01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Waldhof Mannheim to win47%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
3. Liga
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
FAKTA: Model probabilities: Havelse 27%, draw 27%, Waldhof Mannheim 47%. Model lean: Waldhof Mannheim. Most likely scorelines: 1-2 (10%), 1-1 (10%), 0-2 (8%). Expected goals: Havelse 1.22, Waldhof Mannheim 2.09. Over 2.5 goals: 64%. Both teams to score: 62%. Playing style: Havelse profiles as counter attack & crosses, Waldhof Mannheim as counter attack & crosses. Havelse have lost 3 in a row. Head-to-head since 2024: 2 matches, Havelse 0W 0D 2L. Points: Havelse 0 vs Waldhof Mannheim 4 (edge Waldhof Mannheim) xPoints: Havelse 2.2 vs Waldhof Mannheim 3.5 (edge Waldhof Mannheim) xG per match: Havelse 0.85 vs Waldhof Mannheim 1.7 (edge Waldhof Mannheim) xGA per match: Havelse 2.3 vs Waldhof Mannheim 1.4 (edge Waldhof Mannheim)
TEXT: Havelse's matchup against Waldhof Mannheim is poised to showcase a clear disparity in form and underlying metrics. The hosts have endured a troubling streak, losing their last three matches, which overshadows any potential home advantage. Meanwhile, the visitors enter with confidence, having collected four points from their opening matches, bolstered by two head-to-head victories against Havelse, albeit from a small sample size.
The expected goals tell a revealing story: Havelse averages just 0.85 xG per match, while conceding a concerning 2.3 xGA. In stark contrast, Mannheim demonstrates a more robust 1.7 xG and a tighter defense at 1.4 xGA. These figures suggest a game where the visitors are likely to control proceedings, particularly as both sides favor counter-attacking and crossing strategies, potentially neutralizing Havelse's approach while exploiting their defensive lapses.
The model leans heavily towards Mannheim, giving them a 47% chance of victory with a most likely scoreline of 1-2. This aligns with the expected goals metrics projecting Mannheim to score over twice. The over 2.5 goals probability sits at 64%, a strong indicator of an open game with multiple scoring chances. Given both teams' propensity to concede, the 62% likelihood of both teams scoring seems plausible, though the visitors' superior form suggests they'll have the upper hand.
From a betting perspective, the combination of Havelse's struggles, Mannheim's form, and the statistical backing makes the visitors an attractive option. The game points towards a 1-2 victory for Mannheim, aligning with their attacking prowess and defensive solidity relative to Havelse's vulnerabilities.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Havelse | X | 2 · Waldhof Mannheim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paddy Power | EV+ 21% 4.50 | EV+ 17% 4.40 | 1.53 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 2% 3.82 | EV+ 15% 4.32 | 1.77 |
Odds updated 30 Aug, 06:31
3.64 → 3.82
4.13 → 4.32
1.79 → 1.77
Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 30/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on 3. Liga data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Havelse | Waldhof Mannheim |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 4 |
| xPoints | 2.2 | 3.5 |
| xG per match | 0.85 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0 | 0.2 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.39 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Havelse | Waldhof Mannheim |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| xT per match | 0.62 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 20 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 20 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 244 | 241 |
| Passes against per match | 385 | 379 |
| Switches of play per match | 11.2 | 22.7 |
| Long balls per match | 23 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Havelse | Waldhof Mannheim |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 4.6 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 7.6 | 4.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| Other | Havelse | Waldhof Mannheim |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| The goalkeepers | Omer Hanin (Havelse) | Jan Niemann (Waldhof Mannheim) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 5 |
| Save % | 75% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 60% | 51% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Waldhof Mannheim a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Havelse 27%, draw 27%, Waldhof Mannheim 47%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-2 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 64% and under at 36%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.