Premier LeagueCoventry Building Society Arena, Coventry11°1,4 mm21 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Coventry CityCoventry CityLow block & direct
    vs
    Newcastle UnitedNewcastle UnitedBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Newcastle United (43%)

    Coventry City vs Newcastle United · Premier League

    1 · Coventry City 31%X 26%43% Newcastle United · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Coventry City – Newcastle United

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Newcastle United's balanced and physical approach is set to clash with Coventry City's direct style, creating an intriguing tactical battle. Although Newcastle holds a slight edge in model probability at 43% over Coventry's 31%, the most likely scorelines reflect a tight contest. Both the 1-1 draw and a narrow 0-1 victory for Newcastle are given similar probabilities, suggesting a competitive encounter despite the visitors’ higher league standing.

    Form shows Newcastle with a tangible lead in points, but a deeper dive into expected points reveals Coventry outperforming them slightly, with 5.0 xPoints against Newcastle's 4.4. This discrepancy hints at an underlying resilience in Coventry's performances, even if results haven't always followed. Nevertheless, Newcastle's marginally higher xG per match at 0.98 versus Coventry's 0.91 highlights their slight attacking advantage.

    Defensively, Coventry's xGA of 1.8 compares favorably to Newcastle's 2.0, indicating a potential chink in the visitors' armor. Yet, considering the expected goals model which leans towards Newcastle's overall superiority, Coventry might find it challenging to capitalize fully on these defensive frailties. The numbers suggest a cautious optimism for Newcastle, maintaining the upper hand without dominating proceedings.

    From a betting perspective, the over 2.5 goals market — priced at 54% probability — offers a subtle edge, though the likelihood of both teams scoring shares the same percentage. However, the sharper angle lies elsewhere: Newcastle United to win outright at 43% probability suggests value, especially if odds are longer than evens. Keep an eye on bookmakers like Bet365 offering competitive lines on Newcastle's win, which, while not a guarantee, aligns with the model's lean towards the visitors.

    Coventry CityCoventry City
    Form LLLLW
    League ranking xG #20xGA #17xT #15xP/match #17Points #18
    Key players
    • Ephron Mason ClarkFxG 0.31 · xT 0.10
    • Jay DasilvaLWBxG 0.06 · xT 0.17
    • Jack RudoniLWxG 0.22 · xT 0.27
    Newcastle UnitedNewcastle United
    Form DWDLW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #19xT #19xP/match #19Points #9
    Key players
    • Anthony ElangaRWxG 0.11 · xT 0.13
    • Yoane WissaFxG 0.40 · xT 0.01
    • Lewis HallLBxG 0.07 · xT 0.19

    Match prediction: Coventry City – Newcastle United

    Predicted score matrix

    Newcastle United →
    Coventry City →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.2%
    0–110.3%
    0–29.5%
    0–35.7%
    0–4+3.8%
    1
    1–05.8%
    1–111.3%
    1–29.8%
    1–35.9%
    1–4+4.0%
    2
    2–03.2%
    2–15.7%
    2–25.1%
    2–33.0%
    2–4+2.0%
    3
    3–01.1%
    3–12.0%
    3–21.8%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.7%
    4+
    4+–00.4%
    4+–10.6%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.0-110%
    3. 3.1-210%
    4. 4.0-29%
    5. 5.0-06%
    Expected goals
    1,04–1,79
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,546%
    –
    Over 2,554%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Newcastle United or draw (X2)79%
    • Over 1.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    62%

    Fair odds

    1.61

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Newcastle United or draw (X2)79%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Harvey Lewis Barnes to score21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Taiwo Micheal Awoniyi to score29%
    • Nicolás González Iglesias to be booked18%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Coventry City
    Newcastle United
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Coventry City (1–10)
    Newcastle United (9–9)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Coventry City
    Matt Grimes: 198 passningar, xT 0.18GrimesBobby Thomas: 140 passningar, xT 0.52ThomasJay Dasilva: 137 passningar, xT 0.76DasilvaCarl Rushworth: 135 passningar, xT 0.3RushworthAurèle Amenda: 124 passningar, xT 0.18AmendaMilan Van Ewijk: 113 passningar, xT 0.32EwijkCaleb Yirenkyi: 85 passningar, xT 0.13YirenkyiJack Rudoni: 84 passningar, xT 0.82RudoniFrank Onyeka: 57 passningar, xT 0.02OnyekaEthan Pinnock: 51 passningar, xT 0.06PinnockLoum Tchaouna: 47 passningar, xT 0.27Tchaouna
    Newcastle United
    Sven Botman: 237 passningar, xT 0.5BotmanLewis Hall: 230 passningar, xT 0.91HallLewis Miley: 209 passningar, xT 0.26MileyMalick Thiaw: 207 passningar, xT -0.08ThiawSean Steur: 140 passningar, xT 0.06SteurLukáš Horníček: 115 passningar, xT 0.08HorníčekAmar Dedić: 107 passningar, xT 0.2DedićJoe Willock: 97 passningar, xT 0.02WillockNico Gonzalez: 92 passningar, xT 0.16GonzalezHarvey Barnes: 80 passningar, xT 0.25BarnesYoane Wissa: 60 passningar, xT -0.03Wissa
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Coventry City
    Matt Grimes: 198 passningar, xT 0.18GrimesBobby Thomas: 140 passningar, xT 0.52ThomasJay Dasilva: 137 passningar, xT 0.76DasilvaCarl Rushworth: 135 passningar, xT 0.3RushworthAurèle Amenda: 124 passningar, xT 0.18AmendaMilan Van Ewijk: 113 passningar, xT 0.32EwijkCaleb Yirenkyi: 85 passningar, xT 0.13YirenkyiJack Rudoni: 84 passningar, xT 0.82RudoniFrank Onyeka: 57 passningar, xT 0.02OnyekaEthan Pinnock: 51 passningar, xT 0.06PinnockLoum Tchaouna: 47 passningar, xT 0.27Tchaouna
    Newcastle United
    Sven Botman: 237 passningar, xT 0.5BotmanLewis Hall: 230 passningar, xT 0.91HallLewis Miley: 209 passningar, xT 0.26MileyMalick Thiaw: 207 passningar, xT -0.08ThiawSean Steur: 140 passningar, xT 0.06SteurLukáš Horníček: 115 passningar, xT 0.08HorníčekAmar Dedić: 107 passningar, xT 0.2DedićJoe Willock: 97 passningar, xT 0.02WillockNico Gonzalez: 92 passningar, xT 0.16GonzalezHarvey Barnes: 80 passningar, xT 0.25BarnesYoane Wissa: 60 passningar, xT -0.03Wissa

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCoventry CityNewcastle United
    Points38
    xPoints54.4
    xG per match0.910.98
    xGA per match1.82
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.060.12
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.380.62
    Playing styleCoventry CityNewcastle United
    Build-up efficiency0.340.31
    Field tilt0.320.44
    xT per match0.870.61
    xTA per match1.10.99
    Won balls, offensive half2520
    Pressing intensity0.250.24
    Pressing efficiency0.220.29
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.160.24
    Entries into the box per match109
    Entries into the box against1515
    Pass completion %0.720.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.690.73
    Passes per match270344
    Passes against per match502352
    Switches of play per match20.821.4
    Long balls per match3226
    Set piecesCoventry CityNewcastle United
    xG from free kicks0.070.03
    Corners per match44.4
    Corners against per match4.66
    xG per corner0.010.02
    xGA per corner against0.010.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.350.27
    First touch, defensive corners %0.610.57
    OtherCoventry CityNewcastle United
    Throw-in control0.770.69
    The goalkeepersCarl Rushworth (Coventry City)Lukáš Horníček (Newcastle United)
    Saves1020
    Save %56%74%
    xG prevented43%61%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Coventry City vs Newcastle United according to our model?

    The model gives Newcastle United a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Coventry City 31%, draw 26%, Newcastle United 43%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.