Premier LeagueSelhurst Park, London13°0,2 mm17 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Crystal PalaceCrystal PalaceLow block & direct
    vs
    Nottingham ForestNottingham ForestLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Nottingham Forest (39%)

    Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest · Premier League

    1 · Crystal Palace 31%X 30%39% Nottingham Forest · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Crystal Palace – Nottingham Forest

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    The numbers paint a vivid picture of Crystal Palace's struggles in front of goal. Averaging just 0.91 expected goals (xG) per match, the hosts have found it difficult to carve out clear opportunities, which is a stark contrast to Nottingham Forest's more productive 1.7 xG per game. This attacking disparity suggests that the visitors are more likely to find the back of the net, despite the notoriously challenging atmosphere at Selhurst Park.

    Defensively, the story isn't much different for Palace. Conceding 2.2 expected goals against (xGA) per game, their backline has proven porous, especially in comparison to Forest's relatively tight 1.1 xGA. These figures hint at a tactical vulnerability for Palace, one that Forest, with their direct playing style, will look to exploit. The clash of similar low-defence, direct styles might ironically lead to a match that hinges on fine margins, precisely where Palace have often faltered.

    Recent head-to-head encounters, albeit based on a small sample of four matches, don't favor the Eagles either. With no wins and just a single loss to Forest, the psychological edge seems absent. Meanwhile, the visitors will arrive with the confidence of having seen off Palace before, adding another layer to their potential tactical advantage.

    From a betting perspective, Nottingham Forest emerges as the value bet here. Priced attractively at bookmakers and given the model's 39% win probability, which exceeds the draw and home win probabilities, Forest offers a promising angle. The most likely scoreline indicates a 1-1 draw, but with Forest's slight edge in both xG and xGA metrics, a 1-0 victory for the visitors seems plausible.

    Finally, with the over/under 2.5 goals market leaning towards the under at 58%, this match is expected to be low-scoring. The analytical edge lies with Forest, especially if defensive discipline and pragmatic attacking can translate predictions into reality.

    Crystal PalaceCrystal Palace
    Form LLWLD
    League ranking xG #19xGA #20xT #11xP/match #20Points #15
    Key players
    • Tyrick MitchellLWBxG 0.08 · xT 0.16
    • Anan KhalailiRWBxG 0.12 · xT 0.11
    • Adam WhartonCMxG 0.03 · xT 0.12
    Nottingham ForestNottingham Forest
    Form LDDWL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #4xT #3xP/match #5Points #13
    Key players
    • Liam DelapFxG 0.37 · xT 0.04
    • Morgan Gibbs WhiteRWxG 0.26 · xT 0.21
    • Neco WilliamsLWxG 0.07 · xT 0.15

    Match prediction: Crystal Palace – Nottingham Forest

    Predicted score matrix

    Nottingham Forest →
    Crystal Palace →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–010.0%
    0–111.4%
    0–27.3%
    0–33.0%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–010.3%
    1–113.5%
    1–28.1%
    1–33.3%
    1–4+1.3%
    2
    2–05.9%
    2–17.3%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.8%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–02.2%
    3–12.7%
    3–21.7%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–00.8%
    4+–11.0%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.0-111%
    3. 3.1-010%
    4. 4.0-010%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,11–1,23
    Both teams to score
    48%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,558%
    @1.83EV+7%
    Over 2,542%
    @2.04

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Nottingham Forest or draw (X2)67%
    • Under 3.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.87

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Nottingham Forest or draw (X2)67%
    • Under 2.5 goals58%
    • Liam Rory Delap to score24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score48%
    • Over 2.5 goals42%
    • Liam Rory Delap to score24%
    • Xaver Schlager to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Nottingham Forest39% probability@2.75NordicbetEV+8%reference odds
    • Under 1.532% probability@3.40BetsafeEV+8%reference odds
    • Under 1.532% probability@3.40NordicbetEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Crystal PalaceX2 · Nottingham Forest
    Betsafe2.603.25
    EV+ 7%
    2.72
    LeoVegas2.603.30
    EV+ 6%
    2.70
    Nordicbet2.603.30
    EV+ 8%
    2.75
    Pinnacle2.62
    EV+ 2%
    3.42
    EV+ 4%
    2.64

    Odds updated 2 Oct, 15:36

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Crystal Palace 0Draw 3Nottingham Forest 1
    Goals: 3–4 (⌀ 1,8)

    Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Crystal Palace
    Nottingham Forest
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Crystal Palace (6–11)
    Nottingham Forest (4–5)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Crystal Palace
    Chris Richards: 193 passningar, xT 0.21RichardsJaydee Canvot: 192 passningar, xT 0.2CanvotDaichi Kamada: 167 passningar, xT 0.18KamadaAdam Wharton: 158 passningar, xT 0.52WhartonTyrick Mitchell: 128 passningar, xT 0.58MitchellAnan Khalaili: 128 passningar, xT 0.28KhalailiYeremy Pino: 105 passningar, xT 0.5PinoTakehiro Tomiyasu: 90 passningar, xT 0.09TomiyasuDean Henderson: 76 passningar, xT -0.03HendersonAxel Disasi: 75 passningar, xT -0.06DisasiQuinten Timber: 72 passningar, xT -0.07Timber
    Nottingham Forest
    Murillo: 201 passningar, xT 0.55MurilloNeco Williams: 161 passningar, xT 0.59WilliamsJames McAtee: 159 passningar, xT 0.54McAteeMorgan Gibbs White: 148 passningar, xT 0.77WhiteXaver Schlager: 134 passningar, xT 0.44SchlagerJair Cunha: 118 passningar, xT 0.26CunhaOla Aina: 96 passningar, xT 0.98AinaDaniel Munoz: 85 passningar, xT 0.47MunozMatz Sels: 84 passningar, xT 0.11SelsNikola Milenković: 77 passningar, xT 0.05MilenkovićIgor Jesus: 70 passningar, xT 0.03Jesus
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Crystal Palace
    Chris Richards: 193 passningar, xT 0.21RichardsJaydee Canvot: 192 passningar, xT 0.2CanvotDaichi Kamada: 167 passningar, xT 0.18KamadaAdam Wharton: 158 passningar, xT 0.52WhartonTyrick Mitchell: 128 passningar, xT 0.58MitchellAnan Khalaili: 128 passningar, xT 0.28KhalailiYeremy Pino: 105 passningar, xT 0.5PinoTakehiro Tomiyasu: 90 passningar, xT 0.09TomiyasuDean Henderson: 76 passningar, xT -0.03HendersonAxel Disasi: 75 passningar, xT -0.06DisasiQuinten Timber: 72 passningar, xT -0.07Timber
    Nottingham Forest
    Murillo: 201 passningar, xT 0.55MurilloNeco Williams: 161 passningar, xT 0.59WilliamsJames McAtee: 159 passningar, xT 0.54McAteeMorgan Gibbs White: 148 passningar, xT 0.77WhiteXaver Schlager: 134 passningar, xT 0.44SchlagerJair Cunha: 118 passningar, xT 0.26CunhaOla Aina: 96 passningar, xT 0.98AinaDaniel Munoz: 85 passningar, xT 0.47MunozMatz Sels: 84 passningar, xT 0.11SelsNikola Milenković: 77 passningar, xT 0.05MilenkovićIgor Jesus: 70 passningar, xT 0.03Jesus

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCrystal PalaceNottingham Forest
    Points45
    xPoints4.28.2
    xG per match0.911.7
    xGA per match2.21.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.180.32
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.590.13
    Playing styleCrystal PalaceNottingham Forest
    Build-up efficiency0.310.33
    Field tilt0.390.55
    xT per match0.911.2
    xTA per match1.20.61
    Won balls, offensive half2323
    Pressing intensity0.250.23
    Pressing efficiency0.250.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.190.2
    Entries into the box per match714
    Entries into the box against1611
    Pass completion %0.770.74
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.7
    Passes per match337308
    Passes against per match469351
    Switches of play per match14.925.4
    Long balls per match2232
    Set piecesCrystal PalaceNottingham Forest
    xG from free kicks0.010.05
    Corners per match2.43.4
    Corners against per match4.84.6
    xG per corner0.030.04
    xGA per corner against0.030.03
    First touch, offensive corners %00.35
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.43
    OtherCrystal PalaceNottingham Forest
    Throw-in control0.710.79
    The goalkeepersDean Henderson (Crystal Palace)Matz Sels (Nottingham Forest)
    Saves1211
    Save %60%69%
    xG prevented47%66%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest according to our model?

    The model gives Nottingham Forest a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crystal Palace 31%, draw 30%, Nottingham Forest 39%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 42% and under at 58%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.