01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Havelse or draw (1X)67%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
3. Liga
Läs på svenskaFinal score 2–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Havelse vs Wurzburger Kickers (3. Liga, Tuesday, 13 October 2026): Havelse win 39%, draw 24%, Wurzburger Kickers win 37%. Expected goals (xG): Havelse 1.49, Wurzburger Kickers 1.30. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 53%, both teams to score 57%. Double chance: Havelse or draw 63%, Wurzburger Kickers or draw 61%. Prediction updated Monday, 5 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The tactical duel between Havelse's counter-attacks and crosses against Wurzburger Kickers' possession control sets the stage for a fascinating clash. Havelse’s approach is tailored for exploiting spaces left by opponents that commit forward, perfect for countering the visitors' style. Their strategy could see them occasionally pinning back the Kickers, who typically excel at dictating the tempo but might find it challenging to break down a well-drilled defensive unit on the break.
The model shows a slight lean towards Havelse, rating their winning chances at 39%. This narrow margin highlights the tight nature of this matchup. While the Kickers have a better points tally (7) compared to Havelse (4), Havelse’s expected points (8.0) suggest they’ve been somewhat unlucky not to have more to show for their efforts. The statistical edge lies with the visitors, who have superior xPoints (10.2) and xG per match (1.4 to Havelse's 0.95).
With expected goals suggesting Havelse 1.49 and the visitors 1.30, the likelihood of a closely contested scoreline is high. The most probable outcomes, a 1-1 draw or a narrow 2-1 victory for Havelse, underline the potential for a tight game. Although the over 2.5 goals probability stands at 53%, indicating a slight leaning towards more goals, the suppressed xG figures paint a picture of a match that could be equally likely to end under the line.
Betsafe and Nordicbet offer an attractive EV+ value on the home win at odds of 2.75. With the model rating them at 39%, this presents an 8% edge. Further value can be found in the under 2.5 goals line at 2.28 with Betsafe, which offers a 7% edge as the model rates this at 47%. As these teams prepare to clash, betting angles favor the underdog hosts to carve out a result against the possession-oriented Kickers, in a game that may not see a flurry of goals.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Havelse | X | 2 · Wurzburger Kickers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 4% 2.65 | 3.45 | 2.32 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 4% 2.65 | 3.50 | 2.30 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 4% 2.65 | 3.45 | 2.32 |
| Paddy Power | EV+ 3% 2.63 | 3.60 | 2.20 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 8% 2.76 | 3.88 | 2.30 |
Odds updated 13 Oct, 13:36
2.72 → 2.76
3.85 → 3.88
2.25 → 2.30
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 10/10/2026 → 13/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Havelse | Wurzburger Kickers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 7 |
| xPoints | 8 | 10.2 |
| xG per match | 0.95 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.03 | 0.27 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Playing style | Havelse | Wurzburger Kickers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.37 |
| Field tilt | 0.3 | 0.39 |
| xT per match | 0.81 | 0.89 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 9 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.62 |
| Passes per match | 282 | 269 |
| Passes against per match | 389 | 390 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Havelse | Wurzburger Kickers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.1 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.36 | 0.35 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.54 | 0.64 |
| Other | Havelse | Wurzburger Kickers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Omer Hanin (Havelse) | Marko Rajkovačić (Wurzburger Kickers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 23 | 17 |
| Save % | 70% | 68% |
| xG prevented | 53% | 53% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Havelse a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Havelse 39%, draw 24%, Wurzburger Kickers 37%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The model expects 1.49 goals (xG) for Havelse and 1.30 for Wurzburger Kickers, 2.79 in total.
Havelse or draw (1X) 63%, Wurzburger Kickers or draw (X2) 61% and no draw (12) 76%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.