01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Viktoria Köln to win46%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
3. Liga15°13,8 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
With Viktoria Köln holding a 46% win probability against Ingolstadt's 28%, the numbers lean towards the hosts. The edge in possession control should allow Viktoria Köln to dictate the rhythm. Their expected goals tally of 1.69 surpasses the visitors' 1.43, suggesting a slight upper hand in potential scoring opportunities. Historically, the head-to-head record is small and mixed, with Viktoria Köln leading with two wins out of four matches since 2024, but it's their form and expected goals that offer more insight.
The expected goals data indicates a likely Viktoria Köln advantage in what could be a controlled yet competitive match. Although Ingolstadt's xPoints are marginally higher at 6.1 compared to Köln's 5.7, this discrepancy isn't enough to shift the model's preference. Both teams emphasize possession, which could maintain a tight midfield battle. However, the model's lean towards over 2.5 goals at 60% and both teams to score at 62% suggests that while controlled, the match might still see its share of goals.
Bettors might find an edge if bookmakers' odds on both teams scoring exceed what current numbers imply. Still, with the model's indicators pointing to a possible 2-1 win for Viktoria Köln, aligning bets with their win probability might be the prudent play.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on 3. Liga data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Viktoria Köln | Ingolstadt |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 5 |
| xPoints | 5.7 | 6.1 |
| xG per match | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.2 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Viktoria Köln | Ingolstadt |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.26 |
| xT per match | 0.72 | 0.84 |
| xTA per match | 0.72 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.19 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.82 | 0.68 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.78 | 0.68 |
| Passes per match | 478 | 256 |
| Passes against per match | 298 | 402 |
| Switches of play per match | 15 | 18.7 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 35 |
| Set pieces | Viktoria Köln | Ingolstadt |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 5 | 2.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.8 | 7.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.57 |
| Other | Viktoria Köln | Ingolstadt |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.65 |
| The goalkeepers | Arne Schulz (Viktoria Köln) | David Klein (Ingolstadt) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 15 |
| Save % | 43% | 71% |
| xG prevented | 33% | 47% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Viktoria Köln a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Viktoria Köln 46%, draw 26%, Ingolstadt 28%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.