3. Liga

    Läs på svenska
    GR
    GrossaspachPossession & high press
    vs
    Waldhof MannheimWaldhof MannheimCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Grossaspach (42%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.40 (+11 %)

    Grossaspach vs Waldhof Mannheim · 3. Liga

    1 · Grossaspach 42%X 25%33% Waldhof Mannheim · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Grossaspach – Waldhof Mannheim

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The head-to-head record between Grossaspach and Waldhof Mannheim is sparse, offering little historical insight into their upcoming clash. Instead, we focus on their current form and statistical profiles. Both teams have started the season with similar trajectories, with Mannheim slightly ahead in the points table. However, the underlying numbers suggest Grossaspach may have the edge; their expected points (10.1) are closely trailing Mannheim's (10.5).

    Grossaspach's playing style, characterized by possession and a high press, could prove effective against Mannheim's preference for counter-attacks and crosses. The possession game might allow the hosts to dictate the tempo, while their higher xG per match (1.7) points to a team capable of creating more scoring opportunities. Yet, this offensive potential is balanced by defensive vulnerabilities, as their xGA per match (1.6) indicates.

    Mannheim's defensive solidity, reflected in their lower xGA of 1.1, could be key in a tightly contested match. Their ability to absorb pressure and hit on the break could unsettle Grossaspach's plans. Nevertheless, Grossaspach's defensive frailties might be somewhat mitigated by the game plan that seeks to control the ball and limit Mannheim's transitions.

    Given the edge in possession and attacking metrics, Grossaspach appears to have a slight advantage, aligning with the model's probabilities that favor them at 42%. The most likely scoreline is 1-1, but a narrow 2-1 win for the hosts is plausible. The over 2.5 goals market is favored at 54%, but the matchup hints at a more controlled affair. Value seekers can note the 2-1 scoreline, a 9% probability, as a potentially rewarding avenue, especially if the odds reflect the model's lean towards Grossaspach.

    Grossaspach
    Form LWDDL
    League ranking xG #8xGA #15xT #2xP/match #10Points #14
    Key players
    • Marlon Freddy FaßFxG 0.46 · xT -0.01
    • Niklas PollexFxG 0.16 · xT 0.32
    • Fabian EiseleFxG 0.70 · xT 0.02
    Waldhof MannheimWaldhof Mannheim
    Form LLWLW
    League ranking xG #12xGA #5xT #4xP/match #8Points #8
    Key players
    • Lovis BierschenkLWxG 0.32 · xT 0.24
    • Favour Jidechi OkekeRBxG 0.03 · xT 0.28
    • Julian UlbrichtLWxG 0.41 · xT 0.00

    Match prediction: Grossaspach – Waldhof Mannheim

    Predicted score matrix

    Waldhof Mannheim →
    Grossaspach →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.3%
    0–17.7%
    0–25.5%
    0–32.5%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–08.3%
    1–112.2%
    1–28.0%
    1–33.6%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–06.4%
    2–18.7%
    2–25.9%
    2–32.7%
    2–4+1.2%
    3
    3–03.1%
    3–14.2%
    3–22.9%
    3–31.3%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–01.6%
    4+–12.2%
    4+–21.5%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-08%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.0-18%
    Expected goals
    1,47–1,36
    Both teams to score
    58%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,546%
    @2.40EV+11%
    Over 2,554%
    @1.50

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Grossaspach or draw (1X)65%
    • Over 1.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.97

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Grossaspach or draw (1X)65%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Tim Rossmann to score24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score58%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Tim Rossmann to score24%
    • Claudio Matthias Kammerknecht to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.546% probability@2.40BetsafeEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 2.546% probability@2.40NordicbetEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 3.569% probability@1.58BetsafeEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · GrossaspachX2 · Waldhof Mannheim
    Betfair Exchange1.121.131.12
    Betsafe
    EV+ 1%
    2.38
    3.452.62
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 1%
    2.38
    3.452.62

    Odds updated 2 Oct, 07:36

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Grossaspach
    Waldhof Mannheim
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Grossaspach (6–9)
    Waldhof Mannheim (11–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Grossaspach
    Marius Kunde: 200 passningar, xT 0.72KundeLuca Damiano Molinari: 196 passningar, xT 1.48MolinariJan Elias Rahn: 178 passningar, xT 0.75RahnAntonis Aidonis: 172 passningar, xT 0.92AidonisVolkan Celiktas: 160 passningar, xT 0.48CeliktasLoris Maier: 157 passningar, xT 0.2MaierMaximilian Reule: 142 passningar, xT 0.25ReuleArbnor Nuraj: 139 passningar, xT 0.3NurajNiklas Pollex: 96 passningar, xT 1.45PollexChristian Mistl: 83 passningar, xT 0.23MistlTim Rossmann: 77 passningar, xT 0.39Rossmann
    Waldhof Mannheim
    Claudio Matthias Kammerknecht: 282 passningar, xT 0.69KammerknechtFavour Jidechi Okeke: 177 passningar, xT 0.83OkekeOwono-Darnell Keumo: 174 passningar, xT 1.32KeumoThijmen Joel Sander Nijhuis: 168 passningar, xT 0.24NijhuisJulian Rieckmann: 158 passningar, xT 0.61RieckmannLukas Klunter: 140 passningar, xT 0.33KlunterDiego Michel: 131 passningar, xT 0.63MichelVincent Thill: 107 passningar, xT 0.15ThillJoey Paul Müller: 106 passningar, xT -0.04MüllerLovis Bierschenk: 94 passningar, xT 0.83BierschenkGonçalo de Almeida Gregório: 87 passningar, xT -0.16Gregório
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Grossaspach
    Marius Kunde: 200 passningar, xT 0.72KundeLuca Damiano Molinari: 196 passningar, xT 1.48MolinariJan Elias Rahn: 178 passningar, xT 0.75RahnAntonis Aidonis: 172 passningar, xT 0.92AidonisVolkan Celiktas: 160 passningar, xT 0.48CeliktasLoris Maier: 157 passningar, xT 0.2MaierMaximilian Reule: 142 passningar, xT 0.25ReuleArbnor Nuraj: 139 passningar, xT 0.3NurajNiklas Pollex: 96 passningar, xT 1.45PollexChristian Mistl: 83 passningar, xT 0.23MistlTim Rossmann: 77 passningar, xT 0.39Rossmann
    Waldhof Mannheim
    Claudio Matthias Kammerknecht: 282 passningar, xT 0.69KammerknechtFavour Jidechi Okeke: 177 passningar, xT 0.83OkekeOwono-Darnell Keumo: 174 passningar, xT 1.32KeumoThijmen Joel Sander Nijhuis: 168 passningar, xT 0.24NijhuisJulian Rieckmann: 158 passningar, xT 0.61RieckmannLukas Klunter: 140 passningar, xT 0.33KlunterDiego Michel: 131 passningar, xT 0.63MichelVincent Thill: 107 passningar, xT 0.15ThillJoey Paul Müller: 106 passningar, xT -0.04MüllerLovis Bierschenk: 94 passningar, xT 0.83BierschenkGonçalo de Almeida Gregório: 87 passningar, xT -0.16Gregório

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGrossaspachWaldhof Mannheim
    Points810
    xPoints10.110.5
    xG per match1.71.4
    xGA per match1.61.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.230.17
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.20.17
    Playing styleGrossaspachWaldhof Mannheim
    Build-up efficiency0.340.32
    Field tilt0.640.54
    xT per match1.61.3
    xTA per match1.20.98
    Won balls, offensive half3222
    Pressing intensity0.230.21
    Pressing efficiency0.330.35
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.3
    Entries into the box per match2016
    Entries into the box against1513
    Pass completion %0.740.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.680.73
    Passes per match362345
    Passes against per match318317
    Switches of play per match19.527.1
    Long balls per match3339
    Set piecesGrossaspachWaldhof Mannheim
    xG from free kicks0.040.03
    Corners per match64.2
    Corners against per match5.64.5
    xG per corner0.030.01
    xGA per corner against0.040.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.360.55
    First touch, defensive corners %0.540.61
    OtherGrossaspachWaldhof Mannheim
    Throw-in control0.70.72
    The goalkeepersMaximilian Reule (Grossaspach)Thijmen Joel Sander Nijhuis (Waldhof Mannheim)
    Saves2617
    Save %77%74%
    xG prevented76%69%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Grossaspach vs Waldhof Mannheim according to our model?

    The model gives Grossaspach a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Grossaspach 42%, draw 25%, Waldhof Mannheim 33%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.