2.62 |
| Nordicbet | 2.32 | 3.40 | 2.62 |
Odds updated 15 Sept, 11:37
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Laholm | Kristianstad FC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 21 | 21 |
| xPoints | 27 | 26.8 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 0.97 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.44 | 0.24 |
| Playing style | Laholm | Kristianstad FC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.42 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.46 | 0.54 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 350 | 330 |
| Passes against per match | 380 | 416 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.6 | 20.3 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 39 |
| Set pieces | Laholm | Kristianstad FC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.1 | 0.16 |
| Corners per match | 4 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.63 |
| Other | Laholm | Kristianstad FC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.53 | 0.55 |
| The goalkeepers | Max Johnsson (Laholm) | Otto Larsson Wågert (Kristianstad FC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 56 | 69 |
| Save % | 60% | 68% |
| xG prevented | 37% | 45% |
| Claims | 151 (93%) | 150 (96%) |
The model gives Laholm a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Laholm 42%, draw 26%, Kristianstad FC 32%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.