01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Amedspor or draw (1X)65%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Süper Lig27°10 km/h
Läs på svenska
AmedsporBalanced & physicalMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The TEXT states: "pointing to a probable 2-1 victory for the hosts." This contradicts the FACTS, where the most likely scoreline is 1-1 (12%), not 2-1 (9%). Corrected version:
Amedspor's calculated 42% chance of victory stands out in this clash against Trabzonspor, where the visitors are given a 33% shot and a draw lingers at 25%. The odds favoring the hosts at 3.55 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet highlight a substantial value opportunity — a tempting 48% edge according to the model. It's a nuanced battle between Amed's balanced, physical play and Trabzon's focus on possession, both with distinct strengths and weaknesses.
The expected goals tell a different story: Amed's 0.99 xG per match is overshadowed by Trabzonspor's 1.6, suggesting the visitors have a sharper attacking edge. Yet, defensively, Amed's xGA of 0.86 against Trabzonspor's 1.6 indicates a more robust backline for the hosts. This defensive solidity could prove decisive, particularly in a tightly contested encounter.
The most likely scorelines — 1-1 (12%), 2-1 (9%), and 1-0 (8%) — imply a narrow game, with a slight lean towards Amed. With over 2.5 goals projected at 53% and both teams scoring at 57%, there is an expectation of action, albeit tempered by Amed's defensive discipline. These numbers suggest a cautious approach might suppress a high-scoring affair.
Despite Trabzonspor's slight edge in points, Amed's superior xPoints (2.8 vs. 2.0) and defensive metrics present a compelling case for the hosts. This matchup is less about past performances and more about current form and tactical execution. The small head-to-head sample size means these factors weigh more heavily.
In essence, the sharpest angle lies in backing Amed at those favorable odds. The model's lean and betting value align, pointing to a probable 1-1 draw as the single most likely result, though Amed remains the favored side. Those looking for value should consider home advantage in what promises to be a tightly fought battle.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Amedspor | X | 2 · Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | EV+ 75% 4.20 | EV+ 2% 4.00 | 1.67 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 42% 3.40 | 3.50 | 2.02 |
| Betsson | EV+ 42% 3.40 | 3.50 | 2.02 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 42% 3.40 | 3.50 | 2.02 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 51% 3.61 | 3.65 | 2.05 |
Odds updated 31 Aug, 11:35
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Amedspor win since 25 August — the odds have shortened from 3.98 to 3.61 (−9%).
3.98 → 3.61
3.93 → 3.65
1.81 → 2.05
1.68 → 1.75
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 25/08/2026 → 31/08/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Amedspor | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 4 |
| xPoints | 2.8 | 2 |
| xG per match | 0.99 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 0.86 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.06 | 0.27 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.25 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Amedspor | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.6 |
| xT per match | 0.86 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 0.79 | 0.93 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.2 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 6 | 6 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 401 | 433 |
| Passes against per match | 373 | 319 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.8 | 36.5 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 43 |
| Set pieces | Amedspor | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 7.5 |
| Corners against per match | 3.5 | 2 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.12 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.86 | 0.25 |
| Other | Amedspor | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| The goalkeepers | Alban-Marc Lafont (Amedspor) | André Onana Onana (Trabzonspor) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2 | 6 |
| Save % | 50% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 19% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Amedspor a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Amedspor 42%, draw 25%, Trabzonspor 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.