01 · 2 legs
Safe
- AFC Malmö to win58%
- Over 1.5 goals86%
Swedish Ettan11°4,1 mm35 km/h
Läs på svenska
AFC MalmöPossession & high pressFinal score 2–3. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for AFC Malmö vs Ängelholm (Swedish Ettan, Saturday, 24 October 2026): AFC Malmö win 58%, draw 21%, Ängelholm win 21%. Expected goals (xG): AFC Malmö 2.12, Ängelholm 1.30. Most likely score: 2-1 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 67%, both teams to score 64%. Double chance: AFC Malmö or draw 79%, Ängelholm or draw 42%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT (corrected):
Set against the backdrop of a possession-focused home side and a counter-attacking visitor, AFC Malmö and Ängelholm are primed for a clash where the hosts’ control should dictate the pace. Malmö’s high press often forces opponents into mistakes, and with a 58% win probability, they have clear leverage. The expected goals (xG) of 2.12 implies that Malmö will likely score more than once, while Ängelholm's xG of 1.30 suggests they might find the net too, even if less frequently.
Malmö enters with confidence, supported by a stronger league position with 44 points compared to Ängelholm's 24. Despite the points gap, the underlying numbers tell a more nuanced story. Ängelholm has a slight edge in expected points (xPoints), showing they might have been unlucky this season. Nonetheless, Malmö’s better xG per match underscores their attacking potency, which should be enough to overwhelm Ängelholm, especially given the visitors' equal xGA of 1.5 per match.
While the head-to-head record is too small to be decisive, the single prior meeting ended in a draw, indicating Ängelholm's ability to compete. Yet, with rain forecasted, expect more cautious play which typically suppresses goals. The odds, however, suggest otherwise — a 67% likelihood for over 2.5 goals, supported by attractive betting value.
For those scanning for angles, the over 3.5 goals at 2.28 with Betsafe and Nordicbet holds value, albeit with a modest 2% edge. Meanwhile, the safer over 2.5 at 1.52 with Betsafe still offers a 1% edge. The model leans towards a 2-1 outcome in Malmö’s favor, with the weather slightly tempering the goal expectation. However, the potential for a high-scoring affair remains, especially with the betting value clearly highlighting an opportunity in the goal markets.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · AFC Malmö | X | 2 · Ängelholm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.55 | 4.25 | 4.40 |
| LeoVegas | 1.57 | 4.10 | 4.30 |
| Nordicbet | 1.55 | 4.25 | 4.40 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 12:37
1.62 → 1.55
3.95 → 4.25
4.40 → 4.40
Nordicbet · 8 recorded price levels · 21/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | AFC Malmö | Ängelholm |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 44 | 24 |
| xPoints | 34.2 | 35.8 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.28 | 0.17 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Playing style | AFC Malmö | Ängelholm |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| Field tilt | 0.54 | 0.47 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 17 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 405 | 313 |
| Passes against per match | 352 | 396 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.7 | 17.9 |
| Long balls per match | 38 | 30 |
| Set pieces | AFC Malmö | Ängelholm |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Corners per match | 5.7 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.26 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.61 | 0.59 |
| Other | AFC Malmö | Ängelholm |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| The goalkeepers | Philip Mårtensson (AFC Malmö) | Robin Streifert (Ängelholm) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 41 | 85 |
| Save % | 70% | 66% |
| xG prevented | 34% | 39% |
| Claims | 69 (92%) | 196 (97%) |
The model gives AFC Malmö a 58% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: AFC Malmö 58%, draw 21%, Ängelholm 21%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 67% and under at 33%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 64% according to the model.
The model expects 2.12 goals (xG) for AFC Malmö and 1.30 for Ängelholm, 3.43 in total.
AFC Malmö or draw (1X) 79%, Ängelholm or draw (X2) 42% and no draw (12) 79%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.