Premier LeaguePortman Road, Ipswich12°1,0 mm22 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Ipswich TownIpswich TownBalanced & physical
    vs
    FulhamFulhamPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Fulham (42%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.09 (+7 %)

    Ipswich Town vs Fulham · Premier League

    1 · Ipswich Town 30%X 28%42% Fulham · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Ipswich Town – Fulham

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Fulham's edge in the model probabilities at 42% captures the heart of this matchup against Ipswich Town. Despite the hosts’ recent points advantage in the season, Fulham's superior expected goals per match (1.7) and lower expected goals against (1.4) suggest a more robust underlying performance. This contrast between tangible points and underlying metrics is pivotal.

    The Suffolk side, Ipswich, has performed roughly in line with expectations, translating their balanced and physical playing style into tangible results. However, the visitors' possession-oriented approach could neutralize Ipswich's physical edge, potentially swinging the momentum back in favor of the Londoners. Despite their low point tally, Fulham's xPoints superiority hints at a side that should be performing better than their current standings suggest.

    With the expected goals almost neck and neck — Ipswich at 1.29 against Fulham's 1.34 — and a close model prediction on the most likely scorelines, a low-scoring affair seems probable. The chance of a 1-1 draw at 13% edges out the other scenarios, but the 0-1 and 1-0 possibilities both at 9% underscore the tight nature of this contest. The model leans slightly towards the under 2.5 goals at 51%, reinforced by Ipswich's somewhat leaky defense against Fulham's more solid backline.

    For bettors, value emerges with LeoVegas offering odds of 2.5 for a Fulham win, aligning with the model's 42% win probability and presenting a 5% edge. Equally, the under 2.5 goals market at odds of 2.05 with LeoVegas provides a similar 5% value edge. While the head-to-head record is small, the inclination towards a narrow Fulham win, perhaps a disciplined 0-1, aligns with the broader statistical narrative and betting value.

    Ipswich TownIpswich Town
    Form WLLWL
    League ranking xG #14xGA #14xT #9xP/match #13Points #11
    Key players
    • EmersonnFxG 0.38 · xT 0.09
    • Marcelino NunezCMxG 0.03 · xT 0.02
    • Abdul FatawuRWxG 0.03 · xT 0.36
    FulhamFulham
    Form LLLDD
    League ranking xG #9xGA #9xT #7xP/match #11Points #19
    Key players
    • Joachim AndersenCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.06
    • Josh KingRWxG 0.25 · xT 0.03
    • Antonee RobinsonLWBxG 0.06 · xT 0.09

    Match prediction: Ipswich Town – Fulham

    Predicted score matrix

    Fulham →
    Ipswich Town →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.5%
    0–19.3%
    0–26.5%
    0–32.9%
    0–4+1.3%
    1
    1–08.9%
    1–112.8%
    1–28.4%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–06.0%
    2–18.0%
    2–25.4%
    2–32.4%
    2–4+1.1%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.4%
    3–22.3%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.5%
    4+–21.0%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,29–1,34
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,551%
    @2.09EV+7%
    Over 2,549%
    @1.76

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Fulham or draw (X2)65%
    • Under 3.5 goals73%

    Combined probability

    47%

    Fair odds

    2.11

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Fulham or draw (X2)65%
    • Under 2.5 goals51%
    • Rodrigo Muniz Carvalho to score26%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals49%
    • Rodrigo Muniz Carvalho to score26%
    • Joachim Christian Andersen to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.551% probability@2.09BetsafeEV+7%reference odds
    • Under 2.551% probability@2.09NordicbetEV+7%reference odds
    • Under 1.526% probability@4.14BetsafeEV+7%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Ipswich TownX2 · Fulham
    Betsafe2.723.45
    EV+ 5%
    2.50
    LeoVegas2.703.45
    EV+ 5%
    2.50
    Nordicbet2.753.45
    EV+ 5%
    2.50

    Odds updated 2 Oct, 16:36

    Odds movement

    1+2 %
    38 %33 %

    2.65 → 2.70

    X-1 %
    30 %25 %

    3.50 → 3.45

    20 %
    40 %35 %

    2.50 → 2.50

    Over 2,50 %
    57 %52 %

    1.68 → 1.68

    LeoVegas · 2 recorded price levels · 02/10/2026 → 02/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Ipswich Town 0Draw 2Fulham 0
    Goals: 3–3 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Ipswich Town
    Fulham
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Ipswich Town (7–11)
    Fulham (5–8)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Ipswich Town
    Issa Diop: 234 passningar, xT 0.13DiopSaša Lukić: 207 passningar, xT 0.17LukićDara O'Shea: 173 passningar, xT 0.58O'SheaJacob Greaves: 169 passningar, xT 0.16GreavesExequiel Palacios: 167 passningar, xT 0.08PalaciosLeif Davis: 131 passningar, xT 0.64DavisJulio Enciso: 96 passningar, xT 0.44EncisoKjell Scherpen: 96 passningar, xT 0.09ScherpenAbdoul Ouattara: 86 passningar, xT 0.07OuattaraMarcelino Nunez: 60 passningar, xT 0.01NunezJack Clarke: 57 passningar, xT 0.21Clarke
    Fulham
    Calvin Bassey: 307 passningar, xT 0.49BasseyAlex Iwobi: 261 passningar, xT 0.73IwobiSander Berge: 216 passningar, xT 0.07BergeTimothy Castagne: 198 passningar, xT 0.39CastagneAntonee Robinson: 196 passningar, xT 0.44RobinsonBernd Leno: 173 passningar, xT -0.04LenoShea Charles: 170 passningar, xT 0.07CharlesJoachim Andersen: 166 passningar, xT 0.14AndersenJosh King: 130 passningar, xT 0.03KingOscar Bobb: 95 passningar, xT 0.55BobbDavid Affengruber: 94 passningar, xT 0.07Affengruber
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Ipswich Town
    Issa Diop: 234 passningar, xT 0.13DiopSaša Lukić: 207 passningar, xT 0.17LukićDara O'Shea: 173 passningar, xT 0.58O'SheaJacob Greaves: 169 passningar, xT 0.16GreavesExequiel Palacios: 167 passningar, xT 0.08PalaciosLeif Davis: 131 passningar, xT 0.64DavisJulio Enciso: 96 passningar, xT 0.44EncisoKjell Scherpen: 96 passningar, xT 0.09ScherpenAbdoul Ouattara: 86 passningar, xT 0.07OuattaraMarcelino Nunez: 60 passningar, xT 0.01NunezJack Clarke: 57 passningar, xT 0.21Clarke
    Fulham
    Calvin Bassey: 307 passningar, xT 0.49BasseyAlex Iwobi: 261 passningar, xT 0.73IwobiSander Berge: 216 passningar, xT 0.07BergeTimothy Castagne: 198 passningar, xT 0.39CastagneAntonee Robinson: 196 passningar, xT 0.44RobinsonBernd Leno: 173 passningar, xT -0.04LenoShea Charles: 170 passningar, xT 0.07CharlesJoachim Andersen: 166 passningar, xT 0.14AndersenJosh King: 130 passningar, xT 0.03KingOscar Bobb: 95 passningar, xT 0.55BobbDavid Affengruber: 94 passningar, xT 0.07Affengruber

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceIpswich TownFulham
    Points62
    xPoints6.47.3
    xG per match1.21.7
    xGA per match1.61.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.190.41
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.21
    Playing styleIpswich TownFulham
    Build-up efficiency0.290.33
    Field tilt0.380.5
    xT per match0.941
    xTA per match0.881.2
    Won balls, offensive half2019
    Pressing intensity0.240.26
    Pressing efficiency0.210.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.180.26
    Entries into the box per match814
    Entries into the box against1515
    Pass completion %0.760.8
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.76
    Passes per match338475
    Passes against per match438393
    Switches of play per match18.134
    Long balls per match2731
    Set piecesIpswich TownFulham
    xG from free kicks0.010
    Corners per match3.65.7
    Corners against per match5.25.3
    xG per corner0.020.01
    xGA per corner against0.010.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.170.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.580.46
    OtherIpswich TownFulham
    Throw-in control0.70.75
    The goalkeepersKjell Scherpen (Ipswich Town)Bernd Leno (Fulham)
    Saves1617
    Save %64%68%
    xG prevented49%55%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Ipswich Town vs Fulham according to our model?

    The model gives Fulham a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Ipswich Town 30%, draw 28%, Fulham 42%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.