01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Oldham Athletic to win54%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
EFL League TwoBoundary Park, Oldham9°4,8 mm19 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: Oldham Athletic's recent slump, losing four consecutive matches, sets the stage for a critical matchup against Accrington Stanley, whose slight statistical edges in xPoints and xG per match suggest a more complex narrative than the odds alone imply. Oldham has a 54% probability of winning, yet their form is a red flag. The predicted 1-0 or 2-0 scorelines highlight how the hosts' expected goals of 1.69 may suffice against Accrington's 0.94, pointing to a narrow win despite their current struggles.
The playing styles of both teams—characterized by low defensive setups and direct play—could neutralize each other, especially given the forecast of 11.4 mm of rain. Such conditions typically lead to fewer goals, a factor already reflected in the model's numbers. The even chance of both teams scoring (50%) further supports the idea of a tightly contested affair where the first goal becomes crucial.
Oldham's defensive issues are apparent in their recent form, yet they retain an advantage in xGA, allowing fewer goals on average than Stanley. Conversely, the visitors have shown a knack for creating chances within 8 seconds of winning the ball, an area where they lead with 0.49 xG. This dynamism might exploit Oldham's vulnerabilities if the hosts fail to regain their defensive shape quickly.
It's tempting to favor Oldham given their statistical and home advantage, but Accrington's resilience and marginal edges in attacking metrics suggest this is not straightforward. The small head-to-head sample since 2023 (one win apiece) doesn't settle the matter either, although it somewhat tilts towards a balanced contest.
For bettors, the most tangible edge might lie in backing Oldham despite recent losses. While the over 2.5 goals market sits at 49%, the weather and styles advise caution, suggesting a more prudent lean towards under 2.5 goals at 51%.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Oldham Athletic | X | 2 · Accrington Stanley |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.60 | EV+ 1% 3.85 | 4.90 |
| LeoVegas | 1.64 | EV+ 2% 3.90 | 4.40 |
| Nordicbet | 1.60 | EV+ 1% 3.85 | 4.90 |
Odds updated 3 Oct, 23:36
1.64 → 1.64
3.95 → 3.90
4.33 → 4.40
1.67 → 1.73
LeoVegas · 7 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 03/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Oldham Athletic | Accrington Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 7 |
| xPoints | 10.5 | 11.6 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.39 | 0.49 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.1 | 0.43 |
| Playing style | Oldham Athletic | Accrington Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.5 | 0.44 |
| xT per match | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| xTA per match | 0.98 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.4 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.36 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.65 | 0.6 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.57 |
| Passes per match | 254 | 214 |
| Passes against per match | 327 | 263 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.1 | 18.9 |
| Long balls per match | 38 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Oldham Athletic | Accrington Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 5.5 | 3.9 |
| Corners against per match | 4.5 | 5.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.34 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.76 |
| Other | Oldham Athletic | Accrington Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Mathew Anthony Hudson (Oldham Athletic) | Louie Moulden (Accrington Stanley) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 28 |
| Save % | 59% | 70% |
| xG prevented | 50% | 51% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Oldham Athletic a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Oldham Athletic 54%, draw 26%, Accrington Stanley 20%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.