01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Rotherham United to win50%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
EFL League TwoNew York Stadium, Rotherham11°1,1 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
A small sample size of head-to-head encounters offers limited insight, leaving us to focus on current form and expected goals as Rotherham United hosts Gillingham. The home side has been backed by the model with a 50% probability of winning, emphasizing their defensive solidity and possession control, which contrasts with Gillingham's counter-attacking and crossing style.
Despite Gillingham holding a slight points advantage in the league table, Rotherham's expected points tell a different story, favoring them at 12.9 compared to Gillingham’s 11.0. The hosts seem more efficient in creating and denying chances, with an xG per match of 1.3 against Gillingham’s 1.1, and a superior defensive metric of 1.0 xGA versus Gillingham’s 1.4. These stats underline Rotherham's potential to control the game and limit Gillingham's opportunities, particularly given the damp conditions expected.
The most likely scorelines reinforce a low-scoring narrative, with both 1-0 and 1-1 sitting at 12% probability each. The rain might further dampen attacking flair, suppressing the likelihood of a high-scoring affair, which aligns with the model's 47% chance of over 2.5 goals and suggests a lean towards under. Both teams to score nearly breaks even at 49%, but defensive discipline from Rotherham could edge Gillingham out.
For bettors seeking value, Bet365 offers Rotherham to win at odds of 2.00, which aligns remarkably with the model’s probability, suggesting a potential edge. While not a guarantee, a focused play on Rotherham’s win, coupled with an under 2.5 goals bet, could offer a well-balanced approach to this League Two clash — perhaps not thrilling, but precisely the kind of careful wager that pays the bills.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Rotherham United | X | 2 · Gillingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.85 | 3.40 | 4.10 |
| LeoVegas | 1.80 | EV+ 1% 3.55 | 4.00 |
| Nordicbet | 1.85 | 3.40 | 4.10 |
Odds updated 4 Oct, 00:36
1.80 → 1.80
3.50 → 3.55
4.10 → 4.00
1.91 → 1.91
LeoVegas · 4 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 03/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Rotherham United | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 12 |
| xPoints | 12.9 | 11 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Rotherham United | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 0.69 | 0.79 |
| xTA per match | 0.74 | 0.91 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.39 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.36 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.58 |
| Passes per match | 279 | 236 |
| Passes against per match | 277 | 332 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.9 | 15.8 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Rotherham United | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 4 | 3.6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.23 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.61 |
| Other | Rotherham United | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Ted Cann (Rotherham United) | Oliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 19 |
| Save % | 63% | 86% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 90% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Rotherham United a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rotherham United 50%, draw 29%, Gillingham 22%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.