01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Van Spor FK to win77%
- Over 1.5 goals89%
Turkish 1. Lig26°21 km/h
Läs på svenska
Manisa FKPossession & high press
Van Spor FKLow block & directAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
77% is a staggering win probability for Van Spor FK, making clear the gap between the teams despite Manisa FK's edge in the early standings and expected goals data. The model underscores Van Spor FK's prowess, projecting them to exploit Manisa FK's defensive gaps with ruthless efficiency. Expected goals of 0.97 for Manisa FK against Van Spor FK's 2.80 highlights where the likely dominance will lie: Van Spor's ability to find the net with ease.
Manisa FK, with a possession-heavy, high-press approach, might find it challenging to break through Van Spor's low defensive block and direct play. This clash of styles suggests Manisa FK's possession could be futile if Van Spor executes their game plan effectively. Despite Manisa having racked up more points and xPoints, their defensive vulnerabilities are stark—xGA of 2.4 per match for Van Spor FK to exploit.
0-2 and 1-2 emerge as the most probable scorelines, each with a 9% likelihood, emphasizing Van Spor's potential to score multiple goals. A 73% chance of over 2.5 goals aligns with this, suggesting a high-scoring affair that could see Van Spor FK's precision in attack at play. The weather is not a factor here, so these offensive expectations are baked in without outside interference.
Van Spor FK's stark 77% chance of victory offers value with Bet365 at odds of 1.35. In a betting landscape where certainty is rare, this match presents a compelling case for an away win. The analysis points to Van Spor FK not just winning but doing so convincingly. With an eye on the over 2.5 goals market, this match not only leans towards Van Spor FK's offensive success but also promises a high-scoring spectacle.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Manisa FK | Van Spor FK |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 0 |
| xPoints | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 0.42 |
| xGA per match | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.36 | 0.06 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.84 |
| Playing style | Manisa FK | Van Spor FK |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.68 | 0.08 |
| xT per match | 0.93 | 0.37 |
| xTA per match | 0.68 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 12 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.43 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.36 | 0.11 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 3 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 517 | 189 |
| Passes against per match | 225 | 697 |
| Switches of play per match | 32.5 | 14.5 |
| Long balls per match | 34 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Manisa FK | Van Spor FK |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 2.9 | 5.2 |
| Corners against per match | 2.9 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0 | 0.2 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 1 | 0 |
| Other | Manisa FK | Van Spor FK |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.57 |
| The goalkeepers | Birama Touré (Manisa FK) | Naby Oulare (Van Spor FK) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3 | 3 |
| Save % | 100% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Van Spor FK a 77% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Manisa FK 9%, draw 14%, Van Spor FK 77%.
The model's most likely final score is 0-2 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 73% and under at 27%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.