01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Club Brugge to win65%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Belgian Pro LeagueJan Breydel Stadion, Brugge18°23 km/h
Läs på svenska
GenkPossession & high pressMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Club Brugge's 65% probability of winning against Genk underscores their dominance in this fixture, having triumphed in 8 of the last 10 meetings. The hosts have been relentless in front of goal, scoring in 23 consecutive league matches, which supports the expected goals tally of 2.08. Genk, despite being unbeaten in their last five league games, face an uphill battle, reflected in their mere 15% chance of victory and a lower expected goals figure of 1.00.
Both teams employ a possession-based style with a high press, which often leads to open play and goal-scoring opportunities. Historically, this match averages 3.3 goals, aligning with the model's 60% lean towards over 2.5 goals. However, betting angles indicate value in the under 2.5 market, priced at 2.85, suggesting a closer, possibly tighter contest than history might suggest.
Given the statistical landscape and Club Brugge's recent form, a 2-1 or 2-0 win for the hosts seems plausible. Yet, with the model identifying a 40% chance for fewer than three goals, there’s a significant 15% value edge in backing under 2.5 goals at Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, which might appeal to those seeking a calculated risk.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Club Brugge | X | 2 · Genk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.52 | 4.25 | 5.75 |
| Betsson | 1.52 | 4.25 | 5.75 |
| Nordicbet | 1.52 | 4.25 | 5.75 |
| Pinnacle | 1.51 | 4.77 | 5.28 |
Odds updated 19 Sept, 05:04
1.49 → 1.51
4.77 → 4.77
5.63 → 5.28
Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 14/09/2026 → 19/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Club Brugge | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 15 | 9 |
| xPoints | 10.2 | 9.4 |
| xG per match | 2.5 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 0.96 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.36 | 0.35 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | Club Brugge | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.72 | 0.56 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.76 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 21 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 8 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 556 | 444 |
| Passes against per match | 267 | 359 |
| Switches of play per match | 30.5 | 41 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 41 |
| Set pieces | Club Brugge | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 9 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 2.7 | 6.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.57 |
| Other | Club Brugge | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| The goalkeepers | Yann Sommer (Club Brugge) | Lucca Brughmans (Genk) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 21 | 16 |
| Save % | 88% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 62% | 41% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Club Brugge a 65% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Club Brugge 65%, draw 19%, Genk 15%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.