01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Dinamo Zagreb to win75%
- Over 1.5 goals86%
Croatian HNL12°12 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–5. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Slaven Belupo vs Dinamo Zagreb (Croatian HNL, Sunday, 18 October 2026): Slaven Belupo win 10%, draw 16%, Dinamo Zagreb win 75%. Expected goals (xG): Slaven Belupo 0.83, Dinamo Zagreb 2.65. Most likely score: 0-2 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 68%, both teams to score 53%. Double chance: Slaven Belupo or draw 25%, Dinamo Zagreb or draw 90%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The clash between Slaven Belupo and Dinamo Zagreb seems destined to follow a familiar script, with the visitors poised to dominate proceedings. With a staggering 75% win probability favoring Dinamo Zagreb, it's clear they are the dominant force in this matchup. The model highlights a 0-2 scoreline as the most probable outcome, reflecting the visitors' potent attacking prowess against the hosts' vulnerable defense. Slaven Belupo's low defensive setup is likely to be severely tested by Zagreb's possession-oriented style and high press.
Dinamo's recent form bolsters their credentials. They've consistently found the net in their last eight league matches, underscoring their attacking threat. Even when factoring in the average 4.2 goals per match in this fixture, the likelihood of seeing over 2.5 goals is significant at 68%. Slaven Belupo, on the other hand, faces a tough challenge, struggling to contain opponents with an xGA of 1.8 per match. Their direct style might yield chances, but their expected goals figure of 0.83 suggests these will be limited against a well-drilled Zagreb defense.
Though the head-to-head record since 2023 shows a small sample size, Zagreb's dominance is evident, winning 7 of the 9 encounters. This historical pattern enhances confidence in an away victory. With Zagreb's xG per match at 2.3, compared to Slaven's 1.0, the disparity in attacking capability is clear. Such numbers suggest that while a Slaven Belupo goal isn't out of the question, a narrow one-goal margin seems their best hope.
For bettors, the away win is priced at 1.34 with Betsafe and Nordicbet, matching the model's 75% win probability — a fair price with no edge (0% EV), reflecting Dinamo Zagreb's clear superiority rather than a betting value opportunity.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Slaven Belupo | X | 2 · Dinamo Zagreb |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 6.20 | 4.80 | EV+ 2% 1.37 |
| LeoVegas | 6.10 | 4.85 | EV+ 2% 1.36 |
| Nordicbet | 6.20 | 4.80 | EV+ 2% 1.37 |
| Pinnacle | 6.85 | 5.27 | EV+ 3% 1.38 |
Odds updated 18 Oct, 13:35
6.37 → 6.85
5.20 → 5.27
1.37 → 1.38
Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 12/10/2026 → 18/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Croatian HNL data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Slaven Belupo | Dinamo Zagreb |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 16 |
| xPoints | 10 | 15.8 |
| xG per match | 1 | 2.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 0.81 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.09 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | Slaven Belupo | Dinamo Zagreb |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.37 | 0.77 |
| xT per match | 0.89 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.65 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 32 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 18 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 6 |
| Pass completion % | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 272 | 431 |
| Passes against per match | 394 | 246 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.7 | 32.9 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Slaven Belupo | Dinamo Zagreb |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 3.9 | 7.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 2.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.43 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.54 | 0.7 |
| Other | Slaven Belupo | Dinamo Zagreb |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Karlo Sentić (Slaven Belupo) | Dominik Kotarski (Dinamo Zagreb) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 20 | 12 |
| Save % | 59% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 41% | 41% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Dinamo Zagreb a 75% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Slaven Belupo 10%, draw 16%, Dinamo Zagreb 75%.
The model's most likely final score is 0-2 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 68% and under at 32%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The model expects 0.83 goals (xG) for Slaven Belupo and 2.65 for Dinamo Zagreb, 3.48 in total.
Slaven Belupo or draw (1X) 25%, Dinamo Zagreb or draw (X2) 90% and no draw (12) 84%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.