Ligue 2Stade Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand24°7 km/hUpdated

    Läs på svenska
    ClermontClermontBalanced & physical
    vs
    The model's lean: 2 · Reims (55%)
    ReimsReimsPossession control

    ClermontReims · Ligue 2

    1 · Clermont 21%X 23%55% Reims · 2
    ClermontClermont
    Form DLDWW
    League ranking xG #16xGA #15xT #16xP/match #17Points #13
    Key players
    • Famara DiedhiouFxG 0.37 · xT -0.01
    • Abdoul Kader BambaLWxG 0.16 · xT 0.1
    • Ivan MbahiaCBxG 0.04 · xT 0.09
    ReimsReims
    Form DWDDW
    League ranking xG #5xGA #6xT #2xP/match #8Points #5
    Key players
    • Hafiz Umar IbrahimFxG 0.47 · xT 0.02
    • Keito NakamuraLWxG 0.31 · xT 0.14
    • Teddy TeumaCAMxG 0.18 · xT 0.22

    Match prediction: ClermontReims

    Predicted score matrix

    Reims
    Clermont
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.8%
    0–111.6%
    0–29.6%
    0–35.1%
    0–4+2.9%
    1
    1–07.1%
    1–112.2%
    1–29.5%
    1–35.1%
    1–4+2.9%
    2
    2–03.7%
    2–15.9%
    2–24.7%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.4%
    3
    3–01.2%
    3–12.0%
    3–21.6%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–00.4%
    4+–10.6%
    4+–20.5%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.0-112%
    3. 3.0-210%
    4. 4.1-210%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    0,991,60
    Both teams to score
    51%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,552%
    @1.71
    Over 2,548%
    @2.12EV+2%

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Reims55% probability@1.97PinnacleEV+9%
    • Over 2.548% probability@2.12PinnacleEV+2%
    Bookmaker1 · ClermontX2 · Reims
    Pinnacle3.863.38
    EV+ 9%
    1.97

    Odds updated 4 Aug, 09:04

    Analysis: ClermontReims

    Erik Lindberg · · How the predictions work

    Reims have been the thorn in Clermont Foot's side, winning both encounters since 2023, and they’re riding high on a seven-match unbeaten streak. This is not mere luck; it’s a statement of intent from a team whose strategy revolves around possession control, dictating the tempo of matches, and suffocating opponents. The model gives Reims a commanding 55% chance to win against Clermont Foot's 21%, and with Clermont Foot's expected goals lingering at 0.99 versus Reims’ 1.60, it's hard to argue against the numbers that tip the scales heavily towards the visitors.

    Clermont Foot, while balanced and physical, find themselves struggling to translate that into tangible results against top-tier opposition. With a points total of 37 compared to Reims’ 56, the gap is as much about quality as it is about execution. The expected goals (xG) and expected goals against (xGA) metrics further illuminate the chasm: Clermont Foot's xG per match stands at 0.98, trailing Reims' more robust 1.4. The defensive end tells a similar tale, with Clermont's xGA at 1.3 against Reims' 1.0, underscoring Reims' overall superiority.

    Reims are not just positioned to win; they’re primed to do it efficiently. A 0-1 or 0-2 scoreline feels more probable than the 1-1 draw, given Reims' edge in both attacking and defensive metrics. Furthermore, the model’s valuation presents an enticing opportunity for punters. Pinnacle offers Reims at odds of 1.97, and with a calculated 9% edge, this represents a clear betting shot.

    The goals market also throws a bone: the 48% chance for the match to go over 2.5 goals doesn't scream value at first glance, yet Pinnacle’s odds of 2.12 do offer a sliver of positive expected value (EV+) at 2%. However, the sharper bet might just be backing Reims to continue their unbeaten run with another disciplined victory.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Clermont 0Draw 0Reims 2
    Goals: 15 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on Ligue 2 data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Reims are unbeaten in their last 7 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Clermont
    Reims
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Clermont (3844)
    Reims (5335)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Clermont
    Yoann Salmier: 174 passningar, xT 0.33SalmierIbrahim Coulibaly: 150 passningar, xT 0.91CoulibalySaïdou Sow: 142 passningar, xT 0.28SowIvan Mbahia: 123 passningar, xT 0.18MbahiaJohan Gastien: 119 passningar, xT 0.28GastienAbdellah Baallal: 113 passningar, xT 0.16BaallalHenri Saivet: 112 passningar, xT 0.09SaivetMaximiliano Caufriez: 97 passningar, xT 0.15CaufriezIlhan Fakili: 93 passningar, xT 0.98FakiliTheo Guivarch: 91 passningar, xT 0.18GuivarchAxel Camblan: 69 passningar, xT 0.6Camblan
    Reims
    Samuel Junior Kotto: 324 passningar, xT 0.71KottoThéo Leoni: 271 passningar, xT 0.34LeoniMaxime Busi: 251 passningar, xT 0.45BusiSergio Akieme: 227 passningar, xT 0.59AkiemeMory Gbane: 182 passningar, xT 0.03GbaneEwen Jaouen: 167 passningar, xT 0.2JaouenAbdoul Koné: 157 passningar, xT 0.17KonéMohamed Daramy: 142 passningar, xT 0.54DaramyN'Tamon Elie Ahouonon: 121 passningar, xT 0.2AhouononEloge Patrick Zabi Gueu: 116 passningar, xT 0.59GueuKeito Nakamura: 86 passningar, xT 0.03Nakamura
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Clermont
    Yoann Salmier: 174 passningar, xT 0.33SalmierIbrahim Coulibaly: 150 passningar, xT 0.91CoulibalySaïdou Sow: 142 passningar, xT 0.28SowIvan Mbahia: 123 passningar, xT 0.18MbahiaJohan Gastien: 119 passningar, xT 0.28GastienAbdellah Baallal: 113 passningar, xT 0.16BaallalHenri Saivet: 112 passningar, xT 0.09SaivetMaximiliano Caufriez: 97 passningar, xT 0.15CaufriezIlhan Fakili: 93 passningar, xT 0.98FakiliTheo Guivarch: 91 passningar, xT 0.18GuivarchAxel Camblan: 69 passningar, xT 0.6Camblan
    Reims
    Samuel Junior Kotto: 324 passningar, xT 0.71KottoThéo Leoni: 271 passningar, xT 0.34LeoniMaxime Busi: 251 passningar, xT 0.45BusiSergio Akieme: 227 passningar, xT 0.59AkiemeMory Gbane: 182 passningar, xT 0.03GbaneEwen Jaouen: 167 passningar, xT 0.2JaouenAbdoul Koné: 157 passningar, xT 0.17KonéMohamed Daramy: 142 passningar, xT 0.54DaramyN'Tamon Elie Ahouonon: 121 passningar, xT 0.2AhouononEloge Patrick Zabi Gueu: 116 passningar, xT 0.59GueuKeito Nakamura: 86 passningar, xT 0.03Nakamura

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceClermontReims
    Points3756
    xPoints39.347.1
    xG per match0.981.4
    xGA per match1.31
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.150.23
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.170.15
    Playing styleClermontReims
    Build-up efficiency0.310.34
    Field tilt0.410.64
    xT per match0.781.2
    xTA per match10.76
    Won balls, offensive half2025
    Pressing intensity0.230.21
    Pressing efficiency0.260.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.310.3
    Entries into the box per match816
    Entries into the box against148
    Pass completion %0.80.8
    Pass completion % under pressure0.760.76
    Passes per match381439
    Passes against per match369306
    Switches of play per match28.429.4
    Long balls per match3434
    Set piecesClermontReims
    xG from free kicks0.070.04
    Corners per match3.75.3
    Corners against per match5.93.2
    xG per corner0.030.03
    xGA per corner against0.040.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.650.54
    OtherClermontReims
    Throw-in control0.730.75
    The goalkeepersTheo Guivarch (Clermont)Ewen Jaouen (Reims)
    Saves8674
    Save %67%69%
    xG prevented53%48%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Clermont vs Reims according to our model?

    The model gives Reims a 55% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Clermont 21%, draw 23%, Reims 55%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.