Turkish 1. Lig22°14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Manisa FKManisa FKPossession control
    vs
    IstanbulsporIstanbulsporPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Manisa FK (54%)Best value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 4.54 (+10 %)

    Manisa FK vs Istanbulspor · Turkish 1. Lig

    1 · Manisa FK 54%X 24%22% Istanbulspor · 2

    Analysis: Manisa FKIstanbulspor

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    Manisa FK and Istanbulspor have faced each other four times since 2024, with the visitors holding a slight edge with two victories. However, this small sample size shouldn't overshadow the current form and expected goals, which paint a different picture. The hosts have a clear advantage in both points and xPoints, hinting that they are better positioned for success in the upcoming clash. Recent form further complicates Istanbulspor's prospects; they have lost three consecutive matches.

    The model gives Manisa a 54% chance of winning, and this is supported by their superior expected goals tally of 1.72 compared to Istanbulspor's 1.00. It aligns with the most likely scorelines, suggesting a 1-1 draw, a 1-0 win for Manisa, or a 2-1 victory for the hosts. Although both teams favor possession control, Manisa has been more effective in converting that style into tangible results this season.

    With an over 2.5 goals probability of 51% and both teams to score sitting at 52%, the market sees this as a potentially close contest. Yet, the underlying xG figures imply Manisa's defense can better manage Istanbulspor’s offensive threats. Despite the high profile of both teams aiming to control the game, the hosts' tighter defensive setup gives them a critical edge.

    For those hunting value, the under 1.5 goals market presents a rare opportunity. Offered at odds of 4.54 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the model identifies a noteworthy 10% edge, rating it a 24% probability. While it's a long shot, the calculated risk may yield dividends for those looking to capitalize on the market's oversight.

    Manisa FKManisa FK
    Form DDLLD
    League ranking xG #6xGA #13xT #10xP/match #8Points #7
    Key players
    • Cheikne SyllaFxG 0.39 · xT 0.13
    • Atakan CankayaCBxG 0.12 · xT 0.07
    • Julien AnzianiCAMxG 0.55 · xT 0.02
    IstanbulsporIstanbulspor
    Form LDLLL
    League ranking xG #16xGA #18xT #17xP/match #16Points #20
    Key players
    • Alieu ChamFxG 0.22 · xT 0.23
    • Phellipe Cardoso AraújoFxG 0.46 · xT 0.21
    • Michael OlogoCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.02

    Match prediction: Manisa FKIstanbulspor

    Predicted score matrix

    Istanbulspor
    Manisa FK
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.9%
    0–16.3%
    0–23.3%
    0–31.1%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–011.0%
    1–111.7%
    1–25.7%
    1–31.9%
    1–4+0.6%
    2
    2–09.7%
    2–19.7%
    2–24.9%
    2–31.6%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–05.6%
    3–15.6%
    3–22.8%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–03.5%
    4+–13.5%
    4+–21.8%
    4+–30.6%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.2-110%
    4. 4.2-010%
    5. 5.0-07%
    Expected goals
    1,721,00
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,549%
    @2.24EV+10%
    Over 2,551%
    @1.56

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Manisa FK to win54%
    • Over 1.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    43%

    Fair odds

    2.34

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Manisa FK to win54%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Cheikne Sylla to score35%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Cheikne Sylla to score35%
    • Abdullah Dıjlan Aydın to be booked26%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.524% probability@4.54BetsafeEV+10%reference odds
    • Under 1.524% probability@4.54BetssonEV+10%reference odds
    • Under 1.524% probability@4.54NordicbetEV+10%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Manisa FKX2 · Istanbulspor
    Betsafe
    EV+ 3%
    1.90
    3.613.47
    Betsson
    EV+ 3%
    1.90
    3.613.47
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 3%
    1.90
    3.613.47

    Odds updated 16 Sept, 11:37

    Odds movement

    10 %
    51 %46 %

    1.901.90

    X0 %
    28 %23 %

    3.613.61

    20 %
    29 %24 %

    3.473.47

    Over 2,5+1 %
    62 %57 %

    1.551.56

    Betsson · 3 recorded price levels · 14/09/2026 → 16/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Manisa FK 1Draw 1Istanbulspor 2
    Goals: 45 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on Turkish 1. Lig data since 2024.

    Key facts

    • Istanbulspor have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Manisa FK
    Istanbulspor
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Manisa FK (1612)
    Istanbulspor (822)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Manisa FK
    Birama Touré: 216 passningar, xT 0.2TouréChristophe Hérelle: 192 passningar, xT 0.83HérelleAtakan Cankaya: 180 passningar, xT 0.16CankayaJulien Anziani: 167 passningar, xT 0AnzianiYassine Otmane Benrahou: 166 passningar, xT 0.31BenrahouKadir Kaan Yurdakul: 158 passningar, xT 0.63YurdakulYasin Gureler: 139 passningar, xT 0.53GurelerVedat Karakuş: 109 passningar, xT 0.19KarakuşAda Ibik: 96 passningar, xT 0.23IbikYusuf Talum: 79 passningar, xT 0.22TalumWaldir Alenis Vargas Valentin: 53 passningar, xT 0.05Valentin
    Istanbulspor
    Alp Tutar: 174 passningar, xT 0.31TutarYusuf Ozer: 169 passningar, xT 0.34OzerMuhlis Dağaşan: 114 passningar, xT 0.07DağaşanElvin Mendy: 107 passningar, xT 0MendyDijlan Aydin: 106 passningar, xT 0.05AydinMichael Ologo: 102 passningar, xT 0.07OlogoPhellipe Cardoso Araújo: 100 passningar, xT 0.48AraújoDuran Şahin: 93 passningar, xT 0.08ŞahinEmrecan Uzunhan: 92 passningar, xT 0.08UzunhanIlian Ilianov Iliev: 74 passningar, xT 0IlievAlieu Cham: 69 passningar, xT 0.67Cham
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Manisa FK
    Birama Touré: 216 passningar, xT 0.2TouréChristophe Hérelle: 192 passningar, xT 0.83HérelleAtakan Cankaya: 180 passningar, xT 0.16CankayaJulien Anziani: 167 passningar, xT 0AnzianiYassine Otmane Benrahou: 166 passningar, xT 0.31BenrahouKadir Kaan Yurdakul: 158 passningar, xT 0.63YurdakulYasin Gureler: 139 passningar, xT 0.53GurelerVedat Karakuş: 109 passningar, xT 0.19KarakuşAda Ibik: 96 passningar, xT 0.23IbikYusuf Talum: 79 passningar, xT 0.22TalumWaldir Alenis Vargas Valentin: 53 passningar, xT 0.05Valentin
    Istanbulspor
    Alp Tutar: 174 passningar, xT 0.31TutarYusuf Ozer: 169 passningar, xT 0.34OzerMuhlis Dağaşan: 114 passningar, xT 0.07DağaşanElvin Mendy: 107 passningar, xT 0MendyDijlan Aydin: 106 passningar, xT 0.05AydinMichael Ologo: 102 passningar, xT 0.07OlogoPhellipe Cardoso Araújo: 100 passningar, xT 0.48AraújoDuran Şahin: 93 passningar, xT 0.08ŞahinEmrecan Uzunhan: 92 passningar, xT 0.08UzunhanIlian Ilianov Iliev: 74 passningar, xT 0IlievAlieu Cham: 69 passningar, xT 0.67Cham

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceManisa FKIstanbulspor
    Points122
    xPoints11.69.4
    xG per match1.51.1
    xGA per match1.31.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.350.06
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.47
    Playing styleManisa FKIstanbulspor
    Build-up efficiency0.310.33
    Field tilt0.460.4
    xT per match0.990.77
    xTA per match0.761.1
    Won balls, offensive half2419
    Pressing intensity0.230.22
    Pressing efficiency0.320.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.280.16
    Entries into the box per match118
    Entries into the box against1114
    Pass completion %0.790.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.72
    Passes per match375309
    Passes against per match325400
    Switches of play per match24.926.1
    Long balls per match3836
    Set piecesManisa FKIstanbulspor
    xG from free kicks0.10.06
    Corners per match3.52.7
    Corners against per match4.94.8
    xG per corner0.010.03
    xGA per corner against0.040.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.540.59
    First touch, defensive corners %0.560.54
    OtherManisa FKIstanbulspor
    Throw-in control0.680.78
    The goalkeepersVedat Karakuş (Manisa FK)Alp Tutar (Istanbulspor)
    Saves1724
    Save %59%53%
    xG prevented27%31%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Manisa FK vs Istanbulspor according to our model?

    The model gives Manisa FK a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Manisa FK 54%, draw 24%, Istanbulspor 22%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.