01 · 2 legs
Safe
- NEC to win52%
- Over 1.5 goals81%
EredivisieCambuur Stadion, Leeuwarden16°5,6 mm24 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
One factual error found: the text says "reinforced by their more potent xG of 1.9 per match" but this is xG per match data, which is fine, but let's check the scorelines - "likely scoreline of 1-1 or 1-2" omits 0-1, which is a minor omission not an error.
Checking more carefully: the text states "This tactical contrast sets the stage for a match where NEC's pressing game could thrive against Cambuur's attempts to dictate tempo" - this is fine.
The key issue: text says "with NEC narrowly edging the match" - but NEC has 52% vs Cambuur 26%, which isn't "narrow" - this is opinion/style, not a factual error.
Checking the EV+ value section: "The model rates Cambuur's chances at 26%, translating to a notable 37% edge" - this matches FACTS exactly (26%, 37% edge) for home odds 5.31. This is consistent.
All numbers check out: 52% NEC win, 1.9 vs 1.1 xG, 28 consecutive matches, 2.3 xGA, 1.76 xG, 1.30 xG, 60% BTTS, 59% over 2.5, 5.31 odds, 26%, 37% edge.
OK
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cambuur | X | 2 · NEC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | EV+ 36% 5.25 | EV+ 12% 5.00 | 1.44 |
| Betfair Exchange | EV+ 53% 5.90 | EV+ 15% 5.10 | 1.46 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 25% 4.83 | 4.11 | 1.62 |
| Betsson | EV+ 25% 4.83 | 4.11 | 1.62 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 25% 4.83 | 4.11 | 1.62 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 29% 4.99 | EV+ 4% 4.61 | 1.60 |
Odds updated 12 Sept, 20:25
5.34 → 4.99
4.86 → 4.61
1.50 → 1.60
Pinnacle · 18 recorded price levels · 09/09/2026 → 12/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 7 |
| xPoints | 4 | 6.8 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.29 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.42 | 0.8 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.39 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 22 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 348 | 447 |
| Passes against per match | 350 | 213 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.4 | 17.4 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.8 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 6 | 3 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.48 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.73 |
| Other | Cambuur | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Thijs Jansen (Cambuur) | Gonzalo Alejandro Crettaz (NEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 5 |
| Save % | 51% | 42% |
| xG prevented | 28% | 13% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives NEC a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambuur 26%, draw 22%, NEC 52%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.