Scottish PremiershipFir Park, Motherwell11°7,0 mm21 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    MotherwellMotherwellPossession & high press
    vs
    CelticCelticPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 2 · Celtic (59%)Best value by the model: 1 · Motherwell @ 4.90 (+7 %)

    Motherwell vs Celtic · Scottish Premiership

    1 · Motherwell 22%X 19%59% Celtic · 2

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Motherwell – Celtic

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    The TEXT contains unsupported/fabricated details not present in the FACTS: specific betting odds ("1.90 odds via Bet365") and a scoreline prediction ("possibly by 2-1") that isn't among the model's most likely scorelines (1-1, 1-2, 0-2). Here's the corrected version:

    A 59% probability leans Celtic's way for their visit to Fir Park, a fixture they've historically bossed with six wins from the last seven encounters. The high 3.9 goals-per-game average in these meetings suggests Celtic's attack often finds joy against the hosts. Yet, Motherwell's current three-game losing streak and the visitors' superior points and xPoints both underscore Celtic's advantage.

    Motherwell's possession and high-press style mirrors Celtic's, but with a 1.31 to 2.06 expected goals deficit, they might struggle to capitalize on the few chances they create. The weather, with 8.4 mm of rain on the cards, could tighten things up, yet the model remains bullish on goals, leaning 65% towards over 2.5. This aligns with the 64% likelihood of both teams scoring, despite Motherwell's recent struggles.

    The model's most likely outcomes are a 1-1 or 1-2 scoreline, each at 10%. Celtic's probability edge, combined with their superior xG, suggests the market may underprice their dominance in this matchup, especially given Motherwell's current form. The sharpest angle sees the visitors taking a rain-soaked victory, with a nod to the over 2.5 goals market.

    MotherwellMotherwell
    Form DWLLL
    League ranking xG #7xGA #6xT #5xP/match #11Points #8
    Key players
    • Emmanuel LongeloLWBxG 0.11 · xT 0.31
    • Ibrahim SaidFxG 0.08 · xT 0.07
    • Lukas FadingerCDMxG 0.19 · xT 0.06
    CelticCeltic
    Form WWWWL
    League ranking xG #1xGA #1xT #1xP/match #1Points #1
    Key players
    • Camilo Andres Durán MarquezFxG 0.46 · xT 0.14
    • Hyun-Jun YangLWxG 0.44 · xT 0.07
    • Arne EngelsCMxG 0.19 · xT 0.31

    Match prediction: Motherwell – Celtic

    Predicted score matrix

    Celtic →
    Motherwell →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–03.7%
    0–16.8%
    0–27.3%
    0–35.0%
    0–4+4.1%
    1
    1–04.2%
    1–19.6%
    1–29.5%
    1–36.5%
    1–4+5.4%
    2
    2–03.0%
    2–16.1%
    2–26.3%
    2–34.3%
    2–4+3.6%
    3
    3–01.3%
    3–12.7%
    3–22.8%
    3–31.9%
    3–4+1.6%
    4+
    4+–00.6%
    4+–11.2%
    4+–21.2%
    4+–30.8%
    4+–4+0.7%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-110%
    2. 2.1-210%
    3. 3.0-27%
    4. 4.0-17%
    5. 5.1-37%
    Expected goals
    1,31–2,06
    Both teams to score
    64%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,4
    Under 2,535%
    @2.68
    Over 2,565%
    @1.44

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Celtic to win59%
    • Over 1.5 goals85%

    Combined probability

    47%

    Fair odds

    2.11

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Celtic to win59%
    • Over 2.5 goals65%
    • Kasper Waarts Thenza Høgh to score29%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score64%
    • Over 2.5 goals65%
    • Kasper Waarts Thenza Høgh to score29%
    • Martin Moormann to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Motherwell22% probability@4.90BetsafeEV+7%reference odds
    • 1 · Motherwell22% probability@4.90NordicbetEV+7%reference odds
    • 1 · Motherwell22% probability@4.60LeoVegasEV+0%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · MotherwellX2 · Celtic
    Betsafe
    EV+ 7%
    4.90
    4.051.58
    LeoVegas
    EV+ 0%
    4.60
    4.401.55
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 7%
    4.90
    4.051.58
    Pinnacle4.444.591.62

    Odds updated 4 Oct, 13:36

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    7 matches
    Motherwell 1Draw 0Celtic 6
    Goals: 8–19 (⌀ 3,9)

    Head-to-head based on Scottish Premiership data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Celtic FC dominate this fixture historically: 6 wins to 1 in 7 meetings.
    • A high-scoring fixture: 3.9 goals per meeting on average.
    • Motherwell Football Club have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Motherwell
    Celtic
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Motherwell (9–11)
    Celtic (14–4)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Motherwell
    Martin Moormann: 370 passningar, xT 0.35MoormannLukas Fadinger: 359 passningar, xT 0.22FadingerJoseph Shaun Hodge: 346 passningar, xT 0.56HodgeJake Max Girdwood-Reich: 278 passningar, xT 0.48Girdwood-ReichTom Sparrow: 243 passningar, xT 0.65SparrowEmmanuel Longelo: 200 passningar, xT 1.25LongeloAlexander Lowry: 189 passningar, xT 0.36LowryAlexander Noah Paulsen: 188 passningar, xT 0.17PaulsenJamie Mathieu Knight-Lebel: 117 passningar, xT 0.2Knight-LebelJardell Kanga: 83 passningar, xT 0.29KangaDylan Levitt: 82 passningar, xT 0.06Levitt
    Celtic
    Liam Scales: 313 passningar, xT 0.64ScalesAuston Trusty: 310 passningar, xT 0.42TrustyCameron Robert Carter-Vickers: 274 passningar, xT 0.31Carter-VickersColby Donovan: 249 passningar, xT 0.43DonovanCallum Mcgregor: 236 passningar, xT 0.16McgregorMika Joel Baur: 188 passningar, xT 0.51BaurViljami Sinisalo: 148 passningar, xT 0.04SinisaloBenjamin Nygren: 129 passningar, xT 0.16NygrenHaissem Hassan: 102 passningar, xT 1.66HassanHyun-Jun Yang: 96 passningar, xT 0.25YangDane Murray: 84 passningar, xT 0.08Murray
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Motherwell
    Martin Moormann: 370 passningar, xT 0.35MoormannLukas Fadinger: 359 passningar, xT 0.22FadingerJoseph Shaun Hodge: 346 passningar, xT 0.56HodgeJake Max Girdwood-Reich: 278 passningar, xT 0.48Girdwood-ReichTom Sparrow: 243 passningar, xT 0.65SparrowEmmanuel Longelo: 200 passningar, xT 1.25LongeloAlexander Lowry: 189 passningar, xT 0.36LowryAlexander Noah Paulsen: 188 passningar, xT 0.17PaulsenJamie Mathieu Knight-Lebel: 117 passningar, xT 0.2Knight-LebelJardell Kanga: 83 passningar, xT 0.29KangaDylan Levitt: 82 passningar, xT 0.06Levitt
    Celtic
    Liam Scales: 313 passningar, xT 0.64ScalesAuston Trusty: 310 passningar, xT 0.42TrustyCameron Robert Carter-Vickers: 274 passningar, xT 0.31Carter-VickersColby Donovan: 249 passningar, xT 0.43DonovanCallum Mcgregor: 236 passningar, xT 0.16McgregorMika Joel Baur: 188 passningar, xT 0.51BaurViljami Sinisalo: 148 passningar, xT 0.04SinisaloBenjamin Nygren: 129 passningar, xT 0.16NygrenHaissem Hassan: 102 passningar, xT 1.66HassanHyun-Jun Yang: 96 passningar, xT 0.25YangDane Murray: 84 passningar, xT 0.08Murray

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceMotherwellCeltic
    Points818
    xPoints7.512.9
    xG per match1.42.6
    xGA per match1.60.95
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.130.69
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.350.08
    Playing styleMotherwellCeltic
    Build-up efficiency0.330.37
    Field tilt0.660.69
    xT per match1.11.6
    xTA per match0.840.57
    Won balls, offensive half2229
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.290.29
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.240.24
    Entries into the box per match1518
    Entries into the box against1410
    Pass completion %0.830.82
    Pass completion % under pressure0.790.78
    Passes per match528533
    Passes against per match304304
    Switches of play per match29.633.9
    Long balls per match2730
    Set piecesMotherwellCeltic
    xG from free kicks0.030
    Corners per match5.69.5
    Corners against per match5.64.2
    xG per corner0.020.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.560.51
    First touch, defensive corners %0.680.52
    OtherMotherwellCeltic
    Throw-in control0.810.79
    The goalkeepersAlexander Noah Paulsen (Motherwell)Viljami Sinisalo (Celtic)
    Saves1922
    Save %63%88%
    xG prevented36%57%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Motherwell vs Celtic according to our model?

    The model gives Celtic a 59% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Motherwell 22%, draw 19%, Celtic 59%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 64% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.