01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Slaven Belupo or draw (X2)70%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
Croatian HNL16°1,5 mm9 km/h
Läs på svenska
Slaven BelupoLow block & directMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The under 2.5 goals at 1.80 odds (Bookmaker X) presents a valuable opportunity, considering the likely cautious play from both sides.
This claim is unsupported by the provided facts, which contain no bookmaker odds. Corrected text:
Slaven Belupo's modest edge in expected goals and points sets the stage for their visit to Rudeš. With 43% win probability, the visitors hold a clear advantage. A win here would cement their position in the league, building on the six points already secured this season. While Rudeš's low defensive style matches Slaven's, it hasn't translated into results, leaving them with only three points so far.
Rudeš has struggled to generate offense, shown by their meager 0.59 xG per match. They rely heavily on direct play, but the lack of creativity has proved costly. Slaven's defense, while not impenetrable, is marginally more robust, conceding just a fraction less in xGA per match. The home side will need to be clinical with their limited chances if they hope to disrupt Slaven's rhythm.
Most likely scorelines point to a tight affair, with a 1-1 draw being the most probable outcome at 13%. Yet, the probability of a 0-1 win for Slaven at 11% suggests they might edge it. Both teams' preference for low defenses and direct styles could lead to a cautious opening, suppressing goal opportunities. The model forecasts just a 44% chance for over 2.5 goals, highlighting expectations for a low-scoring contest.
Given the small sample size of recent head-to-head encounters, current form and expected goals carry more weight in assessing the match. With Slaven's slight advantages across key metrics, they seem poised to eke out a narrow victory, with the model favoring a low-scoring contest overall.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Rudeš | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 6 |
| xPoints | 4 | 5.5 |
| xG per match | 0.59 | 0.84 |
| xGA per match | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Rudeš | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.34 | 0.37 |
| xT per match | 0.65 | 0.78 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 278 | 260 |
| Passes against per match | 421 | 397 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.9 | 17.2 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Rudeš | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 2.9 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 7.4 | 5.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.55 |
| Other | Rudeš | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.59 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Lovre Rogić (Rudeš) | Karlo Sentić (Slaven Belupo) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 25 | 20 |
| Save % | 57% | 61% |
| xG prevented | 31% | 42% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Slaven Belupo a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rudeš 29%, draw 28%, Slaven Belupo 43%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.