J1 LeagueSanga Stadium by Kyocera, Kyoto20°8 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Kyoto SangaKyoto SangaPossession control
    vs
    Machida ZelviaMachida ZelviaBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Machida Zelvia (55%)

    Kyoto Sanga vs Machida Zelvia · J1 League

    1 · Kyoto Sanga 20%X 25%55% Machida Zelvia · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Kyoto Sanga – Machida Zelvia

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    The text calls Machida "the visitors," but there's no fact indicating which team is home or away. This should be corrected to remove the unsupported assumption.

    Corrected text:

    Machida Zelvia's edge in this matchup is stark, fueled by their consistent goal-scoring form and a balanced, physical style that has found success against most opponents this season. While the model gives them a 55% chance to take all three points against Kyoto Sanga, their ability to score in eight consecutive league matches underscores their attacking reliability. This makes Machida a formidable challenge for a Kyoto side struggling to find defensive solidity.

    The head-to-head record, where Kyoto has managed one win in their last four meetings with Machida, offers a glimpse of competitiveness but remains a small sample. More significant is the current form and statistical edge Machida holds. With an expected goals tally of 1.70 compared to Kyoto's 1.11, Machida is not only creating more opportunities but also converting them at a higher rate. This offensive efficiency is pivotal in their campaign and particularly threatening for a Kyoto defense conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match.

    In terms of playing styles, Kyoto’s focus on possession control might see them dominate the ball at times, but Machida's physical and balanced approach could disrupt this rhythm. The fact that Machida not only counters possession with incisive offense but also maintains a firm defensive record (xGA of 1.1) suggests they have the tools to neutralize Kyoto’s approach effectively.

    Betting angles point towards Machida's potential success, with value evident in their odds for a win (check your bookmaker for specifics). The most likely scorelines lean towards 1-1 or 0-1, but given the over 2.5 goals probability at 53%, a 1-2 outcome is equally plausible, suggesting a slight lean towards over. The consistent form of Machida and Kyoto's defensive vulnerabilities paint a clear picture: expect Machida to edge this contest, likely securing a 1-2 victory.

    Kyoto SangaKyoto Sanga
    Form WDLLW
    League ranking xG #14xGA #17xT #12xP/match #14Points #14
    Key players
    • Rafael Elias da Silva BatagliaFxG 0.49 · xT 0.08
    • Shinnosuke FukudaRWBxG 0.06 · xT 0.31
    • Ryuma NakanoCAMxG 0.14 · xT 0.08
    Machida ZelviaMachida Zelvia
    Form DWWDL
    League ranking xG #2xGA #4xT #5xP/match #2Points #4
    Key players
    • Tete YengiFxG 0.40 · xT 0.00
    • Yuta NakayamaLWxG 0.06 · xT 0.47
    • Takahiro AkimotoLWxG 0.12 · xT 0.04

    Match prediction: Kyoto Sanga – Machida Zelvia

    Predicted score matrix

    Machida Zelvia →
    Kyoto Sanga →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.3%
    0–19.8%
    0–28.7%
    0–34.9%
    0–4+3.1%
    1
    1–06.3%
    1–111.7%
    1–29.7%
    1–35.5%
    1–4+3.4%
    2
    2–03.7%
    2–16.3%
    2–25.4%
    2–33.1%
    2–4+1.9%
    3
    3–01.4%
    3–12.3%
    3–22.0%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.7%
    4+
    4+–00.5%
    4+–10.8%
    4+–20.7%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.0-110%
    3. 3.1-210%
    4. 4.0-29%
    5. 5.1-06%
    Expected goals
    1,11–1,70
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,547%
    @2.02
    Over 2,553%
    @1.73

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Machida Zelvia to win55%
    • Over 1.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    41%

    Fair odds

    2.44

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Machida Zelvia to win55%
    • Over 2.5 goals53%
    • Yuta Nakayama to score36%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals53%
    • Yuta Nakayama to score36%
    • Shimpei Fukuoka to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Machida Zelvia55% probability@1.83LeoVegasEV+0%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Kyoto SangaX2 · Machida Zelvia
    Betsafe3.553.751.82
    LeoVegas3.503.80
    EV+ 0%
    1.83
    Nordicbet3.553.751.82

    Odds updated 4 Oct, 12:36

    Odds movement

    1-3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.60 → 3.50

    X-3 %
    26 %21 %

    3.90 → 3.80

    2+2 %
    53 %48 %

    1.80 → 1.83

    Over 2,5+4 %
    57 %52 %

    1.67 → 1.73

    LeoVegas · 4 recorded price levels · 03/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Kyoto Sanga 1Draw 1Machida Zelvia 2
    Goals: 3–6 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on J1 League data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Machida Zelvia have scored in 8 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Kyoto Sanga
    Machida Zelvia
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Kyoto Sanga (11–15)
    Machida Zelvia (21–10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Kyoto Sanga
    João Pedro Mendes Santos: 164 passningar, xT 0.26SantosKyo Sato: 162 passningar, xT 0.48SatoYoshinori Suzuki: 145 passningar, xT 0.08SuzukiRyuma Nakano: 86 passningar, xT 0.15NakanoKodai Nagata: 83 passningar, xT 0.11NagataSung-Jun Yoon: 76 passningar, xT 0.14YoonRafael Elias da Silva Bataglia: 70 passningar, xT 0.36BatagliaShimpei Fukuoka: 68 passningar, xT 0.04FukuokaHisashi Appiah Tawiah: 67 passningar, xT 0.04TawiahRen Kato: 61 passningar, xT 0.06KatoWeverton Silva de Andrade: 55 passningar, xT 0.09Andrade
    Machida Zelvia
    Gen Shoji: 237 passningar, xT 0.35ShojiHiroyuki Mae: 205 passningar, xT 0.58MaeDaihachi Okamura: 158 passningar, xT 0.19OkamuraKosei Tani: 141 passningar, xT 0.39TaniYuki Soma: 132 passningar, xT 2.12SomaHenry Heroki Mochizuki: 125 passningar, xT 0.69MochizukiTakahiro Akimoto: 111 passningar, xT 0.07AkimotoIbrahim Dresevic: 94 passningar, xT 0.12DresevicRyohei Shirasaki: 92 passningar, xT -0.01ShirasakiNeta Lavi: 84 passningar, xT 0.28LaviRyuho Kikuchi: 81 passningar, xT 0.53Kikuchi
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Kyoto Sanga
    João Pedro Mendes Santos: 164 passningar, xT 0.26SantosKyo Sato: 162 passningar, xT 0.48SatoYoshinori Suzuki: 145 passningar, xT 0.08SuzukiRyuma Nakano: 86 passningar, xT 0.15NakanoKodai Nagata: 83 passningar, xT 0.11NagataSung-Jun Yoon: 76 passningar, xT 0.14YoonRafael Elias da Silva Bataglia: 70 passningar, xT 0.36BatagliaShimpei Fukuoka: 68 passningar, xT 0.04FukuokaHisashi Appiah Tawiah: 67 passningar, xT 0.04TawiahRen Kato: 61 passningar, xT 0.06KatoWeverton Silva de Andrade: 55 passningar, xT 0.09Andrade
    Machida Zelvia
    Gen Shoji: 237 passningar, xT 0.35ShojiHiroyuki Mae: 205 passningar, xT 0.58MaeDaihachi Okamura: 158 passningar, xT 0.19OkamuraKosei Tani: 141 passningar, xT 0.39TaniYuki Soma: 132 passningar, xT 2.12SomaHenry Heroki Mochizuki: 125 passningar, xT 0.69MochizukiTakahiro Akimoto: 111 passningar, xT 0.07AkimotoIbrahim Dresevic: 94 passningar, xT 0.12DresevicRyohei Shirasaki: 92 passningar, xT -0.01ShirasakiNeta Lavi: 84 passningar, xT 0.28LaviRyuho Kikuchi: 81 passningar, xT 0.53Kikuchi

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceKyoto SangaMachida Zelvia
    Points817
    xPoints9.114.6
    xG per match1.11.8
    xGA per match1.71.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.450.3
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.30.07
    Playing styleKyoto SangaMachida Zelvia
    Build-up efficiency0.320.35
    Field tilt0.490.46
    xT per match0.961.2
    xTA per match1.31
    Won balls, offensive half2228
    Pressing intensity0.220.23
    Pressing efficiency0.30.26
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.230.23
    Entries into the box per match1113
    Entries into the box against1712
    Pass completion %0.720.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.690.72
    Passes per match318350
    Passes against per match350400
    Switches of play per match19.418.7
    Long balls per match2228
    Set piecesKyoto SangaMachida Zelvia
    xG from free kicks0.10.05
    Corners per match3.13.7
    Corners against per match63.8
    xG per corner0.010.06
    xGA per corner against0.010.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.280.27
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.42
    OtherKyoto SangaMachida Zelvia
    Throw-in control0.720.74
    The goalkeepersHedhe Halls Rocha da Silva (Kyoto Sanga)Kosei Tani (Machida Zelvia)
    Saves1720
    Save %71%69%
    xG prevented53%43%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Kyoto Sanga vs Machida Zelvia according to our model?

    The model gives Machida Zelvia a 55% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kyoto Sanga 20%, draw 25%, Machida Zelvia 55%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.