01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Shrewsbury Town or draw (1X)66%
- Under 3.5 goals82%
EFL League TwoNew Meadow, Shrewsbury11°0,5 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The midfield battle is set to be a defining feature in this clash between Shrewsbury Town and Exeter City. With both teams showcasing distinct playing styles, Shrewsbury’s direct approach and Exeter’s possession-based game form a fascinating contrast. The hosts have a slight edge, reflected in their superior xPoints and xG metrics, but these margins are slim and the draw remains a tantalizing prospect at 35%.
Shrewsbury's organized defense has been a cornerstone of their performance, conceding just 0.96 xGA per match. This solid foundation gives them a slight advantage on paper, especially given Exeter's vulnerability at the back, allowing 1.2 xGA per match. However, the visitors' ability to control possession could disrupt Shrewsbury's rhythm, highlighting the potential for a closely contested match.
Despite Shrewsbury's edge in expected goals, the most likely scoreline is a 1-1 draw at 14%, with both the 1-0 home win and the 0-1 away win equally probable at 12%. The model’s probabilities, showing a near balance between the draw and either side winning, suggest a cautious affair with limited scoring opportunities. This aligns with a low probability of over 2.5 goals at 37%, pointing towards a game likely to stay under that mark.
Exeter's reliance on possession may not translate into goals, given their lower xG per match. Shrewsbury, meanwhile, might find it challenging to break down a team intent on controlling the play. Hence, the 45% chance of both teams scoring seems justified, but far from certain.
From a betting perspective, the draw offers value with its 35% likelihood and odds reflecting that outcome, especially when considering both teams' closely matched stats. While Shrewsbury holds the statistical edge, the draw at current prices could be the sharpest angle for those looking to exploit market misalignments.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Shrewsbury Town | X | 2 · Exeter City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.25 | EV+ 15% 3.30 | 2.95 |
| LeoVegas | 2.25 | EV+ 13% 3.25 | 3.00 |
| Nordicbet | 2.25 | EV+ 15% 3.30 | 2.95 |
Odds updated 4 Oct, 03:36
2.25 → 2.25
3.30 → 3.25
3.00 → 3.00
1.98 → 2.08
LeoVegas · 5 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Shrewsbury Town | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 8 | 6 |
| xPoints | 12.5 | 11.8 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 0.96 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.21 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Playing style | Shrewsbury Town | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 0.93 | 0.61 |
| xTA per match | 0.81 | 0.9 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.6 | 0.62 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.57 | 0.6 |
| Passes per match | 204 | 220 |
| Passes against per match | 323 | 303 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.4 | 15.8 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Shrewsbury Town | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 5.2 | 4.5 |
| Corners against per match | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.46 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.74 | 0.49 |
| Other | Shrewsbury Town | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | William Michael Brook (Shrewsbury Town) | Jack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 13 | 24 |
| Save % | 50% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 33% | 52% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model sees a draw as the most likely outcome: Shrewsbury Town 34%, draw 35%, Exeter City 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 37% and under at 63%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.