EFL League OneAbbey Stadium, Cambridge15°0,8 mm14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Cambridge UnitedCambridge UnitedLow block & direct
    vs
    WimbledonWimbledonLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Cambridge United (45%)Best value by the model: 2 · Wimbledon @ 4.41 (+24 %)

    Cambridge United vs Wimbledon · EFL League One

    1 · Cambridge United 45%X 27%28% Wimbledon · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Cambridge UnitedWimbledon

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The numbers suggest a low-scoring affair, with under 2.5 goals at 55% and a 49% chance for both teams to find the net. Most likely outcomes are tightly contested: a 1-1 draw at 13% and a 1-0 win for Cambridge at 12%. Given the low defensive profiles of both sides, the match could hinge on which team capitalizes on mistakes, but Cambridge’s scoring streak lends them a slight edge.

    Cambridge United have scored in 11 consecutive league matches, a streak that highlights their offensive consistency. The model gives the hosts a 45% chance of victory, leaning towards a Cambridge win. Although both teams share a similar expected goals per match at 1.1, Cambridge's current form and slight edges in points and xPoints tip the scales in their favor.

    Their consistent goal-scoring and slight edges in points and xPoints—12 to 11 and 9.5 to 8.4, respectively—suggest they are the more reliable side. As Cambridge United aim to extend their scoring run, a 1-0 victory looks the most pragmatic call, aligning with both the model and form.

    Cambridge UnitedCambridge United
    Form LWDWD
    League ranking xG #17xGA #17xT #20xP/match #15Points #5
    Key players
    • Sulaiman Borbor KaikaiLWxG 0.13 · xT 0.16
    • Benjamin Leo KnightRWxG 0.25 · xT 0.07
    • Mamadou Ousmane JobeCBxG 0.18 · xT 0.22
    WimbledonWimbledon
    Form WLWWD
    League ranking xG #19xGA #13xT #12xP/match #18Points #7
    Key players
    • Jayden Connor StockleyFxG 0.31 · xT 0.02
    • Steven Jeffrey SeddonLWxG 0.11 · xT 0.13
    • Ryan Anthony JohnsonCBxG 0.06 · xT 0.08

    Match prediction: Cambridge UnitedWimbledon

    Predicted score matrix

    Wimbledon
    Cambridge United
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.9%
    0–18.1%
    0–24.2%
    0–31.4%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–012.2%
    1–112.8%
    1–26.1%
    1–32.0%
    1–4+0.6%
    2
    2–09.2%
    2–19.1%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–04.5%
    3–14.5%
    3–22.2%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–02.3%
    4+–12.3%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.2-09%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-09%
    Expected goals
    1,470,99
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,555%
    @1.83EV+1%
    Over 2,545%
    @1.98

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Cambridge United to win45%
    • Under 3.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    35%

    Fair odds

    2.85

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Cambridge United to win45%
    • Under 2.5 goals55%
    • Zak Dominic Bradshaw to score21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals45%
    • Zak Dominic Bradshaw to score21%
    • Isaac Ifeoluwa Foloronso Olushore Ogundere to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Wimbledon28% probability@4.41PinnacleEV+24%reference odds
    • 2 · Wimbledon28% probability@4.25BetsafeEV+19%reference odds
    • 2 · Wimbledon28% probability@4.25BetssonEV+19%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Cambridge UnitedX2 · Wimbledon
    Betsafe1.803.40
    EV+ 19%
    4.25
    Betsson1.803.40
    EV+ 19%
    4.25
    Nordicbet1.803.40
    EV+ 19%
    4.25
    Pinnacle1.793.61
    EV+ 24%
    4.41

    Odds updated 22 Sept, 19:35

    Odds movement

    1-4 %
    54 %49 %

    1.871.79

    X+3 %
    29 %24 %

    3.523.61

    2+7 %
    24 %19 %

    4.124.41

    Over 2,50 %
    50 %45 %

    1.991.98

    Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 20/09/2026 → 21/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Cambridge United have scored in 11 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Cambridge United
    Wimbledon
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Cambridge United (1210)
    Wimbledon (57)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Cambridge United
    Callum Perry: 132 passningar, xT 0.33PerryDominic Martin Ball: 129 passningar, xT 0.08BallKelland John William James Watts: 112 passningar, xT 0.33WattsCathal Séan Heffernan Andrews: 96 passningar, xT 0.37AndrewsLiam Dennis Bennett: 85 passningar, xT 0.18BennettOwen Moxon: 78 passningar, xT 0.29MoxonBenjamin Leo Knight: 75 passningar, xT -0.14KnightZak Dominic Bradshaw: 73 passningar, xT 0.91BradshawJake Eastwood: 69 passningar, xT 0.32EastwoodSulaiman Borbor Kaikai: 67 passningar, xT 0.4KaikaiPelly Ruddock Mpanzu: 58 passningar, xT 0.21Mpanzu
    Wimbledon
    Alistair Oluwashaun Smith: 136 passningar, xT 0.12SmithRyan Anthony Johnson: 122 passningar, xT 0.53JohnsonSteven Jeffrey Seddon: 121 passningar, xT 0.65SeddonMyles Elliot Zach Hippolyte: 100 passningar, xT 0.63HippolyteDaniel Liam Sweeney: 98 passningar, xT 0.12SweeneyIsaac Ifeoluwa Foloronso Olushore Ogundere: 78 passningar, xT 0.2OgundereZeze Steven Sessegnon: 71 passningar, xT 0.3SessegnonOllie Harrison: 69 passningar, xT 0.42HarrisonZack Nelson: 56 passningar, xT 0.08NelsonJosef John Bursik: 54 passningar, xT 0.2BursikAndrew Kyere Yiadom: 52 passningar, xT 0.13Yiadom
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Cambridge United
    Callum Perry: 132 passningar, xT 0.33PerryDominic Martin Ball: 129 passningar, xT 0.08BallKelland John William James Watts: 112 passningar, xT 0.33WattsCathal Séan Heffernan Andrews: 96 passningar, xT 0.37AndrewsLiam Dennis Bennett: 85 passningar, xT 0.18BennettOwen Moxon: 78 passningar, xT 0.29MoxonBenjamin Leo Knight: 75 passningar, xT -0.14KnightZak Dominic Bradshaw: 73 passningar, xT 0.91BradshawJake Eastwood: 69 passningar, xT 0.32EastwoodSulaiman Borbor Kaikai: 67 passningar, xT 0.4KaikaiPelly Ruddock Mpanzu: 58 passningar, xT 0.21Mpanzu
    Wimbledon
    Alistair Oluwashaun Smith: 136 passningar, xT 0.12SmithRyan Anthony Johnson: 122 passningar, xT 0.53JohnsonSteven Jeffrey Seddon: 121 passningar, xT 0.65SeddonMyles Elliot Zach Hippolyte: 100 passningar, xT 0.63HippolyteDaniel Liam Sweeney: 98 passningar, xT 0.12SweeneyIsaac Ifeoluwa Foloronso Olushore Ogundere: 78 passningar, xT 0.2OgundereZeze Steven Sessegnon: 71 passningar, xT 0.3SessegnonOllie Harrison: 69 passningar, xT 0.42HarrisonZack Nelson: 56 passningar, xT 0.08NelsonJosef John Bursik: 54 passningar, xT 0.2BursikAndrew Kyere Yiadom: 52 passningar, xT 0.13Yiadom

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCambridge UnitedWimbledon
    Points1211
    xPoints9.58.4
    xG per match1.11.1
    xGA per match1.51.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.230.22
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.350.2
    Playing styleCambridge UnitedWimbledon
    Build-up efficiency0.360.34
    Field tilt0.450.53
    xT per match0.740.95
    xTA per match1.11
    Won balls, offensive half2828
    Pressing intensity0.250.24
    Pressing efficiency0.340.34
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.3
    Entries into the box per match1213
    Entries into the box against1312
    Pass completion %0.610.66
    Pass completion % under pressure0.630.63
    Passes per match233252
    Passes against per match342303
    Switches of play per match16.113.3
    Long balls per match2826
    Set piecesCambridge UnitedWimbledon
    xG from free kicks0.080.07
    Corners per match65.6
    Corners against per match4.65.7
    xG per corner0.010.04
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.360.33
    First touch, defensive corners %0.720.7
    OtherCambridge UnitedWimbledon
    Throw-in control0.660.71
    The goalkeepersJake Eastwood (Cambridge United)Josef John Bursik (Wimbledon)
    Saves1913
    Save %66%100%
    xG prevented44%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Cambridge United vs Wimbledon according to our model?

    The model gives Cambridge United a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambridge United 45%, draw 27%, Wimbledon 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.