01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Besiktas JK to win49%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
Süper Lig25°11 km/h
Läs på svenska
AmedsporPossession controlOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Beşiktaş's recent form is the headline here, as they cruise into this fixture on the back of three successive victories. This streak has them sitting on 12 points, slightly ahead of Amed's 10, but it's the underlying numbers that reveal the tightness in this matchup. Both sides have strikingly similar expected points—9.6 for Beşiktaş and 9.3 for the hosts—which suggests the points tally difference might flatter the visitors.
Amed's playing style is built around possession control, a strategy that could be severely tested against the high press and possession-based approach of their opponents. The expected goals model gives Beşiktaş a slight edge at 1.40 compared to Amed’s 1.05, indicating that while both teams are likely to create chances, the visitors are expected to be more potent.
Despite Beşiktaş's form and the model's lean towards them, the most likely scorelines tell a story of caution. A 1-1 draw is the most probable outcome at 13%, with a 0-1 result closely following at 12%. The match is not expected to burst with goals, with a 44% chance of going over 2.5 goals. Both teams to score sits at an evenly poised 49%, indicating a balanced affair in front of goal.
For bettors, there's a particularly intriguing value play on the cards. The under 0.5 goals market is offering odds of 15.0 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, which the model estimates at a 9% probability. This represents a 34% edge, a tempting punt for those looking to capitalize on the less likely event of a goalless draw.
All considered, while Beşiktaş's recent form and playing style edge them as favorites, Amed's ability to control possession at home shouldn't be underestimated. A tight contest with a 1-1 scoreline seems fitting, but the sharpest angle could well be that enticing under 0.5 goals bet.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Amedspor | X | 2 · Besiktas JK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 2% 4.00 | 3.55 | 1.85 |
| Betsson | EV+ 2% 4.00 | 3.55 | 1.85 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 2% 4.00 | 3.55 | 1.85 |
| Paddy Power | EV+ 13% 4.40 | 3.80 | 1.61 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 8% 4.21 | EV+ 1% 3.89 | 1.83 |
Odds updated 20 Sept, 11:36
4.23 → 4.21
3.87 → 3.89
1.77 → 1.83
Pinnacle · 17 recorded price levels · 14/09/2026 → 20/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Amedspor | Besiktas JK |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 12 |
| xPoints | 9.3 | 9.6 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 0.82 | 0.44 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.17 | 0.07 |
| Playing style | Amedspor | Besiktas JK |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.78 |
| xT per match | 0.86 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 0.57 | 0.43 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 20 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 20 |
| Entries into the box against | 6 | 6 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 354 | 464 |
| Passes against per match | 371 | 268 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.9 | 39.4 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 44 |
| Set pieces | Amedspor | Besiktas JK |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 8.2 |
| Corners against per match | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| Other | Amedspor | Besiktas JK |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Alban-Marc Lafont (Amedspor) | Alexander Nübel (Besiktas JK) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 6 |
| Save % | 71% | 60% |
| xG prevented | 60% | 43% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Besiktas JK a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Amedspor 26%, draw 26%, Besiktas JK 49%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.