01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Åtvidaberg or draw (X2)67%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish Ettan15°6,3 mm42 km/h
Läs på svenska
AFC MalmöPossession & high pressMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
TEXT (corrected):
AFC Malmö have found the back of the net in 11 straight league games, a streak that underscores their attacking prowess. Yet, Åtvidabergs FF holds a slight edge in expected goals per match (1.7 to 1.5), suggesting they are better at converting opportunities. Both teams adopt a possession and high press style, indicating an intense midfield battle. The single head-to-head match since 2023, won by Åtvidabergs, is too small a sample to overshadow current form and metrics.
With a 40% model probability favoring Åtvidabergs, the visitors are slightly more likely to edge this contest. Though the expected goals (1.47 for the hosts and 1.70 for the visitors) point to a narrow affair, the over 2.5 goals is favored at 61%. This aligns with both teams' scoring tendencies and the likelihood of open play despite the rain, which could dampen goal numbers slightly but is already factored into the model.
For bettors, the most intriguing angle is the over 2.5 goals market, given its 61% likelihood. The play here leans towards a 1-2 scoreline, with a preference for Åtvidabergs, supported by their leading edge in points and defensive metrics.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | AFC Malmö | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 30 | 35 |
| xPoints | 23.8 | 29.6 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.36 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | AFC Malmö | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.55 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 30 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.48 | 0.54 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 17 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 409 | 448 |
| Passes against per match | 347 | 340 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.4 | 13.7 |
| Long balls per match | 37 | 31 |
| Set pieces | AFC Malmö | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 5.5 | 6.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.56 | 0.27 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.65 |
| Other | AFC Malmö | Åtvidaberg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| The goalkeepers | Philip Mårtensson (AFC Malmö) | Hugo Claesson (Åtvidaberg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 41 | 44 |
| Save % | 70% | 61% |
| xG prevented | 34% | 40% |
| Claims | 69 (92%) | 78 (93%) |
The model gives Åtvidaberg a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: AFC Malmö 35%, draw 24%, Åtvidaberg 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.