EFL League OneKing Power Stadium, Leicester15°18 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Leicester CityLeicester CityPossession control
    vs
    Wigan AthleticWigan AthleticPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Leicester City (52%)

    Leicester City vs Wigan Athletic · EFL League One

    1 · Leicester City 52%X 23%25% Wigan Athletic · 2

    Bet on this match

    BetssonFå ett 250 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4!Claim the bonus at Betsson
    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Leicester CityWigan Athletic

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    TEXT: A clash of possession styles often promises tactical intrigue, but Leicester City's matchup with Wigan Athletic tomorrow edges towards a specific narrative: can the Foxes convert their territorial dominance into three points against a side that, on paper, looks sharper in the attack?

    With 52% probability, the model favors Leicester City to use their possession-based approach effectively. The Foxes might control the ball more, but Wigan's 1.5 xG per match outstrips Leicester's 1.4, indicating the visitors' potential to create quality chances. Yet, defensive frailties haunt Wigan, conceding 1.8 xGA per match, which could be the crack Leicester exploits. It’s a balancing act between Leicester's control and Wigan's opportunism.

    Despite Leicester's apparent edge in the standings with nine points to Wigan's four, the underlying metrics paint a tighter contest. Wigan's xPoints of 8.3 suggests they've been rather unfortunate compared to Leicester's 6.9. This misfortune might just be the impetus Wigan needs to disrupt the expected narrative. Still, Leicester's ability to tighten defensively—allowing just 1.3 xGA per match—could prove pivotal in stifling Wigan's attacking intent.

    As we delve deeper, the most compelling betting angle emerges around the over/under goals market. The model indicates a 58% chance of over 2.5 goals, hinting at an open game despite stylistic similarities. Given both teams' inclinations toward possession and the potential for defensive lapses, this is the standout play in a matchup that's as much about fine margins as it is about possession football. Expect a tightly contested 2-1 victory for Leicester, where every chance and misstep will count.

    Leicester CityLeicester City
    Form DWLWD
    League ranking xG #11xGA #9xT #5xP/match #24Points #12
    Key players
    • John David LundstramCAMxG 0.09 · xT 0.06
    • Emil Riis JakobsenFxG 0.33 · xT 0.16
    • Memeh Caleb OkoliCBxG 0.01 · xT 0.06
    Wigan AthleticWigan Athletic
    Form LWLDL
    League ranking xG #7xGA #22xT #8xP/match #19Points #24
    Key players
    • Max Mcauley PowerCAMxG 0.04 · xT 0.12
    • Sonny Tufail PerkinsFxG 0.59 · xT -0.01
    • Jensen Guy WeirRWxG 0.07 · xT 0.12

    Match prediction: Leicester CityWigan Athletic

    Predicted score matrix

    Wigan Athletic
    Leicester City
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.1%
    0–15.6%
    0–23.6%
    0–31.4%
    0–4+0.6%
    1
    1–08.4%
    1–111.0%
    1–26.5%
    1–32.6%
    1–4+1.0%
    2
    2–07.9%
    2–19.7%
    2–25.9%
    2–32.4%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–04.8%
    3–15.8%
    3–23.6%
    3–31.4%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–03.3%
    4+–14.0%
    4+–22.4%
    4+–31.0%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-110%
    3. 3.1-08%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.1-26%
    Expected goals
    1,811,22
    Both teams to score
    59%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,0
    Under 2,542%
    Over 2,558%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Leicester City to win52%
    • Over 1.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    43%

    Fair odds

    2.35

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Leicester City to win52%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Oliver William Skipp to score28%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score59%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Oliver William Skipp to score28%
    • Morgan Alexander Fox to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Leicester City
    Wigan Athletic
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Leicester City (911)
    Wigan Athletic (512)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Leicester City
    Luke Jonathan Thomas: 382 passningar, xT 0.97ThomasHarry Souttar: 376 passningar, xT 0.64SouttarLouis Page: 273 passningar, xT 0.26PageJayden Joseph: 250 passningar, xT 0.11JosephChristian Hector McFarlane: 179 passningar, xT 0.21McFarlaneAlex Simon McCarthy: 167 passningar, xT 0.1McCarthySamuel Charles Braybrooke: 166 passningar, xT 0.47BraybrookeWarren Patrick O'Hora: 152 passningar, xT 0.09O'HoraJohn David Lundstram: 132 passningar, xT 0.12LundstramWout Felix Lina Faes: 107 passningar, xT 0.17FaesWilliam Thomas Alves: 86 passningar, xT 1.05Alves
    Wigan Athletic
    Max Mcauley Power: 228 passningar, xT 0.41PowerMorgan Alexander Fox: 192 passningar, xT 0.31FoxFinley Jack Burns: 187 passningar, xT 0.11BurnsJames Carragher: 181 passningar, xT 0.57CarragherJensen Guy Weir: 158 passningar, xT 0.46WeirCharlie George Gray: 115 passningar, xT 0.15GrayReggie Walsh: 113 passningar, xT 0.25WalshJoe Whitworth: 107 passningar, xT 0.09WhitworthJon Mellish: 99 passningar, xT 0.06MellishArchie Andrew Philip Harris: 97 passningar, xT 0.51HarrisFraser Murray: 44 passningar, xT 0.47Murray
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Leicester City
    Luke Jonathan Thomas: 382 passningar, xT 0.97ThomasHarry Souttar: 376 passningar, xT 0.64SouttarLouis Page: 273 passningar, xT 0.26PageJayden Joseph: 250 passningar, xT 0.11JosephChristian Hector McFarlane: 179 passningar, xT 0.21McFarlaneAlex Simon McCarthy: 167 passningar, xT 0.1McCarthySamuel Charles Braybrooke: 166 passningar, xT 0.47BraybrookeWarren Patrick O'Hora: 152 passningar, xT 0.09O'HoraJohn David Lundstram: 132 passningar, xT 0.12LundstramWout Felix Lina Faes: 107 passningar, xT 0.17FaesWilliam Thomas Alves: 86 passningar, xT 1.05Alves
    Wigan Athletic
    Max Mcauley Power: 228 passningar, xT 0.41PowerMorgan Alexander Fox: 192 passningar, xT 0.31FoxFinley Jack Burns: 187 passningar, xT 0.11BurnsJames Carragher: 181 passningar, xT 0.57CarragherJensen Guy Weir: 158 passningar, xT 0.46WeirCharlie George Gray: 115 passningar, xT 0.15GrayReggie Walsh: 113 passningar, xT 0.25WalshJoe Whitworth: 107 passningar, xT 0.09WhitworthJon Mellish: 99 passningar, xT 0.06MellishArchie Andrew Philip Harris: 97 passningar, xT 0.51HarrisFraser Murray: 44 passningar, xT 0.47Murray

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceLeicester CityWigan Athletic
    Points94
    xPoints6.98.3
    xG per match1.41.5
    xGA per match1.31.8
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.230.26
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.240.23
    Playing styleLeicester CityWigan Athletic
    Build-up efficiency0.290.31
    Field tilt0.650.59
    xT per match1.21.1
    xTA per match0.721.1
    Won balls, offensive half1820
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.350.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.26
    Entries into the box per match1512
    Entries into the box against1011
    Pass completion %0.820.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.7
    Passes per match540365
    Passes against per match222300
    Switches of play per match16.517.1
    Long balls per match2225
    Set piecesLeicester CityWigan Athletic
    xG from free kicks0.020.04
    Corners per match6.75.7
    Corners against per match5.35.5
    xG per corner0.030.03
    xGA per corner against0.040.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.380.42
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.62
    OtherLeicester CityWigan Athletic
    Throw-in control0.770.73
    The goalkeepersAlex Simon McCarthy (Leicester City)Joe Whitworth (Wigan Athletic)
    Saves1711
    Save %61%65%
    xG prevented43%53%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Leicester City vs Wigan Athletic according to our model?

    The model gives Leicester City a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Leicester City 52%, draw 23%, Wigan Athletic 25%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.