01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Cambridge United to win45%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL League OneAbbey Stadium, Cambridge15°0,8 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The numbers suggest a low-scoring affair, with under 2.5 goals at 55% and a 49% chance for both teams to find the net. Most likely outcomes are tightly contested: a 1-1 draw at 13% and a 1-0 win for Cambridge at 12%. Given the low defensive profiles of both sides, the match could hinge on which team capitalizes on mistakes, but Cambridge’s scoring streak lends them a slight edge.
Cambridge United have scored in 11 consecutive league matches, a streak that highlights their offensive consistency. The model gives the hosts a 45% chance of victory, leaning towards a Cambridge win. Although both teams share a similar expected goals per match at 1.1, Cambridge's current form and slight edges in points and xPoints tip the scales in their favor.
Their consistent goal-scoring and slight edges in points and xPoints—12 to 11 and 9.5 to 8.4, respectively—suggest they are the more reliable side. As Cambridge United aim to extend their scoring run, a 1-0 victory looks the most pragmatic call, aligning with both the model and form.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cambridge United | X | 2 · Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.80 | 3.40 | EV+ 19% 4.25 |
| Betsson | 1.80 | 3.40 | EV+ 19% 4.25 |
| Nordicbet | 1.80 | 3.40 | EV+ 19% 4.25 |
| Pinnacle | 1.79 | 3.61 | EV+ 24% 4.41 |
Odds updated 22 Sept, 19:35
1.87 → 1.79
3.52 → 3.61
4.12 → 4.41
1.99 → 1.98
Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 20/09/2026 → 21/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cambridge United | Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 11 |
| xPoints | 9.5 | 8.4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Cambridge United | Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.45 | 0.53 |
| xT per match | 0.74 | 0.95 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.61 | 0.66 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 233 | 252 |
| Passes against per match | 342 | 303 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.1 | 13.3 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Cambridge United | Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 6 | 5.6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.6 | 5.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.72 | 0.7 |
| Other | Cambridge United | Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.66 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Jake Eastwood (Cambridge United) | Josef John Bursik (Wimbledon) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 19 | 13 |
| Save % | 66% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 44% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Cambridge United a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambridge United 45%, draw 27%, Wimbledon 28%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.