Ligue 2Nouste Camp, Pau25°1,5 mm16 km/hUpdated

    Läs på svenska
    PauPauPossession control
    vs
    The model's lean: 2 · Annecy (38%)
    AnnecyAnnecyPossession control

    PauAnnecy · Ligue 2

    1 · Pau 34%X 29%38% Annecy · 2
    PauPau
    Form DDWLL
    League ranking xG #8xGA #11xT #5xP/match #9Points #9
    Key players
    • Anthony BriançonCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.09
    • Rayan TouzgharCAMxG 0.21 · xT 0.08
    • Daylam MeddahCBxG 0.05 · xT 0.07
    AnnecyAnnecy
    Form DWWWL
    League ranking xG #10xGA #4xT #12xP/match #4Points #7
    Key players
    • Clément BillemazLWxG 0.07 · xT 0.16
    • Thibault RambaudFxG 0.3 · xT 0.07
    • Ben Hamed TouréFxG 0.34 · xT 0.12

    Match prediction: PauAnnecy

    Predicted score matrix

    Annecy
    Pau
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.3%
    0–19.9%
    0–26.6%
    0–32.8%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–09.6%
    1–113.1%
    1–28.2%
    1–33.5%
    1–4+1.5%
    2
    2–06.2%
    2–17.9%
    2–25.1%
    2–32.2%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.3%
    3–22.1%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.3%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-110%
    3. 3.1-010%
    4. 4.0-08%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,251,28
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,554%
    @1.97EV+6%
    Over 2,546%
    @1.84

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.554% probability@1.97PinnacleEV+6%
    • 2 · Annecy38% probability@2.65PinnacleEV+0%
    Bookmaker1 · PauX2 · Annecy
    Pinnacle2.603.37
    EV+ 0%
    2.65

    Odds updated 4 Aug, 09:04

    Analysis: PauAnnecy

    Erik Lindberg · · How the predictions work

    51 points versus 45. That's the numerical edge that FC Annecy holds over Pau FC heading into this Ligue 2 clash, a subtle yet telling difference in the standings. The model, ever the impartial analyst, leans slightly towards FC Annecy with a 38% probability of victory. But this isn't just a numbers game; it’s a duel laced with intrigue as both teams share the same stylistic DNA — possession control. This could well become a chess match on grass, with both sides probing for openings rather than flying at each other's throats.

    FC Annecy brings a defensive edge to the table — an xGA of just 0.98 compared to Pau FC's 1.2. This defensive solidity might just tilt the scales their way, as Pau FC's attacking output mirrors their opponents at 1.2 xG per match. In their two head-to-head encounters since 2023, each side has tasted victory once, signaling a well-matched rivalry but lending a smidgeon of historical confidence to Pau FC despite the overall lean towards Annecy.

    A 1-1 draw sits at the top of the probability charts at 13%, showcasing the anticipation of a tight affair. However, with a 10% likelihood each for a 1-0 win to either side, the margins couldn’t be slimmer. Yet, the expected goals tell a story of nearly equal firepower, suggesting that the battle could hinge on defensive resilience.

    With a 46% chance for over 2.5 goals and both teams likely to score at 52%, one might expect some goalmouth action. However, the real betting intrigue lies elsewhere. Under 2.5 goals presents itself as a tantalizing prospect, with Pinnacle offering odds of 1.97 — a 6% edge over the model's own assessment. For those with a penchant for the away side, FC Annecy's odds of 2.65 offer potential, though the edge there is a knife's whisper at best. If there's value to be had, it’s with a disciplined scoreline, banking on defences holding firm rather than crumbling under pressure.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Pau 1Draw 0Annecy 1
    Goals: 12 (⌀ 1,5)

    Head-to-head based on Ligue 2 data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Pau
    Annecy
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Annecy (4737)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Annecy
    Ahmed Kashi: 193 passningar, xT 0.26KashiTriston Tye Rowe: 162 passningar, xT 0.98RoweFrançois Lajugie: 161 passningar, xT 0.29LajugieAxel Drouhin: 153 passningar, xT 0.23DrouhinFlorian Escales: 133 passningar, xT 0.16EscalesAlexis Casadei: 93 passningar, xT 0.07CasadeiJulien Kouadio: 92 passningar, xT 0.17KouadioClément Billemaz: 77 passningar, xT 0.39BillemazAntoine Larose: 60 passningar, xT 0.29LaroseThibault Rambaud: 59 passningar, xT 0.19RambaudValentin Jacob: 48 passningar, xT -0.03Jacob
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Annecy
    Ahmed Kashi: 193 passningar, xT 0.26KashiTriston Tye Rowe: 162 passningar, xT 0.98RoweFrançois Lajugie: 161 passningar, xT 0.29LajugieAxel Drouhin: 153 passningar, xT 0.23DrouhinFlorian Escales: 133 passningar, xT 0.16EscalesAlexis Casadei: 93 passningar, xT 0.07CasadeiJulien Kouadio: 92 passningar, xT 0.17KouadioClément Billemaz: 77 passningar, xT 0.39BillemazAntoine Larose: 60 passningar, xT 0.29LaroseThibault Rambaud: 59 passningar, xT 0.19RambaudValentin Jacob: 48 passningar, xT -0.03Jacob

    The teams in numbers

    PerformancePauAnnecy
    Points4551
    xPoints45.751.8
    xG per match1.21.2
    xGA per match1.20.98
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.20.21
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.20.12
    Playing stylePauAnnecy
    Build-up efficiency0.340.28
    Field tilt0.520.51
    xT per match10.81
    xTA per match10.73
    Won balls, offensive half1932
    Pressing intensity0.220.2
    Pressing efficiency0.250.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.320.36
    Entries into the box per match1010
    Entries into the box against118
    Pass completion %0.810.68
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.66
    Passes per match395276
    Passes against per match379367
    Switches of play per match30.815.2
    Long balls per match3623
    Set piecesPauAnnecy
    xG from free kicks0.060.1
    Corners per match4.84.4
    Corners against per match4.54.1
    xG per corner0.030.07
    xGA per corner against0.050.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.45
    First touch, defensive corners %0.580.6
    OtherPauAnnecy
    Throw-in control0.730.7
    The goalkeepersPauFlorian Escales (Annecy)
    Saves49
    Save %60%
    xG prevented33%
    Claims0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Pau vs Annecy according to our model?

    The model gives Annecy a 38% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Pau 34%, draw 29%, Annecy 38%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.