01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Southampton to win61%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
EFL ChampionshipSt Mary's Stadium, Southampton11°18 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Southampton vs Queens Park Rangers (EFL Championship, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Southampton win 61%, draw 21%, Queens Park Rangers win 18%. Expected goals (xG): Southampton 1.85, Queens Park Rangers 1.13. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 57%, both teams to score 57%. Double chance: Southampton or draw 82%, Queens Park Rangers or draw 39%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT: Southampton's possession-based strategy squares off against Queens Park Rangers' aggressive pressing game, setting the stage for a tactical clash shaped by contrasting styles. The hosts show a marked home advantage, winning 59% of their matches on their own turf, a statistic that aligns with the model's 61% probability of a Southampton victory. Despite this, the most likely individual scoreline is a tight 1-1 draw at 11%, with a Southampton win at 2-1 following closely behind at 10%.
The metrics reveal a nuanced picture. Southampton's expected goals per match (1.85) suggest they will likely create more high-quality chances than QPR, who sit at 1.13. However, the visitors are not without merit; their slightly better defensive figures indicate a resilience that could stifle the hosts' attacking intentions. This defensive prowess is particularly relevant given the forecasted rain, which often dampens offensive momentum, suggesting a potential struggle to convert chances into goals.
Both teams show a high likelihood of scoring, with a 57% chance that both find the net. The over 2.5 goals market also leans towards the affirmative at 57%, but the anticipated conditions might suppress an outright goal fest. The small head-to-head sample since 2023, where Southampton secured two wins, hints at precedence but is less critical than current form indicators.
Given the close expected goals numbers and the rain factor, a stalemate remains a tangible outcome. As the tension builds, keep a keen eye on how Southampton's control interacts with QPR's press, a dynamic that could tip the scales in a tight contest.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Southampton | X | 2 · Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|---|
| LeoVegas | 1.61 | 4.20 | 4.50 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 18:38
1.58 → 1.61
4.33 → 4.20
4.60 → 4.50
1.50 → 1.55
LeoVegas · 2 recorded price levels · 24/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Southampton | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 21 | 17 |
| xPoints | 17 | 17.7 |
| xG per match | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.17 |
| Playing style | Southampton | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.59 | 0.51 |
| xT per match | 0.94 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.98 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 20 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 444 | 368 |
| Passes against per match | 298 | 398 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.5 | 27.1 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Southampton | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 5 | 5.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.2 | 3.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.42 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.74 |
| Other | Southampton | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Daniel Peretz (Southampton) | Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 31 | 31 |
| Save % | 80% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 51% | 65% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Southampton a 61% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Southampton 61%, draw 21%, Queens Park Rangers 18%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The model expects 1.85 goals (xG) for Southampton and 1.13 for Queens Park Rangers, 2.98 in total.
Southampton or draw (1X) 82%, Queens Park Rangers or draw (X2) 39% and no draw (12) 79%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.