01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance KFUM or draw (1X)69%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Norwegian Eliteserien9°4,5 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for KFUM vs Hamarkameratene (Norwegian Eliteserien, Saturday, 24 October 2026): KFUM win 39%, draw 30%, Hamarkameratene win 31%. Expected goals (xG): KFUM 1.49, Hamarkameratene 1.22. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 51%, both teams to score 55%. Double chance: KFUM or draw 69%, Hamarkameratene or draw 61%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT: In the recent head-to-head series between KFUM and Hamarkameratene, there's been little to separate the two sides, with each team claiming one win and sharing the spoils in three draws over five matches. This small sample size should caution against overvaluing past encounters in predicting the outcome on Sunday. Observing their current season form, KFUM holds a slight edge with 29 points to Hamarkameratene's 26, though the xPoints suggest a tighter race with both sides performing close to expectations.
The model tips KFUM with a 39% probability of winning, slightly favoring the hosts over the visitors' 31%. Expected goals further underline KFUM's slight edge, predicting 1.49 goals for them against 1.22 for Hamarkameratene. Both teams are known for their direct styles and leaky defenses, but the rainy conditions—8.8°C with 4.5 mm of rain—could dampen the attacking flow and keep scoring opportunities in check.
While the over 2.5 goals market is finely balanced at 51%, the rain and defensive vulnerabilities suggest a more conservative approach might be wise. Both teams to score sits at 55%, reflecting the likelihood of each defense capitulating at least once. The most probable scorelines hover around a narrow win or a stalemate, with a 1-1 draw (12%) being the model's top pick followed by a 1-0 win for KFUM (10%).
For bettors seeking value, the model's lean toward KFUM suggests their chances may be underappreciated relative to the probabilities given. However, caution is warranted given the damp weather, which might level the playing field more than numbers alone suggest.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Eliteserien data since 2021.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | KFUM | Hamarkameratene |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 29 | 26 |
| xPoints | 28.3 | 27.2 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.21 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | KFUM | Hamarkameratene |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Field tilt | 0.39 | 0.33 |
| xT per match | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 19 |
| Pass completion % | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 323 | 356 |
| Passes against per match | 449 | 441 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.6 | 26.4 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 37 |
| Set pieces | KFUM | Hamarkameratene |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 4.1 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.35 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.53 |
| Other | KFUM | Hamarkameratene |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Emil Ødegaard (KFUM) | Marcus Sandberg (Hamarkameratene) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 42 | 82 |
| Save % | 74% | 65% |
| xG prevented | 56% | 44% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives KFUM a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: KFUM 39%, draw 30%, Hamarkameratene 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The model expects 1.49 goals (xG) for KFUM and 1.22 for Hamarkameratene, 2.71 in total.
KFUM or draw (1X) 69%, Hamarkameratene or draw (X2) 61% and no draw (12) 70%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.