01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Duisburg to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
3. Liga16°0,1 mm14 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
With Duisburg given a 48% probability to triumph over Wehen Wiesbaden, the model leans decisively towards the visitors. This clash is framed by contrasting playing styles: Wiesbaden's possession-heavy, high-press approach against Duisburg's low defensive block and direct counterattacks. Despite the small sample size of their head-to-head record, Duisburg's superior form this season, reflected in both points and expected points, adds weight to this prediction.
Wiesbaden, though eager to control possession, has collected just 2 points so far, struggling to convert their 1.26 expected goals per game into actual victories. Duisburg, meanwhile, not only boasts a higher xG of 2.0 per match but also a rock-solid defense, conceding a mere 0.85 xGA on average. With a 53% chance for over 2.5 goals and 57% for both teams to score, the match may well see scoring opportunities on both ends.
In betting terms, Duisburg presents a value proposition with their odds at 2.12 on Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, offering a 3% edge over the model's estimated probability. A 1-2 result seems plausible, aligning with the most likely scorelines—emphasizing the visitors' potential to exploit Wiesbaden's leaky defense.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Wehen Wiesbaden | X | 2 · Duisburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.05 | 3.35 | EV+ 4% 2.15 |
| Betsson | 3.05 | 3.35 | EV+ 4% 2.15 |
| Nordicbet | 3.05 | 3.35 | EV+ 4% 2.15 |
| Paddy Power | 3.10 | 3.60 | 1.95 |
| Pinnacle | 3.06 | 3.44 | EV+ 7% 2.21 |
Odds updated 19 Sept, 10:20
3.09 → 3.06
3.44 → 3.44
2.19 → 2.21
1.79 → 1.81
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 17/09/2026 → 19/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on 3. Liga data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Wehen Wiesbaden | Duisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 2 | 15 |
| xPoints | 5.4 | 12.7 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 2 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 0.85 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.28 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | Wehen Wiesbaden | Duisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.61 | 0.5 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.76 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.19 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 344 | 328 |
| Passes against per match | 312 | 372 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.4 | 22.2 |
| Long balls per match | 36 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Wehen Wiesbaden | Duisburg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 5.4 | 6.8 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 3.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.53 |
| Other | Wehen Wiesbaden | Duisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Florian Stritzel (Wehen Wiesbaden) | Maximilian Braune (Duisburg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 13 | 12 |
| Save % | 59% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 19% | 55% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Duisburg a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Wehen Wiesbaden 28%, draw 24%, Duisburg 48%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.