EFL League TwoBroadfield Stadium, Crawley11°20 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Crawley TownCrawley TownPossession control
    vs
    ChesterfieldChesterfieldPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Chesterfield (56%)Best value by the model: Under 3,5 @ 1.53 (+1 %)

    Crawley Town vs Chesterfield · EFL League Two

    1 · Crawley Town 21%X 24%56% Chesterfield · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Crawley Town – Chesterfield

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The head-to-head record between Crawley Town and Chesterfield offers minimal insight with just two matches ending in draws. This small sample pales in comparison to current form and expected goals, where Chesterfield holds the clear advantage. The visitors are riding high with 11 points compared to Crawley's mere four, further emphasized by their superior xPoints tally of 13.2 against Crawley's 7.3.

    Crawley Town's recent form is decidedly bleak, having suffered three consecutive defeats. Their defensive vulnerabilities are stark, conceding an average of 2.0 expected goals against per match. Chesterfield, on the other hand, exhibits tighter defensive control, allowing just 1.1 xGA per game. This defensive solidity, combined with an xG of 1.8 per match, positions the visitors as the more robust side.

    Despite both teams leaning towards possession-based play, Chesterfield's approach has been more effective. Crawley's struggles are compounded by their inability to convert possession into tangible results, which makes Chesterfield's 56% probability of victory appear reasonable. The likelihood of a 1-2 or 0-1 scoreline reflects this disparity, with the model favoring a Chesterfield win.

    The betting angle here is clear. With over 2.5 goals and both teams to score each pegged at 57%, there's value to be found. Bet365 offers Chesterfield to win at 2.00, a standout given their form. While Crawley’s attack has been underwhelming, Chesterfield’s defensive capabilities could restrict them, making a Chesterfield triumph the sensible play.

    Crawley TownCrawley Town
    Form LDLLL
    League ranking xG #10xGA #24xT #11xP/match #23Points #24
    Key players
    • Adetokunbo Bamidele AdeyemoRWxG 0.05 · xT 0.13
    • Jude ArthursCMxG 0.16 · xT 0.03
    • Dylan MorganFxG 0.34 · xT 0.03
    ChesterfieldChesterfield
    Form DDWWL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #8xT #6xP/match #3Points #10
    Key players
    • Lee BonisFxG 0.61 · xT 0.02
    • Dilan MarkandayRWxG 0.28 · xT 0.11
    • Remeao Andrew HuttonRWBxG 0.02 · xT 0.33

    Match prediction: Crawley Town – Chesterfield

    Predicted score matrix

    Chesterfield →
    Crawley Town →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.6%
    0–19.2%
    0–28.6%
    0–35.2%
    0–4+3.6%
    1
    1–05.6%
    1–111.1%
    1–29.8%
    1–35.9%
    1–4+4.0%
    2
    2–03.4%
    2–16.1%
    2–25.6%
    2–33.4%
    2–4+2.3%
    3
    3–01.3%
    3–12.3%
    3–22.1%
    3–31.3%
    3–4+0.9%
    4+
    4+–00.5%
    4+–10.8%
    4+–20.8%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-210%
    3. 3.0-19%
    4. 4.0-29%
    5. 5.2-16%
    Expected goals
    1,13–1,81
    Both teams to score
    57%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,543%
    @2.30
    Over 2,557%
    @1.55

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Chesterfield to win56%
    • Over 1.5 goals80%

    Combined probability

    44%

    Fair odds

    2.29

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Chesterfield to win56%
    • Over 2.5 goals57%
    • Ruel Dimitrios Sotiriou to score29%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score57%
    • Over 2.5 goals57%
    • Ruel Dimitrios Sotiriou to score29%
    • Jude Arthurs to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 3.566% probability@1.53LeoVegasEV+1%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Crawley TownX2 · Chesterfield
    LeoVegas4.404.001.64

    Odds updated 4 Oct, 03:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Chesterfield win since 3 October — the odds have shortened from 1.73 to 1.64 (−5%).

    1+14 %
    25 %20 %

    3.85 → 4.40

    X+1 %
    25 %20 %

    3.95 → 4.00

    2-5 %
    57 %52 %

    1.73 → 1.64

    Over 2,50 %
    62 %57 %

    1.55 → 1.55

    LeoVegas · 4 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Crawley Town 0Draw 2Chesterfield 0
    Goals: 3–3 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Crawley Town have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Crawley Town
    Chesterfield
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Crawley Town (6–13)
    Chesterfield (11–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Crawley Town
    Charlie Mel Barker: 288 passningar, xT 0.33BarkerPriestley Tyler Heginbottom Farquharson: 258 passningar, xT 0.59FarquharsonJude Arthurs: 220 passningar, xT 0.11ArthursAdetokunbo Bamidele Adeyemo: 176 passningar, xT 0.34AdeyemoNicholas Jake Michalski: 112 passningar, xT 0.18MichalskiLouie Shaun Watson: 108 passningar, xT -0.07WatsonAkinwale Joseph Odimayo: 106 passningar, xT 0.23OdimayoKlaudio Krasniqi: 96 passningar, xT 0.25KrasniqiJackson Izquierdo: 90 passningar, xT 0.06IzquierdoJonathan Russell: 84 passningar, xT 0.25RussellKellan Gordon: 77 passningar, xT 0.66Gordon
    Chesterfield
    Lewis Gordon: 232 passningar, xT 0.71GordonRemeao Andrew Hutton: 209 passningar, xT 1.67HuttonJack Benjamin Simpson: 207 passningar, xT 0.59SimpsonKyle Mcfadzean: 204 passningar, xT 0.36McfadzeanGeorge McEachran: 189 passningar, xT 0.46McEachranRyan Stirk: 186 passningar, xT 0.45StirkRyan Thomas William Boot: 123 passningar, xT 0.21BootDilan Markanday: 119 passningar, xT 0.59MarkandayLouie Marsh: 106 passningar, xT 0.02MarshLiam Mandeville: 94 passningar, xT -0.06MandevilleJoel John Randall: 53 passningar, xT 0.34Randall
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Crawley Town
    Charlie Mel Barker: 288 passningar, xT 0.33BarkerPriestley Tyler Heginbottom Farquharson: 258 passningar, xT 0.59FarquharsonJude Arthurs: 220 passningar, xT 0.11ArthursAdetokunbo Bamidele Adeyemo: 176 passningar, xT 0.34AdeyemoNicholas Jake Michalski: 112 passningar, xT 0.18MichalskiLouie Shaun Watson: 108 passningar, xT -0.07WatsonAkinwale Joseph Odimayo: 106 passningar, xT 0.23OdimayoKlaudio Krasniqi: 96 passningar, xT 0.25KrasniqiJackson Izquierdo: 90 passningar, xT 0.06IzquierdoJonathan Russell: 84 passningar, xT 0.25RussellKellan Gordon: 77 passningar, xT 0.66Gordon
    Chesterfield
    Lewis Gordon: 232 passningar, xT 0.71GordonRemeao Andrew Hutton: 209 passningar, xT 1.67HuttonJack Benjamin Simpson: 207 passningar, xT 0.59SimpsonKyle Mcfadzean: 204 passningar, xT 0.36McfadzeanGeorge McEachran: 189 passningar, xT 0.46McEachranRyan Stirk: 186 passningar, xT 0.45StirkRyan Thomas William Boot: 123 passningar, xT 0.21BootDilan Markanday: 119 passningar, xT 0.59MarkandayLouie Marsh: 106 passningar, xT 0.02MarshLiam Mandeville: 94 passningar, xT -0.06MandevilleJoel John Randall: 53 passningar, xT 0.34Randall

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCrawley TownChesterfield
    Points411
    xPoints7.313.2
    xG per match1.31.8
    xGA per match21.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.220.42
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.40.32
    Playing styleCrawley TownChesterfield
    Build-up efficiency0.310.33
    Field tilt0.550.67
    xT per match0.91
    xTA per match1.20.78
    Won balls, offensive half2326
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.380.36
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.360.34
    Entries into the box per match1216
    Entries into the box against149
    Pass completion %0.730.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.72
    Passes per match338388
    Passes against per match225268
    Switches of play per match2638
    Long balls per match2946
    Set piecesCrawley TownChesterfield
    xG from free kicks0.030.01
    Corners per match4.35
    Corners against per match5.23
    xG per corner0.030.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.480.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.540.52
    OtherCrawley TownChesterfield
    Throw-in control0.790.84
    The goalkeepersNicholas Jake Michalski (Crawley Town)Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield)
    Saves1620
    Save %64%67%
    xG prevented52%66%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Crawley Town vs Chesterfield according to our model?

    The model gives Chesterfield a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crawley Town 21%, draw 24%, Chesterfield 56%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.