01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Exeter City or draw (1X)70%
- Under 3.5 goals81%
EFL League TwoSt James Park, Exeter15°8,4 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT (corrected):
Rotherham United’s slight edge in xG per match at 1.4 compared to Exeter City's 1.3 suggests a nuanced battle, underscoring the model's slight lean toward the hosts. Yet, despite Rotherham's technical superiority in expected points and goals allowed, the visitors' overall model probability stands at just 28%. The numbers imply a closely contested match, with Exeter's home advantage perhaps tipping the scale.
Exeter City’s probability of securing a win is calculated at 43%, supported by their expected goals of 1.22. This is in stark contrast to Rotherham's 1.0 xG. The most likely outcomes are tightly grouped: a 1-1 draw at 14% is the top predicted scoreline, highlighting a low-scoring expectation. The over 2.5 goals probability sits at 38%, hinting at a lean towards the under.
In betting terms, Exeter City is where potential value may lie, given their higher probability of victory, while the expected tight affair suggests caution on goal-heavy markets. With both teams playing a possession-control style, the small head-to-head sample further directs focus on current form and xG figures.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Exeter City | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 6 |
| xPoints | 9.6 | 9.8 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.22 |
| Playing style | Exeter City | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.35 |
| Field tilt | 0.36 | 0.54 |
| xT per match | 0.63 | 0.77 |
| xTA per match | 0.93 | 0.76 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.62 | 0.67 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 216 | 282 |
| Passes against per match | 329 | 304 |
| Switches of play per match | 14.3 | 20.8 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Exeter City | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 4.4 | 3.6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 4.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.23 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.66 |
| Other | Exeter City | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Jack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City) | Ted Cann (Rotherham United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 20 | 12 |
| Save % | 80% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 53% | 39% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Exeter City a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Exeter City 43%, draw 29%, Rotherham United 28%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 38% and under at 62%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 45% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

250 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonus
100 kr gratisspel plus freespins
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.