Ligue 2Nouste Camp, Pau27°6 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    PauPauPossession control
    01
    AnnecyAnnecyPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Annecy (38%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 1.99 (+7 %)

    Pau vs Annecy · Ligue 2

    1 · Pau 34%X 29%38% Annecy · 2

    Analysis: PauAnnecy

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    Two matches into their recent encounters, the small sample size shows a split with each team claiming a victory. However, FC Annecy strides into this fixture with a slight edge, both in current points (51 vs. Pau FC's 45) and in expected points (51.8 vs. 45.7), suggesting a more consistent performance across the season. The model tips the scales slightly in Annecy’s favor with a 38% chance of victory, compared to Pau FC’s 34%. Though the numbers might be close, they whisper an away win.

    Pau FC's expected goals (xG) tally is narrowly higher at 1.25 compared to Annecy’s 1.28, yet it's FC Annecy’s defensive solidity that distinguishes them, boasting an xGA of 0.98 to Pau’s 1.2. This defensive edge might prove critical in a match where both teams employ a possession-control style, suggesting a tightly contested midfield battle that could suppress goal-scoring opportunities.

    Weather conditions remain unspecified, so no external factors seem likely to influence this match beyond the teams’ strategies and recent form. The probability of over 2.5 goals stands at 46%, while both teams scoring is slightly higher at 52%, hinting at a cautious affair that could potentially see both teams find the net.

    Most likely scorelines suggest a 1-1 draw at 13%, but the potential for a narrow 0-1 away win at 10% aligns with the model’s lean towards FC Annecy. Notably, the betting markets present value under 2.5 goals at odds of 1.98 with Pinnacle, where the model sees a 6% edge, reflecting the likelihood of a low-scoring encounter. Similarly, an Annecy victory at 2.65 is pegged at no edge, but given the model’s preference, it may be a punt worth considering for those backing the away side’s momentum.

    PauPau
    Form DDWLL
    League ranking xG #8xGA #11xT #5xP/match #9Points #9
    Key players
    • Anthony BriançonCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.09
    • Rayan TouzgharCAMxG 0.21 · xT 0.08
    • Daylam MeddahCBxG 0.05 · xT 0.07
    AnnecyAnnecy
    Form DWWWL
    League ranking xG #10xGA #4xT #12xP/match #4Points #7
    Key players
    • Clément BillemazLWxG 0.07 · xT 0.16
    • Thibault RambaudFxG 0.30 · xT 0.07
    • Ben Hamed TouréFxG 0.34 · xT 0.12
    Final score
    01
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Pau 34% · Draw 29% · Annecy 38%

    Match prediction: PauAnnecy

    Predicted score matrix

    Annecy
    Pau
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.3%
    0–19.9%
    0–26.6%
    0–32.8%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–09.6%
    1–113.1%
    1–28.2%
    1–33.5%
    1–4+1.5%
    2
    2–06.2%
    2–17.9%
    2–25.1%
    2–32.2%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.3%
    3–22.1%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.3%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-110%
    3. 3.1-010%
    4. 4.0-08%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,251,28
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,554%
    @1.99EV+7%
    Over 2,546%
    @1.86

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Annecy or draw (X2)65%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    49%

    Fair odds

    2.05

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Annecy or draw (X2)65%
    • Under 2.5 goals54%
    • Thibault Rambaud to score24%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals46%
    • Thibault Rambaud to score24%
    • Steeve Beusnard to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.554% probability@1.99PinnacleEV+7%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · PauX2 · Annecy
    Pinnacle2.703.412.64

    Odds updated 8 Aug, 10:09

    Odds movement

    1+4 %
    38 %33 %

    2.602.70

    X+1 %
    31 %26 %

    3.373.41

    20 %
    38 %33 %

    2.652.64

    Over 2,5+1 %
    54 %49 %

    1.841.86

    Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 04/08/2026 → 08/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Pau 1Draw 0Annecy 1
    Goals: 12 (⌀ 1,5)

    Head-to-head based on Ligue 2 data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Pau
    Annecy
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Annecy (4737)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Annecy
    Ahmed Kashi: 193 passningar, xT 0.26KashiTriston Tye Rowe: 162 passningar, xT 0.98RoweFrançois Lajugie: 161 passningar, xT 0.29LajugieAxel Drouhin: 153 passningar, xT 0.23DrouhinFlorian Escales: 133 passningar, xT 0.16EscalesAlexis Casadei: 93 passningar, xT 0.07CasadeiJulien Kouadio: 92 passningar, xT 0.17KouadioClément Billemaz: 77 passningar, xT 0.39BillemazAntoine Larose: 60 passningar, xT 0.29LaroseThibault Rambaud: 59 passningar, xT 0.19RambaudValentin Jacob: 48 passningar, xT -0.03Jacob
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Annecy
    Ahmed Kashi: 193 passningar, xT 0.26KashiTriston Tye Rowe: 162 passningar, xT 0.98RoweFrançois Lajugie: 161 passningar, xT 0.29LajugieAxel Drouhin: 153 passningar, xT 0.23DrouhinFlorian Escales: 133 passningar, xT 0.16EscalesAlexis Casadei: 93 passningar, xT 0.07CasadeiJulien Kouadio: 92 passningar, xT 0.17KouadioClément Billemaz: 77 passningar, xT 0.39BillemazAntoine Larose: 60 passningar, xT 0.29LaroseThibault Rambaud: 59 passningar, xT 0.19RambaudValentin Jacob: 48 passningar, xT -0.03Jacob

    The teams in numbers

    PerformancePauAnnecy
    Points4551
    xPoints45.751.8
    xG per match1.21.2
    xGA per match1.20.98
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.20.21
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.20.12
    Playing stylePauAnnecy
    Build-up efficiency0.340.28
    Field tilt0.520.51
    xT per match10.81
    xTA per match10.73
    Won balls, offensive half1932
    Pressing intensity0.220.2
    Pressing efficiency0.250.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.320.36
    Entries into the box per match1010
    Entries into the box against118
    Pass completion %0.810.68
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.66
    Passes per match395276
    Passes against per match379367
    Switches of play per match30.815.2
    Long balls per match3623
    Set piecesPauAnnecy
    xG from free kicks0.060.1
    Corners per match4.84.4
    Corners against per match4.54.1
    xG per corner0.030.07
    xGA per corner against0.050.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.45
    First touch, defensive corners %0.580.6
    OtherPauAnnecy
    Throw-in control0.730.7
    The goalkeepersPauFlorian Escales (Annecy)
    Saves49
    Save %60%
    xG prevented33%
    Claims0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Pau vs Annecy according to our model?

    The model gives Annecy a 38% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Pau 34%, draw 29%, Annecy 38%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.