Basel vs Grasshopper Prediction: Home win 50% (25 Oct 2026)

Swiss Super League25 October 2026 16:30 CETSt. Jakob-Park, Basel12°6,6 mm23 km/h

Läs på svenska

BaselPossession control

GrasshopperCounter-attacks & crosses

The model's lean: 1 · Basel (50%)Best value by the model: Under 0,5 @ 26.00 (+46 %)

1 · Basel 50%X 26%24% Grasshopper · 2

50%

26%

24%

Prediction summary

BetBuilders AI model prediction for Basel vs Grasshopper (Swiss Super League, Sunday, 25 October 2026): Basel win 50%, draw 26%, Grasshopper win 24%. Expected goals (xG): Basel 1.84, Grasshopper 1.10. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 56%, both teams to score 56%. Double chance: Basel or draw 76%, Grasshopper or draw 50%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.

Bet on this match

NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet

BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

Analysis: Basel – Grasshopper

Erik Lindberg · 23 October 2026 · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

TEXT: Basel's possession-based style against Grasshopper's counter-attacking approach sets up a compelling tactical clash. With the hosts favored at 50% probability to win, their ability to control the game will likely dictate the match's tempo. Historically, Basel has dominated this fixture, boasting four victories in their last six meetings since 2023. However, Grasshopper arrives on a three-match losing streak, which could weigh heavily on their confidence.

Despite Basel's historical edge, a deeper dive into the metrics reveals interesting contrasts. Grasshopper's xG per match stands at 1.6, noticeably higher than Basel's 1.1, yet they struggle defensively with an xGA of 2.0 compared to Basel's 1.6. This suggests that while the visitors can create chances, their defensive frailty might be their undoing. Basel's expected goals of 1.84 indicates they should find the net, but Grasshopper's counter-attacking strengths mean they remain a threat.

Weather conditions, with 9.9 mm of rain expected, are likely to suppress goal-scoring opportunities. This has already been integrated into the model's numbers, nudging the probabilities toward a more cautious expectation. While the model leans towards a Basel win, the most likely scoreline is 1-1, with 2-1 or 1-0 to Basel also among the top possibilities.

Given the circumstances, the under 2.5 goals market presents significant value. Odds of 3.0 with bookmakers like Betsafe, LeoVegas, and Nordicbet offer a 31% edge over the model's 44% probability. This line aligns with a potentially tight affair, where the rain could dampen offensive output and defensive caution becomes paramount. For those seeking a pragmatic play, this is the spot to consider.

Basel

Form LLWLL

League ranking xG #11xGA #6xT #11xP/match #10Points #7

Key players

Flavius David DaniliucCBxG 0.06 · xT 0.07
Keigo TsunemotoRBxG 0.01 · xT 0.16
Xherdan ShaqiriCAMxG 0.14 · xT 0.18

Grasshopper

Form DWLLL

League ranking xG #7xGA #10xT #6xP/match #8Points #11

Key players

Tim MeyerCDMxG 0.00 · xT 0.10
Samuel Sebastian KrasniqiLWxG 0.33 · xT 0.34
Young Joon LeeFxG 0.52 · xT -0.01

Match prediction: Basel – Grasshopper

Predicted score matrix

Grasshopper →

Basel →

0–05.6%

0–15.5%

0–23.2%

0–31.2%

0–4+0.4%

1–09.4%

1–111.0%

1–25.9%

1–32.2%

1–4+0.8%

2–09.0%

2–19.8%

2–25.4%

2–32.0%

2–4+0.7%

3–05.5%

3–16.0%

3–23.3%

3–31.2%

3–4+0.4%

4+–03.8%

4+–14.2%

4+–22.3%

4+–30.8%

4+–4+0.3%

Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

Most likely scorelines

1.1-111%
2.2-110%
3.1-09%
4.2-09%
5.3-16%

Expected goals

1,84–1,10

Both teams to score

56%

Over/under goals

Expected goals: 2,9

115%

223%

322%

416%

5+17%

Under 2,544%

@3.10EV+35%

Over 2,556%

@1.42

Ready-made bet suggestions

More combos & build your own →

01 · 2 legs

Safe

Basel to win50%
Over 1.5 goals79%

02 · 3 legs

Balanced

Basel to win50%
Over 2.5 goals56%
Albian Afrim Ajeti to score31%

03 · 4 legs

Bold

Both teams to score56%
Over 2.5 goals56%
Albian Afrim Ajeti to score31%
Manex Gibelalde Mújika to be booked23%

Odds & value

The model's value spots

Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

Under 0.56% probability@26.00Bet365EV+46%reference odds
Under 1.521% probability@7.00Bet365EV+44%reference odds
Under 2.544% probability@3.10Bet365EV+35%reference odds

Bookmaker	1 · Basel	X	2 · Grasshopper
Bet365	1.56	EV+ 14% 4.40	EV+ 3% 4.33
Betsafe	1.65	EV+ 5% 4.05	4.10
LeoVegas	1.68	EV+ 6% 4.10	4.10
Nordicbet	1.65	EV+ 5% 4.05	4.10
Pinnacle	1.65	EV+ 19% 4.58	EV+ 10% 4.63

Odds updated 25 Oct, 10:35

Odds movement

10 %

61 %56 %

1.65 → 1.65

X+1 %

23 %18 %

4.53 → 4.58

2+8 %

24 %19 %

4.30 → 4.63

Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 23/10/2026 → 25/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

Statistics

Head-to-head

6 matches

Basel 4Draw 1Grasshopper 1

Goals: 9–4 (⌀ 2,2)

Head-to-head based on Swiss Super League data since 2023.

Key facts

Basel dominate this fixture historically: 4 wins to 1 in 6 meetings.
Grasshopper have lost 3 in a row.

xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

Basel

Grasshopper

When goals are scored and conceded — 2026

Basel (17–20)

Grasshopper (13–26)

Pass networks

Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

Basel

Grasshopper

xT networks

The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

Basel

Grasshopper

The teams in numbers

Performance	Basel	Grasshopper
Points	13	8
xPoints	11	13.1
xG per match	1.1	1.6
xGA per match	1.6	2
xG within 8s of winning the ball	0.22	0.38
xGA within 8s of losing the ball	0.23	0.32

Playing style	Basel	Grasshopper
Build-up efficiency	0.32	0.28
Field tilt	0.46	0.48
xT per match	0.83	1.1
xTA per match	1.2	1.5
Won balls, offensive half	22	30
Pressing intensity	0.24	0.24
Pressing efficiency	0.28	0.31
Pressing efficiency, offensive half	0.24	0.28
Entries into the box per match	13	14
Entries into the box against	17	17
Pass completion %	0.77	0.68
Pass completion % under pressure	0.71	0.62
Passes per match	366	273
Passes against per match	350	366
Switches of play per match	31.8	15.1
Long balls per match	34	29

Set pieces	Basel	Grasshopper
xG from free kicks	0.04	0.17
Corners per match	4	5.1
Corners against per match	6	6.3
xG per corner	0.03	0.07
xGA per corner against	0.02	0.03
First touch, offensive corners %	0.6	0.45
First touch, defensive corners %	0.46	0.57

Other	Basel	Grasshopper
Throw-in control	0.67	0.63

The goalkeepers	Mirko Salvi (Basel)	Marvin Hübel (Grasshopper)
Saves	25	21
Save %	61%	60%
xG prevented	38%	41%
Claims	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

Teams & more matches this round

Basel

Fixtures, form & tips

Grasshopper

Fixtures, form & tips

Frequently asked questions

Who wins Basel vs Grasshopper according to our model?

The model gives Basel a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Basel 50%, draw 26%, Grasshopper 24%.

What is the most likely scoreline?

The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

Over or under 2.5 goals?

The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.

Will both teams score?

The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.

How many goals are expected in Basel vs Grasshopper?

The model expects 1.84 goals (xG) for Basel and 1.10 for Grasshopper, 2.94 in total.

What does the model say about double chance?

Basel or draw (1X) 76%, Grasshopper or draw (X2) 50% and no draw (12) 74%.

Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.