Ligue 2Stade Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand25°8 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    ClermontClermontBalanced & physical
    00
    ReimsReimsPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Reims (55%)

    Clermont vs Reims · Ligue 2

    1 · Clermont 21%X 23%55% Reims · 2

    Analysis: ClermontReims

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    Reims have the wind at their back and it's not just the weather talking. With a commanding 55% model probability, they are firmly positioned as favorites against Clermont Foot, who haven’t managed a victory in their last two head-to-head bouts since 2023. Despite the small sample size, Clermont’s lack of wins against Reims is just one piece of a puzzle that tips heavily in favor of the visitors.

    Reims, powered by an impressive unbeaten streak spanning seven league matches, showcase a possession-driven style that suffocates opponents. Their expected goals (xG) of 1.60 dwarfs Clermont's 0.99, and that narrative extends across most metrics. Their xGA of 1.0 also indicates a defense more adept at controlling threats compared to Clermont’s 1.3. Not to mention, Reims’ points (56 vs. 37) and xPoints (47.1 vs. 39.3) further underscore their superiority this season.

    Clermont Foot, showcasing a balanced yet physical approach, might find their best hope in disrupting Reims’ rhythm. However, the expected goals suggest that even if they can hold off Reims’ attack to some extent, finding the back of the net themselves will be an uphill battle. With most likely scorelines showing a 1-1 and a 0-1 draw at 12%, it’s clear that the undercurrent suggests a tightly contested match — yet one that ultimately leans Reims’ way.

    The betting angle here is sharp: Reims at odds of 1.952 with Pinnacle offers an enticing 8% edge as assessed by the model, a significant value for savvy bettors. Though the over 2.5 goals bet has a smaller edge at odds of 2.13, the 48% likelihood suggests a cautious lean towards goals, yet with the possibility of windy conditions, it’s wise to tread carefully. Expect Reims to clinch a 0-1 victory, underlining their dominance, while the under 2.5 goals remains a prudent play.

    ClermontClermont
    Form DLDWW
    League ranking xG #16xGA #15xT #16xP/match #17Points #13
    Key players
    • Famara DiedhiouFxG 0.37 · xT -0.01
    • Abdoul Kader BambaLWxG 0.16 · xT 0.10
    • Ivan MbahiaCBxG 0.04 · xT 0.09
    ReimsReims
    Form DWDDW
    League ranking xG #5xGA #6xT #2xP/match #8Points #5
    Key players
    • Hafiz Umar IbrahimFxG 0.47 · xT 0.02
    • Keito NakamuraLWxG 0.31 · xT 0.14
    • Teddy TeumaCAMxG 0.18 · xT 0.22
    Final score
    00
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Clermont 21% · Draw 23% · Reims 55%

    Match prediction: ClermontReims

    Predicted score matrix

    Reims
    Clermont
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.8%
    0–111.6%
    0–29.6%
    0–35.1%
    0–4+2.9%
    1
    1–07.1%
    1–112.2%
    1–29.5%
    1–35.1%
    1–4+2.9%
    2
    2–03.7%
    2–15.9%
    2–24.7%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.4%
    3
    3–01.2%
    3–12.0%
    3–21.6%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–00.4%
    4+–10.6%
    4+–20.5%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.0-112%
    3. 3.0-210%
    4. 4.1-210%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    0,991,60
    Both teams to score
    51%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,552%
    @1.74
    Over 2,548%
    @2.14EV+3%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Reims to win55%
    • Under 3.5 goals74%

    Combined probability

    36%

    Fair odds

    2.79

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Reims to win55%
    • Under 2.5 goals52%
    • Keito Nakamura to score20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score51%
    • Over 2.5 goals48%
    • Keito Nakamura to score20%
    • Ange Martial Tia to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Reims55% probability@1.89PinnacleEV+5%reference odds
    • Over 2.548% probability@2.14PinnacleEV+3%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · ClermontX2 · Reims
    Pinnacle4.433.42
    EV+ 5%
    1.89

    Odds updated 8 Aug, 10:09

    Odds movement

    1+15 %
    25 %20 %

    3.864.43

    X+1 %
    31 %26 %

    3.383.42

    2-4 %
    52 %47 %

    1.971.89

    Over 2,5+1 %
    47 %42 %

    2.122.14

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 04/08/2026 → 08/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Clermont 0Draw 0Reims 2
    Goals: 15 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on Ligue 2 data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Reims are unbeaten in their last 7 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Clermont
    Reims
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Clermont (3844)
    Reims (5335)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Clermont
    Yoann Salmier: 174 passningar, xT 0.33SalmierIbrahim Coulibaly: 150 passningar, xT 0.91CoulibalySaïdou Sow: 142 passningar, xT 0.28SowIvan Mbahia: 123 passningar, xT 0.18MbahiaJohan Gastien: 119 passningar, xT 0.28GastienAbdellah Baallal: 113 passningar, xT 0.16BaallalHenri Saivet: 112 passningar, xT 0.09SaivetMaximiliano Caufriez: 97 passningar, xT 0.15CaufriezIlhan Fakili: 93 passningar, xT 0.98FakiliTheo Guivarch: 91 passningar, xT 0.18GuivarchAxel Camblan: 69 passningar, xT 0.6Camblan
    Reims
    Samuel Junior Kotto: 324 passningar, xT 0.71KottoThéo Leoni: 271 passningar, xT 0.34LeoniMaxime Busi: 251 passningar, xT 0.45BusiSergio Akieme: 227 passningar, xT 0.59AkiemeMory Gbane: 182 passningar, xT 0.03GbaneEwen Jaouen: 167 passningar, xT 0.2JaouenAbdoul Koné: 157 passningar, xT 0.17KonéMohamed Daramy: 142 passningar, xT 0.54DaramyN'Tamon Elie Ahouonon: 121 passningar, xT 0.2AhouononEloge Patrick Zabi Gueu: 116 passningar, xT 0.59GueuKeito Nakamura: 86 passningar, xT 0.03Nakamura
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Clermont
    Yoann Salmier: 174 passningar, xT 0.33SalmierIbrahim Coulibaly: 150 passningar, xT 0.91CoulibalySaïdou Sow: 142 passningar, xT 0.28SowIvan Mbahia: 123 passningar, xT 0.18MbahiaJohan Gastien: 119 passningar, xT 0.28GastienAbdellah Baallal: 113 passningar, xT 0.16BaallalHenri Saivet: 112 passningar, xT 0.09SaivetMaximiliano Caufriez: 97 passningar, xT 0.15CaufriezIlhan Fakili: 93 passningar, xT 0.98FakiliTheo Guivarch: 91 passningar, xT 0.18GuivarchAxel Camblan: 69 passningar, xT 0.6Camblan
    Reims
    Samuel Junior Kotto: 324 passningar, xT 0.71KottoThéo Leoni: 271 passningar, xT 0.34LeoniMaxime Busi: 251 passningar, xT 0.45BusiSergio Akieme: 227 passningar, xT 0.59AkiemeMory Gbane: 182 passningar, xT 0.03GbaneEwen Jaouen: 167 passningar, xT 0.2JaouenAbdoul Koné: 157 passningar, xT 0.17KonéMohamed Daramy: 142 passningar, xT 0.54DaramyN'Tamon Elie Ahouonon: 121 passningar, xT 0.2AhouononEloge Patrick Zabi Gueu: 116 passningar, xT 0.59GueuKeito Nakamura: 86 passningar, xT 0.03Nakamura

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceClermontReims
    Points3756
    xPoints39.347.1
    xG per match0.981.4
    xGA per match1.31
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.150.23
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.170.15
    Playing styleClermontReims
    Build-up efficiency0.310.34
    Field tilt0.410.64
    xT per match0.781.2
    xTA per match10.76
    Won balls, offensive half2025
    Pressing intensity0.230.21
    Pressing efficiency0.260.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.310.3
    Entries into the box per match816
    Entries into the box against148
    Pass completion %0.80.8
    Pass completion % under pressure0.760.76
    Passes per match381439
    Passes against per match369306
    Switches of play per match28.429.4
    Long balls per match3434
    Set piecesClermontReims
    xG from free kicks0.070.04
    Corners per match3.75.3
    Corners against per match5.93.2
    xG per corner0.030.03
    xGA per corner against0.040.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.650.54
    OtherClermontReims
    Throw-in control0.730.75
    The goalkeepersTheo Guivarch (Clermont)Ewen Jaouen (Reims)
    Saves8674
    Save %67%69%
    xG prevented53%48%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Clermont vs Reims according to our model?

    The model gives Reims a 55% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Clermont 21%, draw 23%, Reims 55%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.