01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Shimizu S-Pulse or draw (X2)65%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
J1 League18°12 km/h
Läs på svenska18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The TEXT contains unsupported claims not found in the FACTS: it labels Shimizu S-Pulse as "the visitors" (home/away status is not stated in the facts) and invents a specific betting odds figure ("2.50 with Bet365") that has no basis in the provided data.
Corrected TEXT:
A narrow 39% win probability for Shimizu S-Pulse sets the stage, highlighting their slight edge over Mito Hollyhock in this matchup. The model leans towards Shimizu S-Pulse, underpinned by their superior expected goals and points metrics. A slim advantage, but an advantage nonetheless, in a contest where every detail counts.
The most likely scorelines—1-1 at 13% and 0-1 and 1-0 at 10% each—emphasize a closely fought battle, with Shimizu's counter-attack prowess and crossing ability up against Mito's balanced and physical style. Both teams are not far apart in points, but Shimizu edges ahead with slightly better xPoints and a tighter defense, conceding fewer expected goals per match.
With a 46% probability for over 2.5 goals and a 52% chance for both teams to score, the scales tip delicately towards a low-scoring affair. Despite the tight margins, the sharper bettors might find value in backing Shimizu S-Pulse to win. While no guarantee, this presents an attractive play in a match where Shimizu's marginal superiority might just tip the balance.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Mito Hollyhock | X | 2 · Shimizu S-Pulse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.65 | 3.20 | 2.45 |
| LeoVegas | 2.65 | 3.25 | 2.50 |
| Nordicbet | 2.65 | 3.20 | 2.45 |
Odds updated 4 Oct, 11:36
2.80 → 2.65
3.30 → 3.25
2.35 → 2.50
1.88 → 1.88
LeoVegas · 3 recorded price levels · 04/10/2026 → 04/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Mito Hollyhock | Shimizu S-Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 10 |
| xPoints | 10 | 11.6 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.27 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Mito Hollyhock | Shimizu S-Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.28 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 0.95 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 31 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 349 | 271 |
| Passes against per match | 489 | 401 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.7 | 22.8 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Mito Hollyhock | Shimizu S-Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 4.4 | 5.2 |
| Corners against per match | 3.8 | 6.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.32 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| Other | Mito Hollyhock | Shimizu S-Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.61 |
| The goalkeepers | Konosuke Nishikawa (Mito Hollyhock) | Togo Umeda (Shimizu S-Pulse) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 32 | 29 |
| Save % | 74% | 81% |
| xG prevented | 59% | 56% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Shimizu S-Pulse a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Mito Hollyhock 33%, draw 28%, Shimizu S-Pulse 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.