01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Montedio Yamagata or draw (1X)71%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
J2 League17°8,6 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 0–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Montedio Yamagata vs Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo (J2 League, Wednesday, 21 October 2026): Montedio Yamagata win 41%, draw 28%, Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo win 31%. Expected goals (xG): Montedio Yamagata 1.41, Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo 1.11. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 46%, both teams to score 51%. Double chance: Montedio Yamagata or draw 69%, Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo or draw 59%. Prediction updated Tuesday, 13 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Montedio Yamagata enters this clash with a slight edge, supported by model probabilities giving them a 41% chance of victory over Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo's 31%. The hosts have shown a bit more consistency this season, leading in both actual points (13 to 11) and expected points (13.7 to 11.0). Their balanced and physical playing style contrasts with the visitors’ possession control approach, setting the stage for an intriguing tactical battle.
Expected goals tilt in favor of Yamagata, 1.41 to 1.11, suggesting they might create more chances despite the visitors’ possession style. History, albeit a small sample from just two meetings, shows no clear dominance, with each side winning once. This head-to-head record should weigh less than recent form and expected goals metrics, where Yamagata has the edge.
The 1-1 draw emerges as the most likely scoreline at 13%, but don't overlook a potential 1-0 win for the hosts at 11%. With expected goals against identical at 1.2 for both teams, defenses might cancel each other out. The moderate expectation for goals is further dampened by the forecast of heavy rain, which typically suppresses scoring. This is reflected in the under 2.5 goals probability of 54%, slightly higher than the 46% for over 2.5.
While both teams to score sits at a narrow 51%, the under 2.5 goals market shows value. Betsafe and Nordicbet offer odds of 1.88 for the under, with the model suggesting a small edge at 54%. For sharper bettors, this under bet looks like a sensible play given the tactical setup and weather conditions.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Montedio Yamagata | X | 2 · Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM UK | 2.20 | 3.45 | 2.90 |
| Betsafe | 2.30 | 3.25 | 2.80 |
| LeoVegas | 2.30 | 3.20 | 2.75 |
| Nordicbet | 2.30 | 3.25 | 2.80 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 1% 2.44 | 3.52 | 2.78 |
Odds updated 21 Oct, 06:15
2.31 → 2.44
3.48 → 3.52
2.86 → 2.78
1.84 → 1.93
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 17/10/2026 → 21/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on J2 League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Montedio Yamagata | Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 13 | 11 |
| xPoints | 13.7 | 11 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 0.99 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.22 |
| Playing style | Montedio Yamagata | Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.84 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 391 | 423 |
| Passes against per match | 360 | 261 |
| Switches of play per match | 21.5 | 32.5 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 40 |
| Set pieces | Montedio Yamagata | Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 5 | 6 |
| Corners against per match | 5 | 4.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| Other | Montedio Yamagata | Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | Ryusei Sato (Montedio Yamagata) | Tomoki Tagawa (Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 38 | 26 |
| Save % | 83% | 58% |
| xG prevented | 64% | 33% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Montedio Yamagata a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Montedio Yamagata 41%, draw 28%, Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The model expects 1.41 goals (xG) for Montedio Yamagata and 1.11 for Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo, 2.52 in total.
Montedio Yamagata or draw (1X) 69%, Hokkaido Consadole Sapporo or draw (X2) 59% and no draw (12) 72%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.